USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGLC Blueberry consortium PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) 8.0 ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 Blueberry consortium ANFR USDA-ARS DAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count SWDVEPF STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 STB Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS POLGR GRIN-Vaccinium POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale Blueberry consortium 50RB USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RB_50%ReBloom_day Blueberry consortium TADA Blueberry consortium TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRSC FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL LGF_LateGreenFruit_date Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL LGF TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g Blueberry consortium TAC2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL TOTAC Blueberry consortium TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL EGF EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium PLHGT 1.0 mush semi firm 5.0 7.0 15% difficult to remove CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g CYGLC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 USDA-ARS BMS 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 6.0 WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium WHBUD 1.0 weak Blueberry consortium FREASE FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL semi firm 5.0 BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 Blueberry consortium BLS USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium SSP_SolubleSolids_% SSP GRIN-Vaccinium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FWT2 FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g Blueberry consortium FRCL FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 90% willowy 2.0 8.0 dense canopy 7.0 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRFRM FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale Jeannie Rowland Blueberry consortium CRFW CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS 1.0 worst, heterogenous sizes 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 5.0 9.0 20% killed to the ground 15% rubs off 7.0 GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale GRH USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS CFW USDA-ARS-TCHSL PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g PHENAC Blueberry consortium 3.0 weak, 70% will die FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm Ebrahiem Babiker FRFRMMEAN USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium Ohio State University MINSOIL MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index 2.0 medium-loose FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% FRROT Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI KGC Blueberry consortium KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g 5.0 45% rubs off 3.0 moderately mush BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count BERRUPRGT Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium PLGRC PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm GRIN-Vaccinium DGLC DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 20% uniformly sized buds 4.0 USDA-ARS WGR WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 Blueberry consortium acronym Blueberry consortium ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 USDA-ARS ASTB USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g CYGAC Blueberry consortium 45% willowy 5.0 2.0 90% killed to the ground PF Jeannie Rowland PF_PetalFall_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date FRP Lowest 1.0 7.0 15% heterogeneous sizes 50RP_50%Ripe_day 50RP Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale FRSZ USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG3 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 FLBL FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 3.0 vigorous USDA-ARS-HCRL BSZ_BushSize_cm2 Blueberry consortium BSZ Blueberry consortium AGC AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL FIB FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms USDA-ARS-TCHSL Ebrahiem Babiker PENTMEAN USDA-ARS WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 Blueberry consortium WINM USDA-ARS-TCHSL LFD LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS NEM NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 Blueberry consortium 30% willowy 6.0 2.0 mostly mush 3.0 moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 9.0 extremely loose USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRCL2 FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRUCC FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g 60% willowy 4.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL SUCC Blueberry consortium SUCC_Sucrose_g/L Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research TA Blueberry consortium TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL no damage 10.0 crunch 8.0 8.0 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits FRDIA2 Ebrahiem Babiker FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm USDA-ARS-TCHSL PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm PLWTH USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix SS Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FC_Color_0-9scale GRIN-Vaccinium FC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% NFR 75% heterogeneous sizes 3.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRDMG FRDMG_FrostDamage_% USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date SHEXP GALL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 30% heterogeneous sizes 6.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI MGC Blueberry consortium MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 Blueberry consortium NRBV Blueberry consortium STCA STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL ECC ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI 4.0 semi mush black fruit 1.0 SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count SDN USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 SWDOSIS GRIN-Vaccinium 5.0 dark red fruit MAC MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS GLUCC Blueberry consortium GLUCC_Glucose_g/L SELF_SelfFertility_% SELF USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS FLTH 3.0 75% willowy Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRPH_FruitJuice_pH FRPH 6.0 above average vigorous (40% will die) USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BLSHVP BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 semi-loose canopy 3.0 QAC QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium MBFR Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% Blueberry consortium MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBBL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale FRCR CALYX CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BRF USDA-ARS-GIFVL BRF_75%Ripe_date Blueberry consortium 4.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS PHTB PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 2.0 90% buds destroyed USDA-ARS SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 Blueberry consortium SCALE YIELDACRE_Yield_kg GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium YIELDACRE STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 STGW Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS attribute 60% will die 4.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g CYAC Blueberry consortium CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL CLUSTER Blueberry consortium FRF2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale APH_SusToAphids_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS APH dark blue fruits 7.0 PAC PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 2.0 light resistance (30% resistant) 4.0 loose canopy ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium ALFR Blueberry consortium BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research BUDSZ Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BDMT BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 USDA-ARS-TCHSL VIG Blueberry consortium VIG_Vigor_1-9scale BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane BS2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDOSIC SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count 7.0 moderately loose FRFB USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 USDA-ARS-GIFVL BLOOM BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale Blueberry consortium PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGAC Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL FUB FUB_FullBloom_date Blueberry consortium ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 USDA-ARS ELFS BLMAG Blueberry consortium BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 USDA-ARS LBR Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-HCRL LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L CITAC 3.0 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 50B_50%Bloom_day 50B USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 9.0 attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact 3.0 75% damage 6.0 light red fruit 7.0 moderately vigoroug (30% will die) mostly firm 7.0 7.0 moderately high yield FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRF 95RP USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 95RP_95%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-TCHSL YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg Blueberry consortium YLDW 60% buds destroyed 5.0 2.0 moderately loose canopy moderatly firm 6.0 stays on 9.0 Blueberry consortium DGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium 5RP_5%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-GIFVL 5RP FRFRMB USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 45% decayed 5.0 GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium LC_Color_0-1scale LC 70% having calyx 3.0 BLSHVE GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 USDA-ARS BBC Blueberry consortium FLWRSUPRGT Blueberry consortium FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDRR SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count GRIN-Vaccinium 8.0 light blue fruits Blueberry consortium QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI QGC 5.0 45% heterogeneous sizes 50% uniformly sized buds 3.0 60% rubs off 4.0 CLUSTER2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm FRDIA Jeannie Rowland 2.0 very low yield MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium MONO 5.0 average vigorous, 50% will die light blue fruits 8.0 very tight 1.0 dark blue fruits 7.0 75% difficult to remove 3.0 average yield 5.0 9.0 stocky 6.0 slightly tart but good sweetness SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% Blueberry consortium SWDAMP GRIN-Vaccinium 5% rubs off 8.0 YLD USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g PEGLC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CR CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL 1.0 awful 6.0 40% having calyx 75% decayed 3.0 7.0 40% buds destroyed TA2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL average density canopy 5.0 1.0 all calyx dark purple fruit 3.0 Blueberry consortium SWDLPF SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count GRIN-Vaccinium 6.0 light red fruit Blueberry consortium GFRD USDA-ARS-HCRL GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 Blueberry consortium PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 USDA-ARS PRR 50% killed to the ground 6.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g Blueberry consortium PB2C 4.0 60% damage FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVANC Blueberry consortium balanced tartness and sweetness 5.0 FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRAP GRIN-Vaccinium FSP FSP_FruitSet_% Blueberry consortium 6.0 30% damage 7.0 short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) 2.0 80% having calyx HVSP USDA-ARS-HCRL HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale Blueberry consortium 4.0 70% killed to the ground 6.0 30% rubs off TTT USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium TTT_CultivarID_0/1 PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium PEGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL FT FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 3.0 still too tart WHWOOD Blueberry consortium Michigan State University WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale above average dense canopy 6.0 TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium TAC USDA-ARS USDA-ARS BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 Blueberry consortium BLSV Blueberry consortium LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index North Carolina State University-PHHI LHR MGLC MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PFRROT GRIN-Vaccinium PFRROT_FruitRot_% 2.0 90% rubs off 1.0 ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit 4.0 60% difficult to remove 9.0 too firm North Carolina State University-PHHI QRC Blueberry consortium QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g moderatly firm 6.0 GRIN-Vaccinium BLSHV Blueberry consortium BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year 2.0 weak, 80% will die FRFRM2 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N 3.0 80% buds destroyed 2.0 90% heterogeneous sizes PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEAC Blueberry consortium 45% damage 5.0 9.0 excellent VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale VIG2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium between or average 2.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL SS5 SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix 1.0 all decayed FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRD no damage 9.0 5.0 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet mostly firm 7.0 USDA-ARS BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 BLST Blueberry consortium FRSP_FruitSplit_% USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRSP Blueberry consortium BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BLODUR FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale FRUV USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium nice pop, optimal firmness 8.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L Blueberry consortium TPC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CHAC CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g 7.0 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 9.0 very vigorous (highest survival) USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGAC MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium SWDRI GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index 3.0 moderate resistance (45% resistant) loose (type 5) 5.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g CAC 60% having calyx 4.0 Blueberry consortium FAC FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI 40% killed to the ground 7.0 DNARATIO Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS2 SS2_TotSugar_brix Blueberry consortium 90% damage 2.0 9.0 very easy to remove 8.0 5% decayed 5% difficult to remove 8.0 Blueberry consortium SS3 USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix 20% having calyx 8.0 STBL STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-TCHSL LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale Blueberry consortium LRR low yield 3.0 semi firm 5.0 6.0 loose (type 6) 1.0 rubs off easily CC_Catechin_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI CC Blueberry consortium 3.0 4+ buds/cane 15% willowy 7.0 high yield, optimal 8.0 REPEATBLM GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS SNL SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 moderately soft 3.0 aluminum blue fruits 9.0 Highest 3.0 4.0 60% decayed Medium 2.0 9.0 small, dry 1.0 very soft Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MALAC MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L 5.0 maximum resistance (>80% resistant) 6.0 moderatly firm 4.0 slight too tart but acceptable POLR POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking 9.0 minimal resistance (15% resistant) 1.0 4.0 high resistance (75% resistant) all buds destroyed on bush 1.0 3.0 loose 30% buds destroyed 8.0 1.0 black fruit PB1C Blueberry consortium PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 4.0 1.0 less dense canopy entity 2.0 mostly tight Blueberry consortium FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count FRSZ2 GRIN-Vaccinium 7.0 15% decayed no decay 9.0 COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL COLDTL USDA-ARS-TCHSL SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index SWD Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium FWT FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g light purple fruit 4.0 6.0 above average yield mostly soft 2.0 2.0 2-3 buds/cane 9.0 20% buds destroyed 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet 6.0 mostly firm 7.0 5% damage 8.0 80% uniformly sized buds 2.0 sweetness overpowering 8.0 1.0 lots of damage BS USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVONC Blueberry consortium substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 5.0 USDA-ARS PC PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 Blueberry consortium 3.0 80% killed to the ground 1.0 dense 6.0 moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) 5% willowy 8.0 DGLUCC USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L Blueberry consortium 6.0 50% buds destroyed 8.0 30% killed to the ground 3.0 moderately tight 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness 5.0 half having calyx (50%) TA3 TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 10.0 no damage no calyx 9.0 vigorous (20% will die) 8.0 5% heterogeneous sizes 8.0 dark purple fruit 3.0 1.0 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) 2.0 very tart but sweetness 7.0 slightly tart but sweetness overpowering 5.0 dark red fruit 1.0 weak, most will die 3.0 75% rubs off 5.0 60% killed to the ground 1 bud/cane 1.0 4.0 semi-loose light black fruit 2.0 4.0 60% heterogeneous sizes 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet 8.0 2.0 light black fruit moderately dense canopy 7.0 4.0 70% buds destroyed 7.0 15% damage 9.0 very firm 1.0 mush 1.0 killed to the ground 2.0 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet 9.0 aluminum blue fruits 30% having calyx 7.0 2.0 90% decayed semi mush 4.0 4.0 light purple fruit 4.0 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 1.0 difficult to remove 6.0 30% decayed 2.0 mostly mush 4.0 moderately low yiedld Blueberry ontology no yield 1.0 willowy 1.0 8.0 mostly loose average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 5.0 9.0 short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) moderately mush 3.0 semi soft 4.0 best, homogeneous 9.0 6.0 30% difficult to remove 9.0 too firm 2.0 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 1.0 large, deep, torn skin, wet 9.0 very dense canopy uniformly sized buds 1.0 2.0 long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 5.0 45% difficult to remove 90% difficult to remove 2.0 Number of berries per cup Fruit number per cup number per cup Fruit Number of days to 5% ripe Plant 5% ripe 5% ripe Plant Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. SWD oviposition success index count Fruit Fruit SWD oviposition success index count SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds Bud frost damage Bud frost damage Fruit rot rot Percent of fruit rot Fruit Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Procyanidin-B1 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Ferulic acid content Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Fructose content 1-9 scale fruit color Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers Plant true to type Plant true to type kg ms Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm Fruit Fruit cherry worm cherry worm 1-9 scale fruit crispness Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) Visual observation of nematodes Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Measurement of damage from winter weather Stem Stem winter damage winter damage early green Timing of early green fruit Fruit early green Fruit Plant full bloom Plant Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) full bloom days Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Uniformity of bud size Fruit peonidin arabinoside Peonidin arabinoside content peonidin arabinoside Fruit Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. Stem lesion size Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer Percent soluble solids Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe Days to 95% ripe crispness Fruit Fruit crispness Texture of fruit Average number of seeds per fruit Number of seeds per fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Kaempferol glucoside content Fruit Fruit color - wax removed color - wax removed Fruit color after wax removal procyanidin-B2 content Procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Fruit Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Visual observation of plum curculio 1-9 scale fruit UV damange Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer height x width measurement cm2 Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Fruit storage decay Amount of fruit decay after storage Fruit storage decay g/100 mL Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January Leaf to bloom ratio 0/1 Chlorogenic acid content Fruit chlorogenic acid Fruit chlorogenic acid mg/100 g Attractiveness of fruit appearance Fruit appearance Fruit appearance Fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content D-glucose content Fruit SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. Percent of fruit with rot Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit Fruit color color 0-5Index 0-1 color scale Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Brix reading from 20 fruit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin glucoside content Procyanidin-B2 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit seed count seed count Average seed count per fruit Fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). height Plant height measured in centimeters Plant Plant height 1-9 scale fruit texture mg/L Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin glucoside content Visual observation of phytophthora root rot Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Brix reading from fruit sample Measured from juice from a berry sample Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Average weight of 25 fruits Fruit flavonol content Flavonol content flavonol content Fruit Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Citric acid content Measurement of bud set Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Fruit anthracnose rot anthracnose rot Fruit Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot Average weight of 30 fruits Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Fruit Fruit bloom durability The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit bloom durability Percent of fruit set on the plant measured Percent fruit set count Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper Fruit myricetin glucoside myricetin glucoside Myricetin 3-glucoside content Fruit Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. Bud Susceptibility to gall midge gall midge Bud gall midge Plant vigor Plant vigor Plant vigor Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavanol content Fruit maggot Susceptibility to blueberry maggot maggot Fruit Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Density of leaves in plant canopy Leaf density Leaf density scale insects Stem scale insects Stem Susceptibility to scale insects Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. Chill unit measurement Fruit petunidin glucoside content petunidin glucoside content Petunidin glucoside content Fruit hours Fruit fructose content Fructose content Fruit fructose content color Leaf Leaf color Color of leaves in fall canker Stem Stem canker Susceptibility to stem canker 0-9 color scale pH Fruit pH Fruit pH of juice from fruit Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations size Fruit size rated on a scale Fruit Fruit size aphids Susceptibility to aphids Plant Plant aphids Fruit blue/ripe Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit Fruit blue/ripe Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Flower pollination rate Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations pollination rate Flower bush size Size of bush in January Plant bush size Plant Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight Chill units for 50% budbreak Bud chilling requirement Bud chilling requirement Rating of fruit appearance Visual rating of fruit appearance Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Visual observation of scale insects blight-canker Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker Plant Plant blight-canker Visual observation of insect presence Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot penetration time Time elapsed for pentration Fruit penetration time Fruit Count of number of berries per cup Count of numer of berries per cup Measurement of yield per acre Yield per acre as measured plum curculio Fruit plum curculio Fruit Susceptibility to plum curculio Total acid content Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Plant fruit set Percent fruit set fruit set Plant Visual observation of blueberry stunt Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Fruit peonidin galactoside peonidin galactoside Fruit Peonidin galactoside content Days to 50% re-bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom Measurement of pollen germination rate Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number Malvidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit delphinidin galactoside Delphinidin galactoside content Fruit delphinidin galactoside 1-9 scale DNA/stdDNA Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off 1-9 scale uniform ripening g/L Fruit Fruit alternaria rot alternaria rot Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush temperature in celsius thrips Flower thrips Susceptibility to flower thrips Flower growth index Fruit splitting after wetting Fruit Percent of fruit that split after setting in water splitting after wetting mg/100 g of fresh weight Plant Plant yield yield Plant yield Firmness of fruit estimation firmness, scale Fruit firmness, scale Fruit Sucrose content sucrose content Fruit sucrose content Fruit Amount of bloom Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Cyanidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight upright flowers Numer of upright flowers Plant Plant upright flowers Leaf rust resistance Leaf rust resistance Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation Fruit SWD resistance, oviposition success index count Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index scale Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Days to 50% bloom Blueberry Shock Virus presence Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavonol content Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. 1-9 scale fruit appearance Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set 1-9 scale leaf density flavanol content Fruit flavanol content Flavanol content Fruit pH Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Fruit SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit Fruit SWD antibiosis SWD antibiosis Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin galactoside content Fruit epi-catechin Fruit epi-catechin Epi-catechin content Plant Plant BLSHV sensitivity ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus BLSHV sensitivity g/mm mm Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Number of upright berries Plant Plant 50% ripe 50% ripe Number of days to 50% ripe Total sugar content total sugar content Fruit total sugar content Fruit Root phytophthora rot Root phytophthora rot Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot N upright berries Numer of upright berries Plant upright berries Plant Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Visual rating of cluster tightness Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Delphinidin arabinoside content mg/mL Plant 95% ripe Number of days to 95% ripe Plant 95% ripe Plant Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant BLSHV symptoms development time BLSHV symptoms development time first bloom Plant first bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Plant Visual observation of thrips Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Fruit Fruit ease of release ease of release Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant Average time needed to penetrate fruits Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Bud mite Bud mite Susceptibility to bud mite Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 percent Plant Plant exobasidium spot Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot exobasidium spot Flower petal fall Timing of petal fall Flower petal fall Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin arabinoside content flavor Fruit flavor Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit uniform ripening Uniform ripening Fruit Fruit uniform ripening Malvidin arabinoside content Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content Petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content Stem gall wasp gall wasp Susceptibility to stem gall wasp Stem 1-9 scale fruit flavor bloom amount Fruit bloom amount Fruit Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Visual rating of overall fruit size Rating of fruit size Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Percent of fruit that split from water Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content Fruit Fruit kaempferol glucoside Visual observation of stem gall wasp Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Total phenolics content Measurement of plant height Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content quercetin arabinoside content Fruit Fruit quercetin arabinoside content 1-3 scale plant vigor Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit cyanidin galactoside Cyanidin galactoside content Fruit Fruit cyanidin galactoside flower color Flower Flower color Color of flowers Sucrose content Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Phenolic acid content Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. late green Fruit late green Timing of late green fruit Fruit Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January leaf to bloom ratio Plant Plant leaf to bloom ratio Plant 50% bloom Number of days to 50% bloom 50% bloom Plant Development time in years Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Fruit citric acid content citric acid content Citric acid content Fruit Texture of mature fruit texture Fruit Fruit texture Average diameter of 20 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample picking scar Size rating of picking scar on fruit Fruit Fruit picking scar Fruit Juice titratable acidity Juice titratable acidity Fruit Titratable acidity of juice Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers Visual observation of stem borers Plant Percent repeat bloom Plant repeat bloom repeat bloom Susceptibility to blueberry stunt Plant stunt Plant stunt Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Malic acid content Percent of repeat bloom Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured 1-9 scale fruit firmness Measurement of plant growth upright Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit SWD adult mortality Fruit Fruit SWD adult mortality SWD adult mortality percent Susceptibility to nematodes nematodes Root nematodes Root Amount of winter damage on stem Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Quercetin rutinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-5 index Leaf leafhoper Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper Leaf leafhoper Procyanidin-B1 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe Days to 5% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant Plant DNA ratio Plant DNA ratio Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Fruit Fruit quercetin galactoside content Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content quercetin galactoside content Myricetin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Observed color of blooms Color of flowers recorded using available list variable_of Fruit UV damage Amount of UV damage on fruit UV damage Fruit Fruit Fruit calyx on/off Presence of calyx at time of harvest calyx on/off Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Amount of UV damage Visual rating of UV damage on fruit cm2 Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Rating of calyx presence Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin arabinoside content Plant leafhopper resistance Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis Plant leafhopper resistance 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax Peonidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Observed color of leaves in autumn Color of leaves during autumn weather cold damage The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) Bud Bud cold damage Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Total sugar content measured in Brix Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Fruit delphinidin glucoside Fruit Delphinidin glucoside content delphinidin glucoside Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Effectiveness of self-pollination Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Days to 50% ripe Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index 0-10 scale winter damage Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Fruit rot presence or absence 0-3 scale algal blotch Stem Susceptibility to algal stem blotch Stem algal blotch Reaction to leaf rust Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus 1-5 bud size scale Delphinidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm Visual observation of cherry worm Petunidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 date 1-9 scale fruit decay 50% re-bloom Plant Number of days to 50% re-bloom Plant 50% re-bloom germination rate Pollen Pollen germination rate Pollen germination rate Plant growth habit growth habit Plant Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Glucose content Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Plant mineral soil adaptation index Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Plant mineral soil adaptation index Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus Plant ring blotch Plant ring blotch Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Fruit Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot mummy berry rot susceptibility Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Rating of fruit firmness Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Fruit Ferulic acid content Fruit ferulic acid ferulic acid Phenolic acid content Fruit phenolic acid phenolic acid Fruit 1-10 scale winter hardiness cyanidin arabinoside Cyanidin arabinoside content Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Fruit Fruit Fruit malic acid content Malic acid content malic acid content Caffeic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit total phenolics content Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer Fruit total phenolics content Flower Self-fertility of cultivar Flower self-fertility self-fertility 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance Flower Flower blight death Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas blight death catechin Catechin content Fruit catechin Fruit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin arabinoside content Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids Fruit soluble solids soluble solids Fruit Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest Plant BLSHV presence BLSHV presence Plant petunidin arabinoside content Fruit petunidin arabinoside content Petunidin arabinoside content Fruit size Bud Bud size Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size Percent of fruit rot Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured Visual rating of picking scar on fruit Rating of picking scar Delphinidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. Average diameter of 30 fruits 1-9 scale growth habit Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 1-9 scale fruit yield 1-3 scale pollen germination rate Stem lesion size Stem lesion size Fungal lesion size Fruit weight Fruit weight Average weight of fruit Plant growth and yield due to soil A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. 1-9 scale plant vigor stinkbug Plant Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug Plant stinkbug Rating of fruit crispness/texture Characteristic of fruit when bite into Measurement of yield per plant Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype 1-9 scale calyx Durability of bloom Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched Cyanidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Bud winter hardiness Bud Measurement of damage from winter weather winter hardiness Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Percent of dead buds due to winter damage 1-3 scale Survey of fruit texture on a scale Rating of mature fruit texture Total anthocyanin in fruit Fruit total anthocyanin content total anthocyanin content Fruit Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample order of leaf and bloom emergence Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Color of fruit Visual survey of fruit color D-glucose content D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. 1-9 scale fruit picking scar 1-3 scale cluster tightness Plant bud set bud set Number of buds per cane Plant Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Percent of dead buds from frost damage Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Plant fruit number Plant Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations fruit number Shoot expansion Shoot expansion Timing of shoot expansion Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Percent of shoots with blight One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale Fruit SWD reproductive rate SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate first ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Plant Plant first ripe Amount of winter damage on scale Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing 1-9 scale fruit ease of release SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit Visual rating of fruit decay Rating of fruit decay after storage mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit peonidin glucoside Fruit peonidin glucoside Fruit Peonidin glucoside content Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH method_of Syringetin 3-glucoside content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content bacterial scorch Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch Leaf bacterial scorch Leaf Fruit cluster tightness Fruit Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits cluster tightness brix Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin arabinoside content Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). scorch virus Plant Plant scorch virus Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Visual observation of exobasidium spot 0-10 index Fruit caffeic acid Fruit caffeic acid Caffeic acid content cm Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. pH of fruit juice Retention of fruit firmness while on bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Fruit firmness, measured Fruit Firmness of fruit measurement firmness, measured Monopodial growth habit monopodial Stem monopodial Stem malvidin glucoside content Fruit Malvidin glucoside content Fruit malvidin glucoside content Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Number of upright flowers Number of upright flowers on the plant measured Chlorogenic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Visual observation of aphids Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January Measurement of plant width in centimeters Susceptibility to stem borers Stem Stem borers borers Visual observation of disease presence Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Computation of bush size based on height and width in January height x width measurement cm2 Plant width measured in centimeters width Plant width Plant Visual rating of plant growth habit Rating of plant growth habit Fruit Fruit malvidin galactoside content malvidin galactoside content Malvidin galactoside content Total acid content total acid content Fruit Fruit total acid content Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 Visual rating of cluster tightness Retention of fruit flavor while on bush Fruit flavor-bush Fruit flavor-bush Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer Fruit average fruit firmness, measured average fruit firmness, measured Fruit Percent of dead flowers Percent of flowers which have died due to disease Epi-catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight glucose content Fruit glucose content Fruit Glucose content A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding 1-9 scale cluster tightness Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker Visual observation of stem canker cranberry worm Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm Fruit cranberry worm Fruit Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept buds/cane Fruit Fruit diameter Average diameter of fruit diameter Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 phomopsis blight Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight Stem phomopsis blight Stem grams Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch Visual observation of algal stem blotch Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. 1-9 scale fruit size cyanidin glucoside Fruit cyanidin glucoside Cyanidin glucoside content Fruit winter moth Susceptibility to winter moth Bud winter moth Bud Visual observation of white grubs Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Rating of yield on a scale Visual rating of fruit yield 0-9 scale fruit flavor Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin galactoside content Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Fruit green fruit drop Fruit Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening green fruit drop Root white grubs Susceptibility to white grubs Root white grubs Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. Percent of rotted fruit scale_of