STB STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS FRFRMMEAN Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm 5.0 dark red fruit 2.0 weak, 80% will die 5% rubs off 8.0 3.0 moderately tight GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count FLWRSUPRGT 5.0 60% buds destroyed MINSOIL Ohio State University Blueberry consortium MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index Blueberry consortium CLUSTER2 CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale USDA-ARS-HCRL 6.0 above average dense canopy FAC North Carolina State University-PHHI FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale CALYX USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSC FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium dark red fruit 5.0 75% willowy 3.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL DAC DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium PLGRC PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g FLAVONC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 70% buds destroyed 4.0 7.0 30% having calyx FRSP FRSP_FruitSplit_% Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 GFRD FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRUCC USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale BS SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count GRIN-Vaccinium SWDRR Blueberry consortium ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 Blueberry consortium ANFR USDA-ARS QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g QRC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium MBFR MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research PFRROT_FruitRot_% GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium PFRROT USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRDMG_FrostDamage_% Blueberry consortium FRDMG 15% difficult to remove 7.0 1.0 mush SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium SDN USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL2 Blueberry consortium FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale YIELDACRE_Yield_kg GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium YIELDACRE STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm USDA-ARS-TCHSL STBL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g TAC2 SWDRI SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium 5.0 average density canopy average yield 5.0 USDA-ARS TAC TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium 2.0 between or average USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale WHBUD USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 FRFB 4.0 moderately low yiedld WINM WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium FRFRMB FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 SNL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 8.0 30% buds destroyed BSZ_BushSize_cm2 Blueberry consortium BSZ USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS CFW CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 Blueberry consortium APH Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS APH_SusToAphids_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGLC PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium PC USDA-ARS PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 Blueberry consortium CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale CLUSTER USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium WHWOOD Michigan State University WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale BLODUR USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale 8.0 5% decayed 60% difficult to remove 4.0 dense canopy 8.0 CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L MALAC Blueberry consortium still too tart 3.0 7.0 moderately high yield USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRAP FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale Blueberry consortium PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL PHENAC North Carolina State University-PHHI MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g MGC Blueberry consortium GRH Blueberry consortium GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL 9.0 very firm NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium NFR CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS CRFW extremely loose 9.0 LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Ebrahiem Babiker LBR 6.0 moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) KGC North Carolina State University-PHHI KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium TA Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium PEGAC PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL LC_Color_0-1scale GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium LC SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL SHEXP Jeannie Rowland FLAVANC Blueberry consortium FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CITAC CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L 1.0 killed to the ground 90% difficult to remove 2.0 STGW STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS FRPH_FruitJuice_pH Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRPH FRDIA2 FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRCL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL LFD LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS GLUCC GLUCC_Glucose_g/L Blueberry consortium BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 BLSHVP USDA-ARS-HCRL 6.0 above average vigorous (40% will die) 50% killed to the ground 6.0 2.0 90% killed to the ground 50B_50%Bloom_day USDA-ARS-HCRL 50B Blueberry consortium FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale Jeannie Rowland FRF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g PAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RP Blueberry consortium 50RP_50%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-TCHSL PLWTH USDA-ARS-HCRL PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium BRF_75%Ripe_date BRF BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 Blueberry consortium BLST USDA-ARS SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix SS3 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g CAC HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium HVSP too firm 9.0 short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) 8.0 TTT USDA-ARS-HCRL TTT_CultivarID_0/1 Blueberry consortium DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGLUCC mostly mush 2.0 TA2 USDA-ARS-HCRL TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium moderatly firm 6.0 Blueberry consortium MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g MGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium LGF_LateGreenFruit_date LGF Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 PRR USDA-ARS-TCHSL TADA TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL Blueberry consortium BLOOM USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale PLHGT PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FIB FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL moderately loose canopy 2.0 Blueberry consortium CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGLC 30% heterogeneous sizes 6.0 SSP_SolubleSolids_% GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SSP VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium VIG2 CC CC_Catechin_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium FRCR Blueberry consortium FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL 5RP_5%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-GIFVL 5RP Blueberry consortium 6.0 moderatly firm 8.0 5% willowy 7.0 15% willowy USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FLBL FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% FSP GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FSP_FruitSet_% medium-loose 2.0 awful 1.0 5.0 45% difficult to remove 2.0 80% having calyx Blueberry consortium SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count SWDVEPF GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium YLDW USDA-ARS-TCHSL YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg 8.0 5% heterogeneous sizes 95RP USDA-ARS-HCRL 95RP_95%Ripe_day Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS NEM NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 SWD USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index 7.0 short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL FWT YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL YLD Blueberry consortium STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 STCA USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDOSIS SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 20% uniformly sized buds 4.0 CYGAC CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FT USDA-ARS-HCRL FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale Blueberry consortium 9.0 very dense canopy Blueberry consortium PGAC PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms USDA-ARS-TCHSL Ebrahiem Babiker PENTMEAN DGLC DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale BUDSZ Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium 30% rubs off 6.0 DNARATIO DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 BBC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS NRBV NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium LHR LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index SS2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS2_TotSugar_brix Blueberry consortium long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 2.0 1.0 lots of damage FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale FRF2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 9.0 overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking FC_Color_0-9scale FC Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L TOTAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL semi soft 4.0 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 2.0 USDA-ARS FLTH Blueberry consortium FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 5.0 45% rubs off Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL PF PF_PetalFall_date USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRP FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 4.0 light red fruit 6.0 WGR WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS weak, most will die 1.0 FRSZ2 Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count loose 3.0 7.0 dark blue fruits North Carolina State University-PHHI PB2C Blueberry consortium PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g 30% damage 6.0 ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit 1.0 GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium REPEATBLM REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% all buds destroyed on bush 1.0 BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium BLSHV USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRFRM FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale Jeannie Rowland 9.0 excellent USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius COLDTL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS ALFR ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 worst, heterogenous sizes 1.0 Blueberry consortium QAC QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI 5.0 half having calyx (50%) 1.0 black fruit PB1C North Carolina State University-PHHI PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g Blueberry consortium 4.0 60% having calyx CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour CR USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium BLS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 GALL USDA-ARS-HCRL GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g MGAC 50RB Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RB_50%ReBloom_day SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDOSIC SWDLPF SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MAC VIG3 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g PGLC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PEAC PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g DGAC 2.0 90% heterogeneous sizes Blueberry consortium TA3 USDA-ARS-TCHSL TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL semi firm 5.0 4.0 60% heterogeneous sizes BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BLSV Blueberry consortium FRSZ FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS-HCRL MONO MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 Blueberry consortium semi mush 4.0 9.0 best, homogeneous USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium SELF SELF_SelfFertility_% FWT2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g weak 1.0 BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 BDMT Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 9.0 Blueberry consortium BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane BS2 USDA-ARS-HCRL moderately loose 7.0 CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CHAC 6.0 slightly tart but good sweetness all decayed 1.0 30% difficult to remove 6.0 semi mush 4.0 BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium BLSHVE USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% POLR 20% killed to the ground 9.0 FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRUV USDA-ARS-HCRL SCALE SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 3.0 75% difficult to remove 5.0 maximum resistance (>80% resistant) GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count BERRUPRGT 1.0 dense 15% rubs off 7.0 SUCC Blueberry consortium SUCC_Sucrose_g/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL VIG Blueberry consortium VIG_Vigor_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL 2.0 90% willowy USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale FREASE USDA-ARS-HCRL FRD FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale Blueberry consortium rubs off easily 1.0 Blueberry ontology Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS ASTB ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 5.0 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 60% damage 4.0 7.0 dark blue fruits 4.0 high resistance (75% resistant) 80% buds destroyed 3.0 AGC Blueberry consortium AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BLMAG BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm FRDIA Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL light purple fruit 4.0 all calyx 1.0 TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L Blueberry consortium TPC USDA-ARS-TCHSL 9.0 small, dry 8.0 light blue fruits 3.0 moderately soft 5.0 semi firm SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix SS5 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium POLGR POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium 3.0 vigorous mush 1.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS PHTB PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 aluminum blue fruits 9.0 30% killed to the ground 8.0 FUB_FullBloom_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium FUB 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet 7.0 1.0 less dense canopy 60% willowy 4.0 MBBL Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% 2.0 very low yield 4.0 slight too tart but acceptable 8.0 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet 9.0 stocky 1.0 uniformly sized buds 50% uniformly sized buds 3.0 60% will die 4.0 2.0 mostly mush entity ELFS ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS FRFRM2 FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL 8.0 crunch 4.0 60% decayed 5.0 45% willowy very tight 1.0 mostly firm 7.0 3.0 dark purple fruit mostly soft 2.0 ECC Blueberry consortium ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI 6.0 40% having calyx 6.0 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet 70% having calyx 3.0 light red fruit 6.0 nice pop, optimal firmness 8.0 very vigorous (highest survival) 9.0 semi-loose 4.0 GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% SWDAMP 2-3 buds/cane 2.0 moderately vigoroug (30% will die) 7.0 80% uniformly sized buds 2.0 LRR Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale 3.0 75% heterogeneous sizes Lowest 1.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium QGC 1.0 minimal resistance (15% resistant) 9.0 no damage 7.0 15% heterogeneous sizes 5% difficult to remove 8.0 Blueberry consortium FRROT Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% 9.0 attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact 7.0 40% buds destroyed 3.0 weak, 70% will die light blue fruits 8.0 6.0 30% decayed 10.0 no damage attribute 6.0 above average yield 6.0 moderatly firm 3.0 75% damage light purple fruit 4.0 moderate resistance (45% resistant) 3.0 mostly firm 7.0 2.0 90% rubs off semi-loose canopy 3.0 4+ buds/cane 3.0 EGF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date 5.0 loose (type 5) 2.0 light black fruit 1.0 willowy balanced tartness and sweetness 5.0 stays on 9.0 semi firm 5.0 Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix SS nice pop, optimal firmness 8.0 8.0 sweetness overpowering 3.0 75% rubs off dark purple fruit 3.0 3.0 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits very tart but sweetness 2.0 no damage 10.0 too firm 9.0 9.0 no calyx Medium 2.0 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) 1.0 BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 BMS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 3.0 average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 5.0 7.0 15% damage no yield 1.0 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 6.0 acronym 75% decayed 3.0 very soft 1.0 1.0 black fruit light black fruit 2.0 50% buds destroyed 6.0 8.0 vigorous (20% will die) 5.0 45% decayed 30% willowy 6.0 slightly tart but sweetness overpowering 7.0 low yield 3.0 8.0 high yield, optimal mostly firm 7.0 9.0 20% buds destroyed 1 bud/cane 1.0 4.0 60% rubs off 6.0 loose (type 6) 5.0 average vigorous, 50% will die 5.0 45% heterogeneous sizes 4.0 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 9.0 no decay 5.0 substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 3.0 Highest 5.0 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 45% damage 5.0 2.0 90% decayed 90% damage 2.0 80% killed to the ground 3.0 8.0 20% having calyx 4.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 2.0 90% buds destroyed aluminum blue fruits 9.0 3.0 moderately mush 7.0 40% killed to the ground 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 7.0 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet 2.0 loose canopy 4.0 mostly loose 8.0 1.0 difficult to remove 5.0 60% killed to the ground light resistance (30% resistant) 2.0 mostly tight 2.0 7.0 moderately dense canopy 70% killed to the ground 4.0 7.0 15% decayed 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 8.0 8.0 5% damage moderately mush 3.0 1.0 large, deep, torn skin, wet very easy to remove 9.0 Rating of yield on a scale Visual rating of fruit yield Amount of bloom Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Procyanidin-B2 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight scale_of Visual observation of nematodes Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe Days to 95% ripe Percent of shoots with blight Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight bacterial scorch Leaf Leaf bacterial scorch Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch yield Plant Plant yield Plant yield Susceptibility to gall midge Bud gall midge Bud gall midge 0-3 scale Fruit Fruit kaempferol glucoside kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content Plant Plant stunt Susceptibility to blueberry stunt stunt Total anthocyanin in fruit Fruit total anthocyanin content total anthocyanin content Fruit calyx on/off Fruit Presence of calyx at time of harvest Fruit calyx on/off Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set height x width measurement cm2 Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer cranberry worm Fruit Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm Fruit cranberry worm days petunidin arabinoside content Fruit petunidin arabinoside content Petunidin arabinoside content Fruit Stem winter damage Stem winter damage Measurement of damage from winter weather Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding Plant Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus Plant ring blotch ring blotch phytophthora rot Root Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot Root phytophthora rot bud set Plant Number of buds per cane Plant bud set buds/cane Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Plant first ripe Plant first ripe D-glucose content Fruit D-glucose content Fruit D-glucose content Stem scale insects Susceptibility to scale insects Stem scale insects Fruit petunidin glucoside content Fruit Petunidin glucoside content petunidin glucoside content 0-9 scale fruit flavor Characteristic of fruit when bite into Rating of fruit crispness/texture Fruit penetration time penetration time Time elapsed for pentration Fruit Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. pH of fruit juice Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers Visual observation of stem borers Visual rating of cluster tightness Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Leaf Color of leaves in fall color Leaf color Fruit plum curculio Fruit plum curculio Susceptibility to plum curculio Rating of calyx presence Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Percent of fruit rot Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured Percent of repeat bloom Plant vigor vigor Plant vigor Plant mm Fruit color after wax removal Fruit color - wax removed Fruit color - wax removed Citric acid content Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Brix reading from 20 fruit nematodes Root Root nematodes Susceptibility to nematodes Fruit uniform ripening Uniform ripening Fruit uniform ripening Visual rating of UV damage on fruit Amount of UV damage Fruit Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids Fruit soluble solids soluble solids Plant Plant blight-canker Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker blight-canker Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits Fruit cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Days to 50% ripe Bud Bud cold damage The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) cold damage Fruit ferulic acid Ferulic acid content Fruit ferulic acid Percent of fruit set on the plant measured Percent fruit set UV damage Fruit Amount of UV damage on fruit Fruit UV damage Bud Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds Bud frost damage frost damage SWD oviposition success index scale Fruit SWD resistance, oviposition success index count Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale mg/L Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Plant growth habit growth habit Plant Total phenolics content Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions mg/100 g Visual observation of aphids Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids 0/1 Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed grams Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Measurement of bud set Retention of fruit firmness while on bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Caffeic acid content Fruit caffeic acid Fruit caffeic acid 1-9 scale fruit size Percent of dead flowers Percent of flowers which have died due to disease Fruit crispness Texture of fruit Fruit crispness percent Titratable acidity of juice Fruit Juice titratable acidity Juice titratable acidity Fruit 1-9 scale cluster tightness 1-3 scale pollen germination rate Visual observation of white grubs Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Number of upright flowers on the plant measured Number of upright flowers Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. Amount of fruit decay after storage Fruit storage decay storage decay Fruit Fruit Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Cyanidin arabinoside content cyanidin arabinoside flavor Fruit flavor Fruit Rating of the fruit flavor Effectiveness of self-pollination Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Plant DNA ratio Plant DNA ratio Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant cm One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count Fruit total acid content total acid content Fruit Total acid content variable_of Plant repeat bloom Plant Percent repeat bloom repeat bloom Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Blueberry Shock Virus presence Bud Bud chilling requirement Chill units for 50% budbreak chilling requirement g/100 mL mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Plant aphids aphids Susceptibility to aphids Plant Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Uniformity of bud size Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility mummy berry rot susceptibility Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot Fruit Rating of mature fruit texture Survey of fruit texture on a scale Visual observation of stem gall wasp Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Fruit Fruit appearance Attractiveness of fruit appearance appearance Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Total sugar content measured in Brix Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker Visual observation of stem canker Fruit Phenolic acid content Fruit phenolic acid phenolic acid Cyanidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight seed count Fruit Fruit seed count Average seed count per fruit 50% bloom Number of days to 50% bloom Plant Plant 50% bloom Cyanidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight method_of malvidin arabinoside content Malvidin arabinoside content Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Fruit flavanol content Fruit Flavanol content Fruit flavanol content bloom durability Fruit bloom durability Fruit The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Plant Plant mineral soil adaptation index mineral soil adaptation index Fruit Fruit pH pH of juice from fruit pH Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index Flower Flower blight death blight death Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas Bud Bud winter hardiness winter hardiness Measurement of damage from winter weather Chill unit measurement Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Visual observation of insect presence Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit Percent fruit set Plant fruit set Plant fruit set g/L Rating of picking scar Visual rating of picking scar on fruit Fruit Fruit SWD oviposition success index count SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index count Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Amount of winter damage on stem number per cup Fruit number per cup Number of berries per cup Fruit Fruit Myricetin 3-glucoside content Fruit myricetin glucoside myricetin glucoside Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin galactoside content Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot anthracnose rot Fruit Fruit anthracnose rot BLSHV presence Plant Plant BLSHV presence Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest Fruit peonidin arabinoside peonidin arabinoside Peonidin arabinoside content Fruit Days to 50% re-bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom Fruit Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Rating of the fruit flavor flavor, 1-9 scale Fruit Fruit maggot maggot Susceptibility to blueberry maggot Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Leaf density Density of leaves in plant canopy Leaf density Plant Plant leaf to bloom ratio Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January leaf to bloom ratio Fruit quercetin galactoside content Fruit quercetin galactoside content Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content Chlorogenic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Fruit green fruit drop green fruit drop Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin galactoside content Fruit quercetin arabinoside content Fruit Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content quercetin arabinoside content Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin galactoside content Caffeic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content petunidin galactoside content Numer of upright berries Plant upright berries upright berries Plant 1-5 bud size scale Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite sucrose content Fruit Sucrose content Fruit sucrose content Measurement of yield per plant Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype 1-5 index Fruit bloom amount bloom amount Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin rutinoside content late green Timing of late green fruit Fruit Fruit late green Visual rating of fruit appearance Rating of fruit appearance Fruit SWD reproductive rate SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Procyanidin-B2 content Fruit picking scar Size rating of picking scar on fruit Fruit picking scar Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Fruit splitting after wetting splitting after wetting Fruit Percent of fruit that split after setting in water exobasidium spot Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Plant exobasidium spot Plant Size of bush in January bush size Plant bush size Plant Bud mite Bud mite Susceptibility to bud mite Color of flowers recorded using available list Observed color of blooms Plant Plant 50% re-bloom 50% re-bloom Number of days to 50% re-bloom upright flowers Plant Numer of upright flowers Plant upright flowers Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. Percent of rotted fruit 0-10 scale winter damage Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance Fruit cyanidin glucoside cyanidin glucoside Fruit Cyanidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit flavor-bush flavor-bush Retention of fruit flavor while on bush Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Percent of dead buds from frost damage SWD adult mortality percent Fruit SWD adult mortality Fruit SWD adult mortality Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Procyanidin-B1 content Ferulic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Development time in years Petunidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight ms Fruit Fruit malic acid content malic acid content Malic acid content SWD antibiosis Fruit SWD antibiosis SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit Fruit Flavonol content Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. ease of release Fruit Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant Fruit ease of release Fruit average fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer average fruit firmness, measured Fruit Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot 1-3 scale plant vigor mg/mL Average weight of fruit Fruit Fruit weight weight Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Average time needed to penetrate fruits Monopodial growth habit monopodial Stem Stem monopodial Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Percent of fruit that split from water Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched Durability of bloom 1-9 scale fruit UV damange Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus scorch virus Plant scorch virus Plant 1-9 scale uniform ripening pH 1-9 scale fruit picking scar Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Days to 50% bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Glucose content Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavanol content Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Rating of plant growth habit Visual rating of plant growth habit Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Fructose content Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Susceptibility to stem gall wasp Stem Stem gall wasp gall wasp Susceptibility to stem borers Stem borers borers Stem Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Epi-catechin content Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Number of upright berries Fruit blue/ripe Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit Fruit blue/ripe 1-9 scale growth habit Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Visual observation of disease presence Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Visual observation of exobasidium spot kg Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Plant Plant first bloom first bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Malic acid content Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measured from juice from a berry sample Brix reading from fruit sample syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content Syringetin 3-glucoside content pollination rate Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations Flower pollination rate Flower Amount of winter damage on scale Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Texture of mature fruit Fruit texture texture Fruit 1-9 scale fruit ease of release Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Kaempferol glucoside content Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Malvidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Leaf rust resistance Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation rust resistance Leaf Susceptibility to flower thrips thrips Flower Flower thrips Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Days to 5% ripe Chlorogenic acid content Fruit chlorogenic acid Fruit chlorogenic acid Flavonol content flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Fruit g/mm Plant Plant true to type Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers true to type Peonidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Average weight of 25 fruits Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis Plant leafhopper resistance Plant leafhopper resistance 1-3 scale lesion size Stem lesion size Fungal lesion size Stem Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Plant BLSHV symptoms development time Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant BLSHV symptoms development time cm2 0-9 color scale rot Percent of fruit rot Fruit rot Fruit date Bud winter moth Bud winter moth Susceptibility to winter moth 0-10 index Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 Count of numer of berries per cup Count of number of berries per cup Total acid content Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Computation of bush size based on height and width in January height x width measurement cm2 Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Fruit rot presence or absence Measurement of plant width in centimeters Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January Visual observation of algal stem blotch Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Plant full bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) full bloom Plant total phenolics content Fruit Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer Fruit total phenolics content count Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content Fruit Malvidin galactoside content Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Visual observation of phytophthora root rot Fruit Fruit delphinidin glucoside delphinidin glucoside Delphinidin glucoside content Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot alternaria rot Fruit Fruit alternaria rot 1-10 scale winter hardiness Delphinidin arabinoside content Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January Measurement of plant height Average diameter of 20 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample Sucrose content Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. growth index Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer Percent soluble solids Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin galactoside content Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe Visual observation of blueberry stunt Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt Susceptibility to stem canker Stem canker Stem canker One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale 1-9 scale fruit firmness Measurement of pollen germination rate Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). Rating of fruit firmness Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Visual observation of scale insects Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Stem phomopsis blight Stem Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight phomopsis blight Peonidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-9 scale plant vigor Fruit early green Timing of early green fruit Fruit early green Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. Average diameter of 30 fruits Percent of dead buds due to winter damage Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. 1-9 scale fruit texture 1-9 scale fruit appearance hours Myricetin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-9 scale leaf density Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Epi-catechin content Fruit Fruit epi-catechin epi-catechin Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Fruit malvidin glucoside content Fruit malvidin glucoside content Malvidin glucoside content Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. Stem lesion size Catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Flower Flower self-fertility self-fertility Self-fertility of cultivar Fruit peonidin galactoside Fruit peonidin galactoside Peonidin galactoside content Total sugar content Fruit total sugar content Fruit total sugar content Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Visual observation of plum curculio Fruit cherry worm Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm Fruit cherry worm DNA/stdDNA 1-9 scale fruit flavor Firmness of fruit measurement Fruit Fruit firmness, measured firmness, measured 1-9 scale Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin galactoside content delphinidin galactoside Fruit delphinidin galactoside Fruit Delphinidin galactoside content Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January Leaf to bloom ratio germination rate Pollen Pollen germination rate Pollen germination rate 1-9 scale calyx Cyanidin galactoside content Fruit cyanidin galactoside cyanidin galactoside Fruit 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight 1-9 scale fruit crispness 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B1 content Plant 5% ripe Plant Number of days to 5% ripe 5% ripe Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin arabinoside content Fruit fructose content Fructose content fructose content Fruit mummy berry blight susceptibility Shoot Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight catechin Catechin content Fruit Fruit catechin Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Glucose content glucose content Fruit glucose content Fruit Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Plant 95% ripe 95% ripe Plant Number of days to 95% ripe Malvidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Bud size Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size size Bud Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Visual observation of thrips Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Measurement of plant growth upright Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Stem Susceptibility to algal stem blotch algal blotch Stem algal blotch Number of seeds per fruit Average number of seeds per fruit N Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper Leaf leafhoper leafhoper Leaf brix order of leaf and bloom emergence Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Visual rating of fruit decay Rating of fruit decay after storage Flower color Flower flower color Color of flowers mg/100 g of fresh weight Fruit SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index SWD resistance index Plant fruit number Plant Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations fruit number Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 Visual rating of cluster tightness Plant BLSHV sensitivity Plant ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus BLSHV sensitivity Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit Color of fruit Visual survey of fruit color Fruit citric acid content Citric acid content Fruit citric acid content 0-1 color scale temperature in celsius A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Plant growth and yield due to soil Phenolic acid content Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Plant stinkbug Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug Plant stinkbug Flower Flower petal fall Timing of petal fall petal fall Root white grubs white grubs Root Susceptibility to white grubs 0-5Index Plant height height Plant Plant height measured in centimeters Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper Shoot expansion expansion Shoot Timing of shoot expansion 1-9 scale fruit color Fruit Average diameter of fruit Fruit diameter diameter Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Average weight of 30 fruits Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin galactoside content Measurement of yield per acre Yield per acre as measured Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Visual rating of overall fruit size Rating of fruit size Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content quercetin rutinoside content Fruit Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit color Fruit color D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. D-glucose content Color of leaves during autumn weather Observed color of leaves in autumn size Fruit Fruit size rated on a scale Fruit size 1-9 scale fruit decay Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Percent of fruit with rot 1-9 scale fruit yield firmness, scale Fruit firmness, scale Firmness of fruit estimation Fruit Fruit peonidin glucoside Peonidin glucoside content Fruit peonidin glucoside 50% ripe Number of days to 50% ripe Plant Plant 50% ripe Plant width measured in centimeters Plant width width Plant 1-3 scale cluster tightness Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Reaction to leaf rust