USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium MALAC MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L half having calyx (50%) 5.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL MONO Blueberry consortium MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 SNL USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FLTH FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 USDA-ARS very soft 1.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 GALL STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL STCA Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% NFR USDA-ARS-HCRL SWDRI SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FRSP_FruitSplit_% FRSP USDA-ARS-TCHSL GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale BLSHVE BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 Blueberry consortium BLS USDA-ARS 4.0 70% killed to the ground LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale USDA-ARS-HCRL LBR Ebrahiem Babiker GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FC_Color_0-9scale FC USDA-ARS-TCHSL MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g MAC Blueberry consortium 9.0 very easy to remove above average vigorous (40% will die) 6.0 6.0 30% heterogeneous sizes semi soft 4.0 mostly loose 8.0 1.0 very tight all decayed 1.0 VIG3 USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale FREASE Blueberry consortium PLWTH PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm USDA-ARS-HCRL DNARATIO GRIN-Vaccinium DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA Blueberry consortium FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRD USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL2 Blueberry consortium Lowest 1.0 FRDIA USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm Jeannie Rowland 8.0 5% damage light red fruit 6.0 3.0 75% decayed 8.0 5% rubs off TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g USDA-ARS TAC Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium BS2 BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS-HCRL TTT TTT_CultivarID_0/1 Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FRUV 9.0 excellent USDA-ARS-TCHSL DAC DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium aluminum blue fruits 9.0 MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% Blueberry consortium MBFR Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium LFD 5.0 average yield rubs off easily 1.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CYAC CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium SSP_SolubleSolids_% SSP GRIN-Vaccinium PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium PHTB ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 ALFR USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL BLODUR Blueberry consortium BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale 1.0 mush 4.0 60% rubs off FRPH FRPH_FruitJuice_pH USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium MGLC MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRDMG_FrostDamage_% FRDMG USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium Ohio State University MINSOIL Blueberry consortium MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index Blueberry consortium POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale GRIN-Vaccinium POLGR BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium BERRUPRGT average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 5.0 slightly tart but sweetness overpowering 7.0 BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BBC 7.0 mostly firm 1 bud/cane 1.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium QAC QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium KGC KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research BUDSZ BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FLAVONC FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g very vigorous (highest survival) 9.0 FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRAP USDA-ARS-HCRL FWT2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g Blueberry consortium YIELDACRE_Yield_kg GRIN-Vaccinium YIELDACRE Blueberry consortium light blue fruits 8.0 light black fruit 2.0 2.0 very tart but sweetness USDA-ARS-TCHSL SWD Blueberry consortium SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index BLST BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium 20% buds destroyed 9.0 moderately high yield 7.0 4.0 70% buds destroyed 5.0 45% rubs off very firm 9.0 60% difficult to remove 4.0 Blueberry consortium PGLC PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium FAC FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g mush 1.0 4.0 semi mush mostly mush 2.0 Blueberry consortium PB2C PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI VIG Blueberry consortium VIG_Vigor_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL 15% difficult to remove 7.0 GLUCC_Glucose_g/L USDA-ARS GLUCC Blueberry consortium semi-loose canopy 3.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL BSZ Blueberry consortium BSZ_BushSize_cm2 USDA-ARS ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 Blueberry consortium ANFR PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g PEGAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50B_50%Bloom_day Blueberry consortium 50B USDA-ARS-HCRL above average yield 6.0 TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL TA2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PAC Blueberry consortium PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-HCRL SELF SELF_SelfFertility_% Blueberry consortium willowy 1.0 90% difficult to remove 2.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL BS BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium CLUSTER2 USDA-ARS-HCRL CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale 5.0 semi firm crunch 8.0 80% having calyx 2.0 9.0 no decay Blueberry consortium FRSC USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g FLAVANC GRIN-Vaccinium REPEATBLM Blueberry consortium REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% acronym GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIC Blueberry consortium SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale USDA-ARS-HCRL WHBUD Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIS 90% rubs off 2.0 FRCR Blueberry consortium FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L DGLUCC USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g PEGLC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L CITAC 75% heterogeneous sizes 3.0 1.0 no yield 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 2.0 Ebrahiem Babiker PENTMEAN USDA-ARS-TCHSL PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms DGLC DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 BMS USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium FT Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g CHAC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium QGC QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium APH APH_SusToAphids_0/1 Blueberry consortium NEM NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 USDA-ARS 1.0 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) LC LC_Color_0-1scale Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium moderatly firm 6.0 SCALE SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium CYGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEAC mostly tight 2.0 5.0 45% heterogeneous sizes entity STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 USDA-ARS STB Blueberry consortium TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TOTAC EGF Blueberry consortium EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g PGAC 7.0 moderately dense canopy 50RB_50%ReBloom_day USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 50RB 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRFRMMEAN FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm Ebrahiem Babiker BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 BLSV USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium weak, most will die 1.0 FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSZ Blueberry consortium 2.0 90% heterogeneous sizes USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TA3 TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm GRIN-Vaccinium PLGRC semi firm 5.0 LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index LHR North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI CC CC_Catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium dark red fruit 5.0 Jeannie Rowland FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale FRFRM USDA-ARS-GIFVL 9.0 aluminum blue fruits COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius COLDTL USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year BLSHV GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium all buds destroyed on bush 1.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS3 SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix 9.0 no damage average vigorous, 50% will die 5.0 USDA-ARS STGW Blueberry consortium STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 SWDAMP SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm USDA-ARS-HCRL PLHGT PHENAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g GRH USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale 4.0 above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) moderately vigoroug (30% will die) 7.0 low yield 3.0 YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium YLDW STBL USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm Blueberry consortium LGF_LateGreenFruit_date LGF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium FSP FSP_FruitSet_% GRIN-Vaccinium 8.0 light blue fruits 4.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 2.0 2-3 buds/cane TAC2 TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGAC DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG2 VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale Blueberry consortium black fruit 1.0 MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% MBBL Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRF2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research SS 30% buds destroyed 8.0 Blueberry consortium SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count SWDRR GRIN-Vaccinium FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRFRMB Blueberry consortium BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 BDMT USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium semi firm 5.0 long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 2.0 9.0 stocky 5% decayed 8.0 Blueberry consortium POLR POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% USDA-ARS-HCRL GRIN-Vaccinium SWDVEPF Blueberry consortium SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count 1.0 difficult to remove 50RP_50%Ripe_day 50RP USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL TA FRDIA2 FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-TCHSL 4.0 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 1.0 awful CAC CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TADA TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 3.0 balanced tartness and sweetness 5.0 Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium PFRROT_FruitRot_% PFRROT average density canopy 5.0 4.0 semi-loose ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit 1.0 AGC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g 4.0 60% having calyx Blueberry consortium WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 WINM USDA-ARS light red fruit 6.0 QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g QRC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium ELFS ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 PC moderately soft 3.0 Blueberry consortium YLD YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL 2.0 medium-loose too firm 9.0 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BLMAG BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 SS2_TotSugar_brix Blueberry consortium SS2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL moderately mush 3.0 FRCL USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g FRUCC FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count FRSZ2 GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CLUSTER CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale 5% willowy 8.0 50% buds destroyed 6.0 no damage 10.0 Blueberry consortium 5RP_5%Ripe_day 5RP USDA-ARS-GIFVL BLSHVP USDA-ARS-HCRL BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 Blueberry consortium Blueberry ontology North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g MGC 95RP Blueberry consortium 95RP_95%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-HCRL very dense canopy 9.0 3.0 dark purple fruit Blueberry consortium MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGAC 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 5.0 Blueberry consortium FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count FLWRSUPRGT GRIN-Vaccinium 8.0 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits moderately mush 3.0 FUB_FullBloom_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium FUB 8.0 short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium PB1C 15% willowy 7.0 9.0 20% killed to the ground PF PF_PetalFall_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FIB USDA-ARS-GIFVL FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date Blueberry consortium moderatly firm 6.0 NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium NRBV loose (type 5) 5.0 3.0 moderate resistance (45% resistant) 2.0 light black fruit 7.0 15% heterogeneous sizes SUCC_Sucrose_g/L Blueberry consortium SUCC USDA-ARS-TCHSL high resistance (75% resistant) 4.0 9.0 no calyx CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGLC Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 CFW USDA-ARS slight too tart but acceptable 4.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale Blueberry consortium BLOOM 50% uniformly sized buds 3.0 GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium GFRD mostly firm 7.0 3.0 moderately tight 6.0 above average dense canopy 4.0 60% heterogeneous sizes LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium LRR 7.0 30% having calyx USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium CALYX CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale 9.0 stays on 30% killed to the ground 8.0 Jeannie Rowland SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date SHEXP USDA-ARS-GIFVL 30% willowy 6.0 8.0 5% difficult to remove USDA-ARS-GIFVL SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix SS5 Blueberry consortium lots of damage 1.0 8.0 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 20% uniformly sized buds 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness worst, heterogenous sizes 1.0 1.0 large, deep, torn skin, wet Blueberry consortium FRFB USDA-ARS-HCRL FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 40% killed to the ground 7.0 3.0 4+ buds/cane 6.0 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 15% decayed 7.0 60% damage 4.0 Medium 2.0 USDA-ARS WGR Blueberry consortium WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 Blueberry consortium FWT FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g USDA-ARS-GIFVL 90% damage 2.0 FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRFRM2 CR USDA-ARS-GIFVL CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour Blueberry consortium PRR PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium FRP USDA-ARS-HCRL FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date Blueberry consortium 15% rubs off 7.0 1.0 less dense canopy 3.0 loose 5.0 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits weak 1.0 SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count SDN Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL mostly mush 2.0 5.0 45% damage 60% decayed 4.0 60% buds destroyed 5.0 ASTB USDA-ARS ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 Blueberry consortium 3.0 weak, 70% will die 75% difficult to remove 3.0 3.0 80% buds destroyed SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDLPF 45% willowy 5.0 2.0 90% willowy vigorous 3.0 90% killed to the ground 2.0 3.0 dark purple fruit too firm 9.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL HVSP HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium CRFW 6.0 30% decayed 8.0 sweetness overpowering killed to the ground 1.0 ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g ECC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 7.0 45% decayed 5.0 3.0 75% rubs off 7.0 mostly firm 2.0 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet extremely loose 9.0 TPC TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRF FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale 3.0 75% damage 20% having calyx 8.0 mostly soft 2.0 60% killed to the ground 5.0 3.0 70% having calyx 6.0 slightly tart but good sweetness USDA-ARS-GIFVL BRF_75%Ripe_date BRF Blueberry consortium light purple fruit 4.0 short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 9.0 still too tart 3.0 50% killed to the ground 6.0 no damage 10.0 moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 3.0 8.0 vigorous (20% will die) moderately loose 7.0 6.0 moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) 5% heterogeneous sizes 8.0 60% will die 4.0 maximum resistance (>80% resistant) 5.0 9.0 best, homogeneous 1.0 dense WHWOOD Michigan State University WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale Blueberry consortium dark blue fruits 7.0 loose (type 6) 6.0 40% having calyx 6.0 60% willowy 4.0 moderately low yiedld 4.0 short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) 7.0 Blueberry consortium FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% FRROT Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research 2.0 90% buds destroyed overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking 9.0 very low yield 2.0 80% uniformly sized buds 2.0 dense canopy 8.0 4.0 semi mush FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% FLBL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet 6.0 3.0 75% willowy 4.0 loose canopy 80% killed to the ground 3.0 8.0 high yield, optimal 5.0 45% difficult to remove 6.0 30% rubs off 2.0 light resistance (30% resistant) 1.0 minimal resistance (15% resistant) 1.0 all calyx black fruit 1.0 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet 7.0 4.0 light purple fruit Highest 3.0 30% difficult to remove 6.0 2.0 weak, 80% will die 1.0 uniformly sized buds attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact 9.0 90% decayed 2.0 between or average 2.0 nice pop, optimal firmness 8.0 7.0 40% buds destroyed 5.0 dark red fruit dark blue fruits 7.0 6.0 30% damage 2.0 moderately loose canopy 7.0 15% damage moderatly firm 6.0 9.0 small, dry substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 5.0 attribute Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Leaf density Leaf Density of leaves in plant canopy density mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Average weight of 25 fruits 0-10 index Visual rating of picking scar on fruit Rating of picking scar 1-5 bud size scale Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January Leaf to bloom ratio quercetin galactoside content Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content Fruit quercetin galactoside content Fruit Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Measurement of plant growth upright Visual rating of cluster tightness Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept Leaf Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation Leaf rust resistance rust resistance Bud winter moth Bud Susceptibility to winter moth winter moth 0/1 Flower petal fall Timing of petal fall Flower petal fall hours Self-fertility of cultivar Flower self-fertility Flower self-fertility Visual observation of thrips Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips calyx on/off Presence of calyx at time of harvest Fruit Fruit calyx on/off Plant height Plant height measured in centimeters Plant height DNA/stdDNA Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Percent of fruit with rot color Leaf color Leaf Color of leaves in fall Plant Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug stinkbug Plant stinkbug Fruit peonidin glucoside Fruit peonidin glucoside Peonidin glucoside content Survey of fruit texture on a scale Rating of mature fruit texture Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin arabinoside content 1-3 scale cluster tightness mg/100 g Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas blight death Flower Flower blight death Bud Bud cold damage The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) cold damage Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Effectiveness of self-pollination Count of numer of berries per cup Count of number of berries per cup SWD oviposition success index scale Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale Fruit SWD resistance, oviposition success index count Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Visual observation of insect presence Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Plant exobasidium spot Plant exobasidium spot Root Susceptibility to white grubs Root white grubs white grubs Procyanidin-B1 content procyanidin-B1 content Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Fruit Percent of dead buds from frost damage Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Percent of rotted fruit Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. mg/mL Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Citric acid content Plant first ripe first ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Plant Fruit late green late green Timing of late green fruit Fruit count algal blotch Stem Susceptibility to algal stem blotch Stem algal blotch ease of release Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant Fruit ease of release Fruit Peonidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. penetration time Fruit Time elapsed for pentration Fruit penetration time Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm cherry worm Fruit cherry worm Fruit Percent of flowers which have died due to disease Percent of dead flowers Fruit Fruit alternaria rot alternaria rot Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight method_of Durability of bloom Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched cm2 Rating of fruit crispness/texture Characteristic of fruit when bite into Visual survey of fruit color Color of fruit Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Visual observation of plum curculio Percent of fruit set on the plant measured Percent fruit set Fruit Fruit chlorogenic acid chlorogenic acid Chlorogenic acid content SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Plant aphids Susceptibility to aphids aphids Plant Fruit plum curculio Fruit plum curculio Susceptibility to plum curculio yield Plant yield Plant yield Plant monopodial Monopodial growth habit Stem Stem monopodial Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured Percent of repeat bloom firmness, measured Fruit firmness, measured Fruit Firmness of fruit measurement Fruit firmness retention-bush firmness retention-bush Fruit Retention of fruit firmness while on bush Plant Plant repeat bloom Percent repeat bloom repeat bloom Visual observation of blueberry stunt Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Fruit rot presence or absence g/L Procyanidin-B2 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer average fruit firmness, measured Fruit average fruit firmness, measured delphinidin glucoside Fruit delphinidin glucoside Fruit Delphinidin glucoside content Amount of winter damage on scale Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. appearance Fruit Attractiveness of fruit appearance Fruit appearance mm Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Percent of fruit that split from water 1-9 scale fruit crispness Rating of fruit decay after storage Visual rating of fruit decay Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Amount of bloom leafhoper Leaf Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper Leaf leafhoper Fruit anthracnose rot anthracnose rot Fruit Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot 1-9 scale fruit color Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Plant first bloom Plant first bloom buds/cane width Plant Plant width measured in centimeters Plant width Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) bloom durability Fruit bloom durability The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Number of seeds per fruit Average number of seeds per fruit pollination rate Flower pollination rate Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations Flower Flower color flower color Color of flowers Flower Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size Bud size Bud size Fruit petunidin galactoside content petunidin galactoside content Fruit Petunidin galactoside content Susceptibility to stem canker canker Stem canker Stem Days to 50% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Sucrose content 1-3 scale plant vigor Kaempferol glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 0-5Index height x width measurement cm2 Computation of bush size based on height and width in January Fruit Total acid content total acid content Fruit total acid content Fruit quercetin arabinoside content Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content quercetin arabinoside content Fruit Visual rating of cluster tightness Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 Root nematodes nematodes Susceptibility to nematodes Root soluble solids Fruit soluble solids Fruit Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids Fruit total anthocyanin content Fruit total anthocyanin content Total anthocyanin in fruit Fruit myricetin glucoside Fruit myricetin glucoside Myricetin 3-glucoside content Visual observation of aphids Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content Fruit kaempferol glucoside kaempferol glucoside Fruit Brix reading from 20 fruit Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit petunidin glucoside content petunidin glucoside content Petunidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit Fruit delphinidin galactoside Delphinidin galactoside content delphinidin galactoside Percent soluble solids Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Rating of fruit firmness early green Timing of early green fruit Fruit early green Fruit Fruit Fruit malvidin galactoside content Malvidin galactoside content malvidin galactoside content Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Reaction to leaf rust Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit bloom amount Fruit bloom amount Ferulic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness Fruit Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits 0-1 color scale A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Plant growth and yield due to soil Fungal lesion size lesion size Stem lesion size Stem ms Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Malvidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance Plant Plant 50% bloom 50% bloom Number of days to 50% bloom Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Cyanidin arabinoside content 0-9 color scale pH of fruit juice Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Glucose content Fruit Titratable acidity of juice Juice titratable acidity Fruit Juice titratable acidity Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). 1-10 scale winter hardiness Epi-catechin content Fruit epi-catechin Fruit epi-catechin Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. Average diameter of 30 fruits Fruit diameter Average diameter of fruit Fruit diameter Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Visual observation of stem gall wasp Susceptibility to blueberry stunt Plant stunt Plant stunt mg/L Quercetin rutinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight sucrose content Fruit Fruit sucrose content Sucrose content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Epi-catechin content 1-9 scale fruit size Plant mineral soil adaptation index mineral soil adaptation index Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Plant g/100 mL Petunidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight kg Fruit Fruit blue/ripe blue/ripe Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit Measurement of pollen germination rate Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number Bud gall midge gall midge Susceptibility to gall midge Bud 1-9 scale uniform ripening mg/100 g of fresh weight Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer height x width measurement cm2 Visual observation of stem canker Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample Average diameter of 20 fruits Brix reading from fruit sample Measured from juice from a berry sample Plant fruit set Percent fruit set Plant fruit set Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker blight-canker Plant Plant blight-canker scale insects Stem scale insects Susceptibility to scale insects Stem Peonidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Fruit malic acid content Malic acid content malic acid content Fruit color after wax removal color - wax removed Fruit color - wax removed Fruit Plant upright flowers upright flowers Numer of upright flowers Plant growth index 1-9 scale fruit UV damange Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Visual observation of nematodes Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Bud Bud winter hardiness winter hardiness Measurement of damage from winter weather Fruit UV damage Amount of UV damage on fruit Fruit UV damage 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing date Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers Visual observation of stem borers Texture of mature fruit Fruit texture Fruit texture brix Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot Root phytophthora rot Root phytophthora rot Phenolic acid content Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. cm Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Myricetin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-9 scale growth habit expansion Timing of shoot expansion Shoot expansion Shoot Uniformity of bud size Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Visual rating of fruit yield Rating of yield on a scale germination rate Pollen germination rate Pollen germination rate Pollen Measurement of plant height Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January 1-9 scale Chill unit measurement Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. flavor Fruit Fruit flavor Rating of the fruit flavor Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Caffeic acid content Fruit Fruit flavor-bush flavor-bush Retention of fruit flavor while on bush Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm Fructose content fructose content Fruit fructose content Fruit Fruit cranberry worm Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm Fruit cranberry worm Flavonol content Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set pH Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit ring blotch Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus Plant ring blotch Plant Fruit glucose content Fruit Glucose content glucose content D-glucose content Fruit Fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content Fruit caffeic acid Caffeic acid content caffeic acid Fruit thrips Susceptibility to flower thrips Flower thrips Flower Susceptibility to blueberry maggot maggot Fruit maggot Fruit malvidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit malvidin glucoside content Malvidin glucoside content Visual rating of overall fruit size Rating of fruit size Plant Number of days to 95% ripe 95% ripe Plant 95% ripe 1-9 scale leaf density chilling requirement Bud chilling requirement Chill units for 50% budbreak Bud Fruit total sugar content total sugar content Fruit Total sugar content Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Measurement of bud set Fruit Fruit picking scar Size rating of picking scar on fruit picking scar Percent of dead buds due to winter damage Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Visual observation of white grubs Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus scorch virus Plant scorch virus Plant Plant Plant true to type true to type Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers Fruit Fruit peonidin galactoside Peonidin galactoside content peonidin galactoside Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight crispness Texture of fruit Fruit Fruit crispness bud set Plant Number of buds per cane Plant bud set Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Fruit quercetin rutinoside content flavor, 1-9 scale Fruit Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Average weight of 30 fruits Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin arabinoside content Visual rating of fruit appearance Rating of fruit appearance Total sugar content measured in Brix Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Average time needed to penetrate fruits Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Amount of winter damage on stem Uniform ripening uniform ripening Fruit uniform ripening Fruit Stem phomopsis blight phomopsis blight Stem Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight Peonidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of algal stem blotch Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch peonidin arabinoside Peonidin arabinoside content Fruit peonidin arabinoside Fruit Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Visual observation of disease presence 1-3 scale Fruit Citric acid content Fruit citric acid content citric acid content Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Visual observation of phytophthora root rot order of leaf and bloom emergence 1-9 scale fruit ease of release 1-9 scale fruit decay Plant BLSHV symptoms development time BLSHV symptoms development time Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin arabinoside content Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Visual observation of exobasidium spot Flavanol content Fruit Fruit flavanol content flavanol content Petunidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fructose content Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Blueberry Shock Virus presence Stem borers Stem borers Susceptibility to stem borers One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count Phenolic acid content phenolic acid Fruit phenolic acid Fruit g/mm storage decay Fruit storage decay Fruit Amount of fruit decay after storage Malic acid content Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) Plant vigor vigor Plant Plant vigor 0-10 scale winter damage Quercetin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush pH Fruit pH of juice from fruit Fruit pH Procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit SWD oviposition success index count SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale Fruit Fruit SWD oviposition success index count Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit 1-9 scale fruit firmness 1-9 scale fruit appearance Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening green fruit drop Fruit green fruit drop Fruit 1-3 scale pollen germination rate percent Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin glucoside content Fruit SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant DNA ratio Plant DNA ratio Plant Fruit Fruit catechin catechin Catechin content Plant Plant leafhopper resistance Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis leafhopper resistance Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) 5% ripe Number of days to 5% ripe Plant Plant 5% ripe Development time in years Chlorogenic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit cyanidin galactoside cyanidin galactoside Cyanidin galactoside content Fruit Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Total phenolics content Number of upright flowers on the plant measured Number of upright flowers Cyanidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax Yield per acre as measured Measurement of yield per acre Measurement of damage from winter weather Stem winter damage winter damage Stem number per cup Number of berries per cup Fruit number per cup Fruit Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Bud Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds Bud frost damage frost damage color Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit Fruit color 1-9 scale fruit flavor Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite 1-9 scale cluster tightness 1-9 scale fruit texture delphinidin arabinoside Fruit Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Delphinidin arabinoside content Petunidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Shoot Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight mummy berry blight susceptibility Visual observation of scale insects Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Measurement of plant width in centimeters Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January Plant BLSHV sensitivity ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus BLSHV sensitivity Plant 0-3 scale Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Days to 5% ripe Plant leaf to bloom ratio leaf to bloom ratio Plant Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Malvidin arabinoside content Percent of fruit that split after setting in water Fruit Fruit splitting after wetting splitting after wetting Fruit ferulic acid Ferulic acid content Fruit ferulic acid Delphinidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Number of days to 50% re-bloom 50% re-bloom Plant Plant 50% re-bloom Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Stem Stem gall wasp gall wasp Susceptibility to stem gall wasp Fruit size rated on a scale Fruit size Fruit size Rating of plant growth habit Visual rating of plant growth habit SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit SWD antibiosis Fruit SWD antibiosis Fruit Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Rating of calyx presence Cyanidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Flavanol content Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Color of leaves during autumn weather Observed color of leaves in autumn Plant Numer of upright berries Plant upright berries upright berries Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker 1-9 scale plant vigor Days to 95% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season temperature in celsius 0-9 scale fruit flavor days Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer 1-5 index Fruit Average weight of fruit Fruit weight weight Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Days to 50% bloom firmness, scale Fruit Firmness of fruit estimation Fruit firmness, scale Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured Percent of fruit rot scale_of Stem lesion size Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) seed count Fruit Fruit seed count Average seed count per fruit Procyanidin-B1 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Plant Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) Plant full bloom full bloom Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin glucoside content 50% ripe Plant Plant 50% ripe Number of days to 50% ripe Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content syrengitin 3-glucoside content Syringetin 3-glucoside content Fruit Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest Plant BLSHV presence Plant BLSHV presence fruit number Plant Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Plant fruit number Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. D-glucose content Observed color of blooms Color of flowers recorded using available list SWD adult mortality Fruit SWD adult mortality percent Fruit SWD adult mortality growth habit Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Plant growth habit Plant Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer total phenolics content Fruit total phenolics content Fruit grams variable_of Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 Visual rating of plant vigor 1-9 scale fruit yield Fruit rot rot Fruit Percent of fruit rot Measurement of yield per plant Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype bush size Plant bush size Plant Size of bush in January Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge N Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Number of upright berries bacterial scorch Leaf Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch Leaf bacterial scorch Percent of shoots with blight Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Bud mite Bud mite Susceptibility to bud mite Petunidin arabinoside content petunidin arabinoside content Fruit Fruit petunidin arabinoside content flavonol content Flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Fruit Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom Days to 50% re-bloom Total acid content Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. 1-9 scale fruit picking scar Amount of UV damage Visual rating of UV damage on fruit 1-9 scale calyx Fruit cyanidin glucoside Cyanidin glucoside content cyanidin glucoside Fruit