USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRDMG Blueberry consortium FRDMG_FrostDamage_% CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL CALYX Blueberry consortium PGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium CYGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium PB2C PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI semi firm 5.0 GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FSP_FruitSet_% FSP low yield 3.0 80% killed to the ground 3.0 TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium TA2 USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm FRDIA Jeannie Rowland dark blue fruits 7.0 GFRD GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 8.0 sweetness overpowering Blueberry consortium FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% FLBL USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium PLWTH PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm 2.0 mostly tight Blueberry consortium CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g CYAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL BERRUPRGT BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index SWDRI Blueberry consortium SWD SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index USDA-ARS-TCHSL light blue fruits 8.0 LGF Blueberry consortium LGF_LateGreenFruit_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CAC CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g MINSOIL Blueberry consortium MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index Ohio State University 45% decayed 5.0 TADA Blueberry consortium TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL USDA-ARS-TCHSL MONO USDA-ARS-HCRL MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 Blueberry consortium 45% difficult to remove 5.0 Michigan State University Blueberry consortium WHWOOD WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale Blueberry consortium FLAVANC FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium MBBL Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm FRDIA2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Ebrahiem Babiker Blueberry consortium FWT2 FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g USDA-ARS-TCHSL BSZ_BushSize_cm2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BSZ SWDVEPF SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium YLDW USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg USDA-ARS ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 ELFS Blueberry consortium FRF2 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FRSC FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL 50B 50B_50%Bloom_day USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 9.0 small, dry USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium HVSP HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale Jeannie Rowland SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL SHEXP TPC USDA-ARS-TCHSL TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L Blueberry consortium Blueberry ontology 2.0 mostly mush Blueberry consortium QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI QAC 2.0 medium-loose PAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium MAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g 80% having calyx 2.0 40% killed to the ground 7.0 VIG2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale Blueberry consortium DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g DAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRFRM2 USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N Jeannie Rowland BLSHVE BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 USDA-ARS BLS light black fruit 2.0 8.0 20% having calyx USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FLAVONC FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g GRIN-Vaccinium LC_Color_0-1scale Blueberry consortium LC FRPH FRPH_FruitJuice_pH USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale WHBUD USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRSZ2 FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 FRFRMB USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS3 Blueberry consortium SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix 50% killed to the ground 6.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count SDN PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium PB1C LFD USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale 60% will die 4.0 6.0 30% willowy uniformly sized buds 1.0 FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count Blueberry consortium FLWRSUPRGT GRIN-Vaccinium WINM USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 VIG3 VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium STBL too firm 9.0 Blueberry consortium BMS BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL BRF BRF_75%Ripe_date maximum resistance (>80% resistant) 5.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI AGC Blueberry consortium AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g BS BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium TA3 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL 1.0 less dense canopy FUB_FullBloom_date FUB Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium BUDSZ BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale 3.0 75% willowy Ebrahiem Babiker PENTMEAN PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms USDA-ARS-TCHSL semi firm 5.0 CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS CRFW Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS NEM Blueberry consortium NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 5% heterogeneous sizes 8.0 FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRSZ 3.0 75% heterogeneous sizes Blueberry consortium FRCR FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL SNL USDA-ARS SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium BLSHVP BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BDMT BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 Blueberry consortium SS2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS2_TotSugar_brix SUCC SUCC_Sucrose_g/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 9.0 excellent YIELDACRE YIELDACRE_Yield_kg Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 GALL USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm FRFRMMEAN Ebrahiem Babiker Blueberry consortium BLODUR BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIC Blueberry consortium nice pop, optimal firmness 8.0 Blueberry consortium APH_SusToAphids_0/1 APH USDA-ARS 2.0 2-3 buds/cane PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium PLGRC STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 STGW USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium 4.0 light purple fruit slight too tart but acceptable 4.0 60% willowy 4.0 75% difficult to remove 3.0 1.0 weak GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDRR SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count USDA-ARS TAC TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium 80% uniformly sized buds 2.0 7.0 15% difficult to remove MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium MGLC awful 1.0 SELF USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium SELF_SelfFertility_% very easy to remove 9.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS FLTH FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g FWT Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL loose canopy 4.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g KGC Blueberry consortium no decay 9.0 Blueberry consortium QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI QRC PF PF_PetalFall_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland Blueberry consortium 50RB_50%ReBloom_day 50RB USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date FIB 1.0 all buds destroyed on bush FT FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium SCALE USDA-ARS SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 Blueberry consortium 90% killed to the ground 2.0 LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL LRR Blueberry consortium COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL COLDTL POLR USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% 40% buds destroyed 7.0 3.0 75% rubs off 5.0 45% willowy FAC FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet 8.0 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness semi soft 4.0 acronym BLMAG Blueberry consortium BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 USDA-ARS 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 6.0 60% decayed 4.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium DGLC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g CHAC TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TAC2 9.0 very vigorous (highest survival) FRD USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale VIG_Vigor_1-9scale VIG USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium LHR LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index no damage 9.0 weak, 70% will die 3.0 75% damage 3.0 2.0 90% buds destroyed USDA-ARS ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 Blueberry consortium ALFR stocky 9.0 60% killed to the ground 5.0 FRP FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium PRR Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g QGC 1.0 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TOTAC TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGAC Blueberry consortium CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g aluminum blue fruits 9.0 EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date EGF Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL 5RP_5%Ripe_day 5RP USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium 4.0 semi mush BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BLST semi-loose 4.0 90% damage 2.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RP 50RP_50%Ripe_day Blueberry consortium moderate resistance (45% resistant) 3.0 FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRAP 3.0 50% uniformly sized buds Blueberry consortium PHTB USDA-ARS PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 NRBV NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium ANFR PEAC Blueberry consortium PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL GRH USDA-ARS-HCRL GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale Blueberry consortium CC_Catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium CC North Carolina State University-PHHI PHENAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g 5.0 average yield 9.0 best, homogeneous 15% rubs off 7.0 7.0 moderately dense canopy 1.0 black fruit USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale Jeannie Rowland FRFRM Blueberry consortium CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour USDA-ARS-GIFVL CR Blueberry consortium MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL MALAC SS5 Blueberry consortium SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix USDA-ARS-GIFVL BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year GRIN-Vaccinium BLSHV Blueberry consortium dark blue fruits 7.0 LBR USDA-ARS-HCRL LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale Ebrahiem Babiker DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGLUCC Blueberry consortium light resistance (30% resistant) 2.0 MGAC MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) 8.0 80% buds destroyed 3.0 5.0 average density canopy USDA-ARS BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 BBC Blueberry consortium no damage 10.0 7.0 mostly firm FC_Color_0-9scale FC GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium GLUCC USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium GLUCC_Glucose_g/L PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium PC BS2 USDA-ARS-HCRL BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane Blueberry consortium very tight 1.0 Blueberry consortium MBFR MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research 20% uniformly sized buds 4.0 killed to the ground 1.0 Blueberry consortium DGAC DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL 1.0 difficult to remove 6.0 slightly tart but good sweetness no yield 1.0 2.0 90% decayed Blueberry consortium DNARATIO DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA GRIN-Vaccinium vigorous 3.0 7.0 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 95RP_95%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-HCRL 95RP Blueberry consortium PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium PLHGT 45% damage 5.0 30% difficult to remove 6.0 Blueberry consortium FRSP FRSP_FruitSplit_% USDA-ARS-TCHSL 3.0 moderately tight Blueberry consortium MGC North Carolina State University-PHHI MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 5.0 light black fruit 2.0 3.0 dark purple fruit FRCL2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale Blueberry consortium BLSV BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 USDA-ARS 5% difficult to remove 8.0 30% buds destroyed 8.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium PEGLC Blueberry consortium BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale USDA-ARS-GIFVL BLOOM USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium TTT_CultivarID_0/1 TTT 5.0 loose (type 5) all decayed 1.0 8.0 5% decayed 8.0 30% killed to the ground short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 9.0 4.0 semi mush loose 3.0 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 5.0 PFRROT GRIN-Vaccinium PFRROT_FruitRot_% Blueberry consortium 6.0 30% heterogeneous sizes Blueberry consortium CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale CLUSTER2 USDA-ARS-HCRL attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact 9.0 1.0 weak, most will die 3.0 moderately mush 75% decayed 3.0 Blueberry consortium CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale CLUSTER USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 WGR PEGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-HCRL FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 FRFB Blueberry consortium 1.0 black fruit 7.0 slightly tart but sweetness overpowering SWDAMP SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium willowy 1.0 light purple fruit 4.0 Blueberry consortium TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research TA 90% willowy 2.0 60% buds destroyed 5.0 2.0 90% heterogeneous sizes very firm 9.0 REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% GRIN-Vaccinium REPEATBLM Blueberry consortium 5.0 45% rubs off 30% decayed 6.0 FRUCC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g 5% willowy 8.0 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 5.0 6.0 above average yield 4.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 ASTB USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium mostly loose 8.0 GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDOSIS SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium YLD YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRF FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale above average vigorous (40% will die) 6.0 7.0 15% decayed 9.0 no calyx 7.0 mostly firm 3.0 Highest 20% buds destroyed 9.0 moderatly firm 6.0 GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SSP SSP_SolubleSolids_% above average dense canopy 6.0 Blueberry consortium SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count SWDLPF GRIN-Vaccinium 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet 7.0 4.0 70% killed to the ground 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 loose (type 6) 6.0 45% heterogeneous sizes 5.0 Blueberry consortium NFR USDA-ARS-HCRL NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS CFW Blueberry consortium 4.0 60% rubs off 2.0 very low yield very tart but sweetness 2.0 very soft 1.0 FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% FRROT Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium 9.0 20% killed to the ground 1.0 1 bud/cane mostly mush 2.0 3.0 semi-loose canopy ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI ECC Blueberry consortium 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet 6.0 STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 Blueberry consortium STCA USDA-ARS-HCRL STB Blueberry consortium STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 USDA-ARS FREASE USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRCL 2.0 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet worst, heterogenous sizes 1.0 30% rubs off 6.0 4+ buds/cane 3.0 2.0 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 5.0 balanced tartness and sweetness SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research SS dense canopy 8.0 2.0 long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 7.0 15% heterogeneous sizes 7.0 mostly firm 3.0 moderately mush half having calyx (50%) 5.0 moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 3.0 9.0 overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking Blueberry consortium CITAC CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL no damage 10.0 GRIN-Vaccinium POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale Blueberry consortium POLGR 30% damage 6.0 8.0 crunch FRUV USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale too firm 9.0 moderately low yiedld 4.0 7.0 moderately loose 40% having calyx 6.0 9.0 extremely loose 3.0 70% having calyx USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGAC Blueberry consortium PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g 1.0 all calyx 6.0 moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) 90% difficult to remove 2.0 large, deep, torn skin, wet 1.0 moderatly firm 6.0 2.0 weak, 80% will die stays on 9.0 3.0 still too tart 4.0 60% having calyx moderately loose canopy 2.0 50% buds destroyed 6.0 4.0 70% buds destroyed semi firm 5.0 1.0 minimal resistance (15% resistant) 9.0 aluminum blue fruits 8.0 high yield, optimal 1.0 lots of damage 9.0 very dense canopy light blue fruits 8.0 7.0 moderately vigoroug (30% will die) 3.0 moderately soft 15% damage 7.0 4.0 high resistance (75% resistant) 3.0 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 2.0 Medium 60% difficult to remove 4.0 4.0 above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) average vigorous, 50% will die 5.0 light red fruit 6.0 15% willowy 7.0 2.0 90% rubs off 7.0 moderately high yield 1.0 rubs off easily 1.0 dense dark purple fruit 3.0 8.0 vigorous (20% will die) 5.0 substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 8.0 5% damage 4.0 60% damage 2.0 between or average 6.0 light red fruit entity 8.0 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits attribute 1.0 Lowest mostly soft 2.0 ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit 1.0 7.0 short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) 1.0 mush 30% having calyx 7.0 3.0 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet dark red fruit 5.0 8.0 5% rubs off 5.0 dark red fruit 1.0 mush moderatly firm 6.0 4.0 60% heterogeneous sizes mg/100 g of fresh weight order of leaf and bloom emergence Susceptibility to flower thrips Flower thrips Flower thrips Fruit Fruit texture texture Texture of mature fruit Stem lesion size Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. Visual survey of fruit color Color of fruit Petunidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight mg/100 g Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Plant fruit number Plant fruit number Fruit Total anthocyanin in fruit total anthocyanin content Fruit total anthocyanin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin glucoside content Epi-catechin content Fruit epi-catechin Fruit epi-catechin delphinidin arabinoside Delphinidin arabinoside content Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Fruit Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Glucose content Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Measurement of plant growth upright Fruit peonidin glucoside Peonidin glucoside content Fruit peonidin glucoside Days to 50% re-bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample Average diameter of 20 fruits Fruit cyanidin galactoside Cyanidin galactoside content Fruit cyanidin galactoside Visual rating of plant growth habit Rating of plant growth habit Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Visual observation of white grubs Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Percent of dead buds due to winter damage percent Caffeic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight firmness, measured Fruit Fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit measurement 0-5Index Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin arabinoside content Fruit appearance appearance Attractiveness of fruit appearance Fruit 0/1 Fruit average fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer average fruit firmness, measured Fruit fruit set Plant fruit set Percent fruit set Plant count Texture of fruit Fruit crispness crispness Fruit 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit SWD antibiosis Fruit Fruit SWD antibiosis Fruit malvidin arabinoside content malvidin arabinoside content Fruit Malvidin arabinoside content Citric acid content Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Visual observation of plum curculio chilling requirement Bud Bud chilling requirement Chill units for 50% budbreak gall midge Bud Bud gall midge Susceptibility to gall midge Count of numer of berries per cup Count of number of berries per cup Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight mg/L mummy berry rot susceptibility Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot Fruit Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH Quercetin rutinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Fruit bloom amount Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit bloom amount Flower Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations pollination rate Flower pollination rate winter moth Susceptibility to winter moth Bud winter moth Bud petunidin galactoside content Fruit Petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content cm2 Susceptibility to blueberry maggot Fruit maggot maggot Fruit Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Amount of winter damage on stem Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content Fruit Fruit quercetin arabinoside content quercetin arabinoside content Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Fruit Fruit malic acid content malic acid content Malic acid content Rating of fruit decay after storage Visual rating of fruit decay Bud Bud mite Susceptibility to bud mite mite Fruit Fruit alternaria rot Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot alternaria rot Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot Root Root phytophthora rot phytophthora rot Total phenolics content Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Stem algal blotch Susceptibility to algal stem blotch algal blotch Stem Fruit malvidin glucoside content Fruit malvidin glucoside content Malvidin glucoside content Visual rating of picking scar on fruit Rating of picking scar Fruit SWD resistance, oviposition success index count SWD oviposition success index scale Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale date Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Visual rating of plant vigor Presence of calyx at time of harvest Fruit Fruit calyx on/off calyx on/off color Fruit color Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit Plant Plant first bloom first bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) cold damage Bud Bud cold damage The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Fruit Fruit firmness, scale Firmness of fruit estimation firmness, scale Number of days to 95% ripe Plant Plant 95% ripe 95% ripe Fruit delphinidin galactoside Delphinidin galactoside content Fruit delphinidin galactoside Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush 0-9 color scale Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Visual observation of phytophthora root rot Days to 50% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Fruit Fruit plum curculio plum curculio Susceptibility to plum curculio frost damage Bud frost damage Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds Bud stunt Susceptibility to blueberry stunt Plant Plant stunt self-fertility Flower Self-fertility of cultivar Flower self-fertility Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin glucoside content 1-9 scale calyx Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Plant Plant repeat bloom repeat bloom Percent repeat bloom Fruit penetration time Fruit Time elapsed for pentration penetration time Myricetin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Fruit caffeic acid Caffeic acid content caffeic acid Percent of shoots with blight Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin galactoside content Chill unit measurement Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. catechin Fruit catechin Catechin content Fruit 1-9 scale fruit color Flavonol content Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Epi-catechin content Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Visual observation of insect presence Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Peonidin arabinoside content peonidin arabinoside Fruit peonidin arabinoside Fruit Color of leaves in fall Leaf color color Leaf Plant vigor vigor Plant vigor Plant Procyanidin-B1 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit kaempferol glucoside kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content Fruit 1-9 scale uniform ripening Visual rating of fruit yield Rating of yield on a scale Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavanol content Visual rating of fruit appearance Rating of fruit appearance Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Amount of bloom Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Plant Number of days to 50% re-bloom Plant 50% re-bloom 50% re-bloom SWD adult mortality percent Fruit SWD adult mortality Fruit SWD adult mortality days Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). chlorogenic acid Fruit chlorogenic acid Fruit Chlorogenic acid content Retention of fruit firmness while on bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Visual rating of UV damage on fruit Amount of UV damage Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January Leaf to bloom ratio Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin galactoside content Fruit SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate SWD reproductive rate Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Visual observation of exobasidium spot bush size Plant bush size Plant Size of bush in January Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Cyanidin arabinoside content Fruit SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index SWD resistance index Observed color of blooms Color of flowers recorded using available list BLSHV symptoms development time Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant Plant BLSHV symptoms development time Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Fruit Fruit petunidin arabinoside content petunidin arabinoside content Petunidin arabinoside content Plant 50% ripe Number of days to 50% ripe Plant 50% ripe Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Number of upright berries Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 Visual rating of plant vigor Ferulic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Yield per acre as measured Measurement of yield per acre Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Glucose content glucose content Fruit Fruit glucose content Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper leafhoper Leaf Leaf leafhoper grams Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 Visual rating of cluster tightness Visual observation of stem canker Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Blueberry Shock Virus presence Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Phenolic acid content splitting after wetting Fruit splitting after wetting Fruit Percent of fruit that split after setting in water Stem scale insects Stem scale insects Susceptibility to scale insects Fruit anthracnose rot anthracnose rot Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot Fruit Fruit late green Timing of late green fruit Fruit late green Bud size Bud Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size size brix 0-10 index Fruit ferulic acid Ferulic acid content Fruit ferulic acid mm total sugar content Fruit total sugar content Total sugar content Fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Plant growth and yield due to soil A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Malvidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Stem gall wasp Stem Susceptibility to stem gall wasp gall wasp Stem lesion size lesion size Stem Fungal lesion size Percent soluble solids Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer Fruit cyanidin glucoside Fruit cyanidin glucoside Cyanidin glucoside content Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus Plant ring blotch ring blotch Plant variable_of g/100 mL 1-9 scale plant vigor Root nematodes Root nematodes Susceptibility to nematodes Measurement of plant width in centimeters Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content quercetin galactoside content Fruit Fruit quercetin galactoside content Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number Measurement of pollen germination rate Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Visual rating of cluster tightness Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. 0-9 scale fruit flavor Peonidin galactoside content Fruit Fruit peonidin galactoside peonidin galactoside Fruit procyanidin-B1 content procyanidin-B1 content Procyanidin-B1 content Fruit Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit Fruit blue/ripe Fruit blue/ripe Survey of fruit texture on a scale Rating of mature fruit texture Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Amount of UV damage on fruit Fruit UV damage Fruit UV damage Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Catechin content Average weight of 30 fruits Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Percent of fruit rot Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured g/L Plant BLSHV presence Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest BLSHV presence Plant Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set Plant blight-canker Plant blight-canker Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit growth habit Plant growth habit Plant Plant full bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) full bloom Plant Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit 1-9 scale fruit appearance Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening Fruit green fruit drop Fruit green fruit drop ease of release Fruit Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant Fruit ease of release Brix reading from fruit sample Measured from juice from a berry sample pH Leaf bacterial scorch Leaf Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch bacterial scorch Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Visual observation of disease presence 1-9 scale fruit ease of release Fruit diameter Fruit diameter Average diameter of fruit A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding 1-9 scale fruit UV damange Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale flavor, 1-9 scale Fruit Rating of the fruit flavor Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin arabinoside content Visual rating of overall fruit size Rating of fruit size aphids Susceptibility to aphids Plant aphids Plant Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. Percent fruit set Percent of fruit set on the plant measured Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Fruit SWD oviposition success index count Fruit SWD oviposition success index count SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale flower color Flower Flower color Color of flowers Malvidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit phenolic acid Phenolic acid content Fruit phenolic acid Plant width measured in centimeters Plant Plant width width white grubs Root white grubs Root Susceptibility to white grubs Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus Plant Plant scorch virus scorch virus Retention of fruit flavor while on bush Fruit flavor-bush flavor-bush Fruit Fruit Fruit uniform ripening Uniform ripening uniform ripening Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit flavor Fruit flavor D-glucose content D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Visual observation of nematodes 1-9 scale fruit decay Rating of calyx presence Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Rating of fruit firmness Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Fruit petunidin glucoside content Fruit Petunidin glucoside content petunidin glucoside content Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency mineral soil adaptation index Plant mineral soil adaptation index Plant Fruit Citric acid content citric acid content Fruit citric acid content Malic acid content Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Timing of early green fruit early green Fruit early green Fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer height x width measurement cm2 soluble solids Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids Fruit Fruit soluble solids Stem Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight Stem phomopsis blight phomopsis blight Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. Average diameter of 30 fruits Visual observation of blueberry stunt Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt 1-9 scale fruit size 1-3 scale Fruit total phenolics content Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer total phenolics content Fruit Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January leaf to bloom ratio Plant leaf to bloom ratio Plant Observed color of leaves in autumn Color of leaves during autumn weather Fruit Fruit size Fruit size rated on a scale size growth index Stem Stem canker Susceptibility to stem canker canker Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Percent of dead buds from frost damage Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Susceptibility to stem borers Stem Stem borers borers 1-9 scale fruit crispness Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Reaction to leaf rust Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched Durability of bloom 1-9 scale leaf density rust resistance Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation Leaf rust resistance Leaf 1-10 scale winter hardiness 0-1 color scale Bud Measurement of damage from winter weather Bud winter hardiness winter hardiness Plant upright flowers Plant Numer of upright flowers upright flowers 0-3 scale Plant stinkbug Plant Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug stinkbug Fruit weight Average weight of fruit weight Fruit buds/cane Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin galactoside content 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing storage decay Fruit storage decay Amount of fruit decay after storage Fruit Fruit color after wax removal Fruit color - wax removed color - wax removed Fruit D-glucose content Fruit Fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype Measurement of yield per plant 1-9 scale growth habit upright berries Numer of upright berries Plant upright berries Plant Titratable acidity of juice Juice titratable acidity Fruit Fruit Juice titratable acidity Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Average number of seeds per fruit Number of seeds per fruit Sucrose content Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. pH of fruit juice Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin galactoside content yield Plant yield Plant yield Plant Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Fruit rot presence or absence Procyanidin-B2 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of thrips Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Quercetin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit rot Fruit rot Percent of fruit rot Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis Plant Plant leafhopper resistance leafhopper resistance Total sugar content measured in Brix Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index cranberry worm Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm Fruit cranberry worm Fruit Days to 95% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) total acid content Fruit Fruit total acid content Total acid content Fruit bloom durability The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit bloom durability Fruit malvidin galactoside content Malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content Plant Number of buds per cane bud set Plant bud set 1-5 bud size scale Days to 50% bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Fruit Flavanol content flavanol content Fruit flavanol content myricetin glucoside Fruit myricetin glucoside Myricetin 3-glucoside content Fruit kg Pollen germination rate germination rate Pollen germination rate Pollen N Measurement of plant height Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January Effectiveness of self-pollination Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant DNA ratio Plant DNA ratio Plant cherry worm Fruit Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm Fruit cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Visual observation of scale insects Stem Stem monopodial monopodial Monopodial growth habit Plant height height Plant height measured in centimeters Plant Average weight of 25 fruits Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus BLSHV sensitivity Plant BLSHV sensitivity Plant Fruit pH Fruit pH of juice from fruit pH 1-3 scale plant vigor Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. Fruit Fruit fructose content Fructose content fructose content Percent of flowers which have died due to disease Percent of dead flowers Fructose content Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Plant first ripe Plant first ripe Average time needed to penetrate fruits Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Measurement of bud set Fruit seed count seed count Fruit Average seed count per fruit Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Days to 5% ripe Fruit sucrose content sucrose content Fruit Sucrose content Visual observation of aphids Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Development time in years Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe 1-9 scale fruit firmness Characteristic of fruit when bite into Rating of fruit crispness/texture Number of days to 50% bloom Plant 50% bloom Plant 50% bloom Amount of winter damage on scale Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. mg/mL Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage 1-9 scale fruit texture Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content Syringetin 3-glucoside content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. Percent of rotted fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Delphinidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight ms Timing of shoot expansion Shoot expansion Shoot expansion 1-9 scale fruit flavor 1-9 scale fruit picking scar Percent of fruit with rot Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight 1-9 scale fruit yield DNA/stdDNA scale_of g/mm Brix reading from 20 fruit Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Plant true to type Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers true to type Plant Cyanidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Plant Plant exobasidium spot Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot exobasidium spot 1-3 scale pollen germination rate Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot procyanidin-B2 content Procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Fruit Flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Petunidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Kaempferol glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits Fruit cluster tightness cluster tightness density Density of leaves in plant canopy Leaf Leaf density 1-3 scale cluster tightness Number of berries per cup Fruit number per cup Fruit number per cup temperature in celsius Flower petal fall Flower Timing of petal fall petal fall 0-10 scale winter damage Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Uniformity of bud size delphinidin glucoside Delphinidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit delphinidin glucoside 1-9 scale cluster tightness Percent of repeat bloom Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. Visual observation of stem borers Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers hours cm Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed height x width measurement cm2 Computation of bush size based on height and width in January Fruit picking scar Fruit picking scar Size rating of picking scar on fruit Plant 5% ripe Plant 5% ripe Number of days to 5% ripe Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Visual observation of stem gall wasp Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Flower Flower blight death Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas blight death Stem winter damage winter damage Stem Measurement of damage from winter weather Petunidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax 1-9 scale Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Percent of fruit that split from water Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Chlorogenic acid content Total acid content Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept 1-5 index Visual observation of algal stem blotch Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch method_of Number of upright flowers Number of upright flowers on the plant measured Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions.