60% decayed 4.0 very firm 9.0 3.0 80% killed to the ground FWT FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 STCA Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RB 50RB_50%ReBloom_day WHWOOD WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale Michigan State University Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL TADA TAC2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g CR CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL 9.0 very dense canopy Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL LGF LGF_LateGreenFruit_date 1.0 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) loose canopy 4.0 7.0 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits REPEATBLM REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SSP Blueberry consortium SSP_SolubleSolids_% GRIN-Vaccinium 3.0 4+ buds/cane BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 Blueberry consortium BMS USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g PGLC 3.0 vigorous STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL STBL Blueberry consortium BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL BLSHVP SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix SS5 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index Blueberry consortium Ohio State University MINSOIL 8.0 light blue fruits Blueberry consortium TTT_CultivarID_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL TTT 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 8.0 3.0 low yield Blueberry consortium GFRD GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL 60% will die 4.0 BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BLSV 3.0 moderate resistance (45% resistant) 2.0 light black fruit weak, most will die 1.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Ebrahiem Babiker PENTMEAN PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms 9.0 no calyx no decay 9.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRD FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale Blueberry consortium CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL CITAC GRIN-Vaccinium SWDAMP SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% Blueberry consortium 30% killed to the ground 8.0 LC_Color_0-1scale LC GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium EGF EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL 6.0 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits average yield 5.0 Blueberry consortium FLBL FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% USDA-ARS-HCRL 4.0 60% difficult to remove Blueberry consortium BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale BUDSZ Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium PB1C PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g ECC North Carolina State University-PHHI ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L MALAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FT FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL PAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g aluminum blue fruits 9.0 CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale CLUSTER USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g FAC light black fruit 2.0 mostly firm 7.0 ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit 1.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date FIB SWDRR GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGLC Blueberry consortium FRCL USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale 7.0 15% heterogeneous sizes North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium MGC MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRAP FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale slightly tart but good sweetness 6.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL GRH Blueberry consortium GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale 5% heterogeneous sizes 8.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL TA3 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 FRFRMB semi-loose canopy 3.0 5.0 maximum resistance (>80% resistant) 2.0 long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) FREASE Blueberry consortium FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL 90% rubs off 2.0 Blueberry consortium POLGR GRIN-Vaccinium POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale Blueberry consortium BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale GRIN-Vaccinium BLSHVE 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 4.0 MONO USDA-ARS-HCRL MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 SCALE USDA-ARS 4.0 70% buds destroyed USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium CYGAC 80% uniformly sized buds 2.0 extremely loose 9.0 2.0 mostly tight average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 5.0 FRUV FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS ANFR 95RP_95%Ripe_day 95RP Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale LFD Blueberry consortium FC GRIN-Vaccinium FC_Color_0-9scale USDA-ARS-GIFVL 5RP Blueberry consortium 5RP_5%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix Blueberry consortium SS3 USDA-ARS PRR Blueberry consortium PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 3.0 75% rubs off entity FRSP USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRSP_FruitSplit_% Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% MBBL GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FSP_FruitSet_% FSP USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium MAC MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 ALFR USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA GRIN-Vaccinium DNARATIO Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium APH APH_SusToAphids_0/1 USDA-ARS 3.0 75% damage North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g QGC 9.0 20% killed to the ground 60% buds destroyed 5.0 attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact 9.0 45% decayed 5.0 CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g CHAC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 ASTB USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BBC BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRCL2 FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale GLUCC GLUCC_Glucose_g/L USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium 2.0 very low yield 70% killed to the ground 4.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL BSZ_BushSize_cm2 BSZ Blueberry consortium FRF2 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale 60% willowy 4.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale FRFRM 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet 7.0 50B 50B_50%Bloom_day Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count BERRUPRGT GRIN-Vaccinium 6.0 light red fruit SUCC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SUCC_Sucrose_g/L semi firm 5.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVANC FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count FLWRSUPRGT FRDMG_FrostDamage_% FRDMG Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius COLDTL moderatly firm 6.0 8.0 5% willowy FRFB USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 semi mush 4.0 PFRROT GRIN-Vaccinium PFRROT_FruitRot_% Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% NFR Blueberry consortium vigorous (20% will die) 8.0 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 5.0 40% having calyx 6.0 80% buds destroyed 3.0 4.0 semi soft CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium CFW all calyx 1.0 Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% FRROT 5.0 substantial difference between smallest and largest buds Medium 2.0 dark blue fruits 7.0 CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI CAC Blueberry consortium BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane Blueberry consortium BS2 USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS-HCRL BS BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RP 50RP_50%Ripe_day FRP Blueberry consortium FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date USDA-ARS-HCRL BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale Blueberry consortium BLOOM USDA-ARS-GIFVL high resistance (75% resistant) 4.0 DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g DGLC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium WINM WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRDIA FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm 5% damage 8.0 4.0 above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) HVSP Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium QAC FRF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale CC North Carolina State University-PHHI CC_Catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 USDA-ARS ELFS Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium YIELDACRE YIELDACRE_Yield_kg GRIN-Vaccinium USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland PF_PetalFall_date PF average vigorous, 50% will die 5.0 Blueberry consortium MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% MBFR Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research 45% rubs off 5.0 1.0 weak FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count GRIN-Vaccinium FRSZ2 Blueberry consortium 5% rubs off 8.0 SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIC 3.0 weak, 70% will die USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale FRCR Blueberry consortium 1.0 awful 50% buds destroyed 6.0 TOTAC TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium BLS USDA-ARS BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 15% decayed 7.0 75% heterogeneous sizes 3.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL CALYX CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale Blueberry consortium BRF BRF_75%Ripe_date Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL 3.0 dark purple fruit 7.0 15% rubs off Blueberry consortium BLSHV BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year GRIN-Vaccinium stays on 9.0 Blueberry consortium TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g TAC USDA-ARS DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L DGLUCC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 9.0 aluminum blue fruits USDA-ARS-HCRL SELF_SelfFertility_% SELF Blueberry consortium MGAC MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TPC TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g CYAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-HCRL BLODUR BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale Blueberry consortium 90% decayed 2.0 AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium AGC USDA-ARS-HCRL PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm PLWTH Blueberry consortium LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index North Carolina State University-PHHI LHR Blueberry consortium LRR Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale semi mush 4.0 8.0 5% decayed too firm 9.0 5.0 60% killed to the ground FUB_FullBloom_date FUB USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g PEAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL mostly firm 7.0 40% killed to the ground 7.0 DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g DAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 30% decayed 6.0 60% heterogeneous sizes 4.0 1.0 very soft 30% difficult to remove 6.0 Blueberry consortium NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 NEM USDA-ARS all buds destroyed on bush 1.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL TA2 TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL 15% damage 7.0 90% difficult to remove 2.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Ebrahiem Babiker FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm FRFRMMEAN SS2_TotSugar_brix Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS2 SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SWD Blueberry consortium SS SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research 6.0 loose (type 6) all decayed 1.0 2.0 90% willowy SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index Blueberry consortium SWDRI GRIN-Vaccinium Highest 3.0 STGW USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 20% uniformly sized buds 4.0 PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS PC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL VIG VIG_Vigor_1-9scale Ebrahiem Babiker LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale USDA-ARS-HCRL LBR Blueberry consortium TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL TA Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGLC MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g PHENAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness PGAC PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium WHBUD WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 9.0 very easy to remove 1.0 willowy 8.0 short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) CLUSTER2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale moderately loose canopy 2.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSZ Blueberry consortium FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale Blueberry consortium WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 USDA-ARS WGR USDA-ARS-HCRL YLD YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale Blueberry consortium 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 light purple fruit 4.0 2.0 80% having calyx 9.0 best, homogeneous 3.0 moderately mush 90% buds destroyed 2.0 PEGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS STB STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g QRC 7.0 moderately vigoroug (30% will die) 9.0 20% buds destroyed 30% buds destroyed 8.0 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 5.0 1.0 killed to the ground FLAVONC FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium uniformly sized buds 1.0 FRDIA2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Ebrahiem Babiker FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm 5% difficult to remove 8.0 7.0 dark blue fruits KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g KGC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 Blueberry consortium BLMAG 7.0 moderately high yield Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRUCC FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g 5.0 45% willowy no damage 10.0 3.0 moderately soft dark red fruit 5.0 3.0 75% willowy Blueberry consortium PLGRC GRIN-Vaccinium PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm 7.0 slightly tart but sweetness overpowering Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g FWT2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGLC PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 FLTH 1.0 worst, heterogenous sizes 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness half having calyx (50%) 5.0 SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL SHEXP Jeannie Rowland 2.0 mostly mush 5.0 average density canopy USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BLST BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 3.0 70% having calyx 1.0 very tight mostly mush 2.0 moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) 6.0 dense 1.0 mush 1.0 above average dense canopy 6.0 3.0 moderately tight Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BDMT BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIS Blueberry consortium DGAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSC FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale Blueberry consortium 8.0 mostly loose lots of damage 1.0 10.0 no damage 9.0 overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking loose (type 5) 5.0 SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium SNL still too tart 3.0 POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% POLR Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL stocky 9.0 4.0 60% having calyx moderately dense canopy 7.0 SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDLPF GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 GALL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 8.0 high yield, optimal CRFW CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS SWDVEPF Blueberry consortium SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count GRIN-Vaccinium 4.0 slight too tart but acceptable Jeannie Rowland FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N FRFRM2 USDA-ARS-GIFVL USDA-ARS PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 PHTB Blueberry consortium 7.0 short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) mostly soft 2.0 YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg YLDW Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 9.0 no damage 1.0 Lowest 60% damage 4.0 black fruit 1.0 Blueberry consortium SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count USDA-ARS-HCRL SDN 6.0 30% damage acronym 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 2.0 very tart but sweetness 2.0 45% damage 5.0 8.0 dense canopy 50% uniformly sized buds 3.0 light resistance (30% resistant) 2.0 mostly firm 7.0 8.0 20% having calyx 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet 8.0 5.0 semi firm PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm PLHGT USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 5.0 45% difficult to remove 8.0 light blue fruits short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 9.0 3.0 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRPH FRPH_FruitJuice_pH Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 VIG3 9.0 small, dry 3.0 dark purple fruit 3.0 75% difficult to remove above average yield 6.0 balanced tartness and sweetness 5.0 50% killed to the ground 6.0 4.0 light purple fruit 15% willowy 7.0 sweetness overpowering 8.0 crunch 8.0 3.0 moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 7.0 moderately loose 1.0 less dense canopy light red fruit 6.0 60% rubs off 4.0 rubs off easily 1.0 7.0 30% having calyx 1.0 mush North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g PB2C 6.0 above average vigorous (40% will die) 2-3 buds/cane 2.0 4.0 semi-loose 2.0 90% damage 15% difficult to remove 7.0 USDA-ARS NRBV Blueberry consortium NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 90% heterogeneous sizes 2.0 moderatly firm 6.0 3.0 moderately mush 6.0 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 1.0 no yield large, deep, torn skin, wet 1.0 medium-loose 2.0 5.0 dark red fruit 90% killed to the ground 2.0 attribute 9.0 very vigorous (highest survival) weak, 80% will die 2.0 moderately low yiedld 4.0 1.0 black fruit minimal resistance (15% resistant) 1.0 Blueberry ontology 6.0 30% rubs off loose 3.0 difficult to remove 1.0 40% buds destroyed 7.0 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet 2.0 6.0 30% heterogeneous sizes 5.0 45% heterogeneous sizes 1 bud/cane 1.0 30% willowy 6.0 between or average 2.0 9.0 excellent 6.0 moderatly firm too firm 9.0 5.0 semi firm 75% decayed 3.0 Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Color of leaves during autumn weather Observed color of leaves in autumn Syringetin 3-glucoside content syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit percent Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Sucrose content Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Fruit rot presence or absence Fruit petunidin galactoside content Petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content Rating of fruit decay after storage Visual rating of fruit decay Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus Plant scorch virus Plant scorch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt Visual observation of blueberry stunt Plant first bloom Plant first bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) germination rate Pollen germination rate Pollen germination rate Pollen Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Visual observation of exobasidium spot 0/1 pH Retention of fruit firmness while on bush Fruit firmness retention-bush firmness retention-bush Fruit Fruit texture Fruit texture Texture of mature fruit Number of days to 50% bloom Plant 50% bloom Plant 50% bloom Epi-catechin content Fruit epi-catechin Fruit epi-catechin Plant Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers Plant true to type true to type Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom Days to 50% re-bloom Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit Number of days to 5% ripe Plant Plant 5% ripe 5% ripe Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions Visual rating of overall fruit size Rating of fruit size Color of fruit Visual survey of fruit color Fruit Fruit myricetin glucoside Myricetin 3-glucoside content myricetin glucoside Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Percent of shoots with blight Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Fruit bloom amount Fruit bloom amount Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Number of upright berries 1-5 bud size scale Flower Susceptibility to flower thrips thrips Flower thrips monopodial Stem Stem monopodial Monopodial growth habit Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Self-fertility of cultivar Flower self-fertility Flower self-fertility Fruit early green early green Fruit Timing of early green fruit Flower Flower pollination rate pollination rate Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Visual observation of nematodes Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. Chill unit measurement Percent soluble solids Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy repeat bloom Plant repeat bloom Percent repeat bloom Plant Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Plant Plant growth habit growth habit size Fruit size rated on a scale Fruit size Fruit SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index Fruit Fruit flavonol content Flavonol content flavonol content Plant Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot exobasidium spot Plant exobasidium spot Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Uniformity of bud size Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Phenolic acid content Peonidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit appearance Fruit Attractiveness of fruit appearance appearance Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Caffeic acid content Uniform ripening uniform ripening Fruit uniform ripening Fruit 50% re-bloom Number of days to 50% re-bloom Plant Plant 50% re-bloom glucose content Glucose content Fruit Fruit glucose content Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) Plant Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker Plant blight-canker blight-canker Percent of fruit rot Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured Peonidin arabinoside content Fruit peonidin arabinoside peonidin arabinoside Fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Days to 50% bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Fruit UV damage Amount of UV damage on fruit UV damage Fruit Rating of fruit firmness Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January Plant leaf to bloom ratio Plant leaf to bloom ratio Plant full bloom Plant full bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavanol content Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation Leaf Leaf rust resistance rust resistance Fruit color - wax removed color - wax removed Fruit Fruit color after wax removal mummy berry rot susceptibility Fruit Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot weight Fruit weight Fruit Average weight of fruit Fruit D-glucose content Fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content Computation of bush size based on height and width in January height x width measurement cm2 Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper phenolic acid Fruit Fruit phenolic acid Phenolic acid content Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Root white grubs white grubs Susceptibility to white grubs Root mummy berry blight susceptibility Shoot Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight Measurement of yield per acre Yield per acre as measured peonidin glucoside Peonidin glucoside content Fruit peonidin glucoside Fruit Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Visual observation of plum curculio Fruit cherry worm Fruit cherry worm Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm malvidin arabinoside content Malvidin arabinoside content Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Fruit 0-1 color scale Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content Fruit quercetin galactoside content Fruit quercetin galactoside content 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Total acid content Delphinidin arabinoside content Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Fruit delphinidin arabinoside flavor, 1-9 scale Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit Visual rating of picking scar on fruit Rating of picking scar Shoot expansion expansion Timing of shoot expansion Shoot Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits Fruit cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug Fruit cyanidin glucoside Cyanidin glucoside content Fruit cyanidin glucoside Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Visual observation of disease presence Susceptibility to blueberry maggot maggot Fruit Fruit maggot Flower petal fall Timing of petal fall Flower petal fall 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax growth index Fruit diameter diameter Fruit Average diameter of fruit Fruit penetration time Time elapsed for pentration Fruit penetration time average fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer Fruit Fruit average fruit firmness, measured firmness, scale Fruit Fruit firmness, scale Firmness of fruit estimation Titratable acidity of juice Juice titratable acidity Fruit Fruit Juice titratable acidity chlorogenic acid Fruit Fruit chlorogenic acid Chlorogenic acid content Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit mg/100 g of fresh weight temperature in celsius 1-9 scale uniform ripening mg/100 g Plant fruit number Plant fruit number Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Plant first ripe Plant Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe first ripe Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B1 content Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Susceptibility to gall midge gall midge Bud Bud gall midge D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. D-glucose content Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant Fruit ease of release Fruit ease of release Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Percent of fruit with rot Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Blueberry Shock Virus presence Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> vigor Plant Plant vigor Plant vigor Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe Days to 95% ripe algal blotch Stem Stem algal blotch Susceptibility to algal stem blotch Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) 1-9 scale leaf density Cyanidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight g/L DNA/stdDNA Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype Measurement of yield per plant 0-9 scale fruit flavor Fruit Fruit soluble solids Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids soluble solids Flavanol content flavanol content Fruit flavanol content Fruit mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Plant upright berries Plant upright berries Numer of upright berries mm 1-9 scale fruit color Fruit SWD adult mortality Fruit SWD adult mortality percent SWD adult mortality 1-9 scale plant vigor Visual observation of scale insects Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot Fruit alternaria rot Fruit alternaria rot Peonidin galactoside content peonidin galactoside Fruit Fruit peonidin galactoside Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. Stem lesion size Epi-catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Plant bud set Number of buds per cane Plant bud set Characteristic of fruit when bite into Rating of fruit crispness/texture Measurement of pollen germination rate Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number delphinidin glucoside Fruit Delphinidin glucoside content Fruit delphinidin glucoside Numer of upright flowers Plant upright flowers Plant upright flowers winter damage Stem Stem winter damage Measurement of damage from winter weather Fruit Malvidin galactoside content malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content 1-3 scale cluster tightness Plant DNA ratio DNA ratio Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant Plant days Bud frost damage Bud frost damage Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds Fruit color color Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit Count of number of berries per cup Count of numer of berries per cup Plant mineral soil adaptation index mineral soil adaptation index Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Plant Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content Fruit Fruit quercetin arabinoside content quercetin arabinoside content Retention of fruit flavor while on bush flavor-bush Fruit Fruit flavor-bush Peonidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B2 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Days to 5% ripe pH of juice from fruit Fruit pH Fruit pH Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Amount of winter damage on stem Bud winter moth Susceptibility to winter moth Bud winter moth Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. pH of fruit juice petunidin arabinoside content Fruit petunidin arabinoside content Petunidin arabinoside content Fruit Fruit total anthocyanin content Fruit total anthocyanin content Total anthocyanin in fruit Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Total phenolics content count Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Average time needed to penetrate fruits Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin glucoside content mg/L Fruit SWD oviposition success index count SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index count Fruit Percent of dead buds due to winter damage Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Myricetin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Chlorogenic acid content bush size Size of bush in January Plant Plant bush size Color of flowers recorded using available list Observed color of blooms brix citric acid content Fruit Fruit citric acid content Citric acid content Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Petunidin glucoside content petunidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit petunidin glucoside content Fruit picking scar Fruit Size rating of picking scar on fruit picking scar Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Visual rating of UV damage on fruit Amount of UV damage Fruit quercetin rutinoside content quercetin rutinoside content Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Fruit Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Plant width Plant width measured in centimeters Plant width Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Brix reading from 20 fruit Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Malic acid content cold damage Bud Bud cold damage The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) Stem gall wasp Susceptibility to stem gall wasp gall wasp Stem Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. Fruit malvidin glucoside content malvidin glucoside content Malvidin glucoside content Fruit firmness, measured Fruit Fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit measurement Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated anthracnose rot Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot Fruit Fruit anthracnose rot BLSHV presence Plant BLSHV presence Plant Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Visual observation of white grubs Fruit total acid content total acid content Total acid content Fruit 1-9 scale fruit size Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Visual observation of stem gall wasp Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer Fruit total phenolics content Fruit total phenolics content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin glucoside content mg/mL 1-9 scale fruit UV damange Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Visual observation of insect presence Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample Average diameter of 20 fruits Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug Plant stinkbug Plant stinkbug Plant aphids Susceptibility to aphids Plant aphids Percent of dead flowers Percent of flowers which have died due to disease Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin arabinoside content Percent of fruit that split from water Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Measurement of plant growth upright Malvidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Susceptibility to stem borers Stem Stem borers borers Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin galactoside content 1-3 scale plant vigor Susceptibility to scale insects scale insects Stem scale insects Stem Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Flower blight death Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas blight death Flower g/mm The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit bloom durability Fruit bloom durability Fruit Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Visual observation of thrips Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Plant fruit set Plant fruit set Percent fruit set Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus ring blotch Plant Plant ring blotch Glucose content Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Plant yield Plant yield Plant yield Visual observation of stem borers Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers Brix reading from fruit sample Measured from juice from a berry sample Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Visual rating of fruit yield Rating of yield on a scale Fruit caffeic acid Fruit Caffeic acid content caffeic acid Fruit total sugar content total sugar content Total sugar content Fruit g/100 mL Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Ferulic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Percent of rotted fruit Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. date Development time in years Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. 1-9 scale calyx Color of leaves in fall Leaf Leaf color color Peonidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight height x width measurement cm2 Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer Quercetin rutinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight plum curculio Fruit plum curculio Susceptibility to plum curculio Fruit cranberry worm Fruit Fruit cranberry worm Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm Stem phomopsis blight Stem Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight phomopsis blight Fruit late green late green Timing of late green fruit Fruit Citric acid content Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. cyanidin galactoside Fruit cyanidin galactoside Cyanidin galactoside content Fruit Fruit flavor Rating of the fruit flavor flavor Fruit Fruit sucrose content Fruit Sucrose content sucrose content Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) scale_of calyx on/off Fruit Presence of calyx at time of harvest Fruit calyx on/off catechin Fruit Catechin content Fruit catechin Plant 50% ripe Plant 50% ripe Number of days to 50% ripe 0-10 scale winter damage storage decay Fruit Fruit storage decay Amount of fruit decay after storage 1-3 scale pollen germination rate Delphinidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Fruit Cyanidin arabinoside content cyanidin arabinoside Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Fruit seed count Average seed count per fruit Fruit seed count Fruit ferulic acid ferulic acid Ferulic acid content Fruit canker Stem canker Stem Susceptibility to stem canker Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavonol content Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot Root phytophthora rot phytophthora rot Root 0-10 index Number of berries per cup Fruit number per cup Fruit number per cup Fruit rot Percent of fruit rot Fruit rot delphinidin galactoside Fruit Delphinidin galactoside content Fruit delphinidin galactoside Plant height height Plant height measured in centimeters Plant Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Fruit malic acid content malic acid content Malic acid content Fruit mite Bud Bud mite Susceptibility to bud mite Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin arabinoside content Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Fruit fructose content fructose content Fructose content Fruit 0-3 scale Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Amount of bloom ms 1-9 scale fruit ease of release SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit order of leaf and bloom emergence Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Effectiveness of self-pollination Petunidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Plant BLSHV sensitivity Plant ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus BLSHV sensitivity Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Bud Bud chilling requirement Chill units for 50% budbreak chilling requirement Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Measurement of bud set Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched Durability of bloom Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin glucoside content Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis leafhopper resistance Plant leafhopper resistance Plant grams Plant Plant BLSHV symptoms development time Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus BLSHV symptoms development time Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Days to 50% ripe Root nematodes Susceptibility to nematodes Root nematodes Average diameter of 30 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. 1-9 scale fruit picking scar kg buds/cane 95% ripe Plant 95% ripe Number of days to 95% ripe Plant Bud Bud size size Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Fruit Procyanidin-B1 content procyanidin-B1 content Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 Visual rating of plant vigor Bud winter hardiness winter hardiness Measurement of damage from winter weather Bud cm2 Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Kaempferol glucoside content SWD reproductive rate SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Fruit Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch Leaf bacterial scorch Leaf bacterial scorch A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Plant growth and yield due to soil Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Fructose content Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. 1-9 scale cluster tightness Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Fruit Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit blue/ripe Fruit blue/ripe Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. Amount of winter damage on scale Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Fungal lesion size Stem Stem lesion size lesion size Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Percent of dead buds from frost damage Number of seeds per fruit Average number of seeds per fruit Petunidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Plant stunt Plant stunt Susceptibility to blueberry stunt Rating of fruit appearance Visual rating of fruit appearance Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Visual rating of cluster tightness Percent of fruit set on the plant measured Percent fruit set leafhoper Leaf leafhoper Leaf Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Fruit splitting after wetting splitting after wetting Percent of fruit that split after setting in water Fruit Percent of repeat bloom Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured 1-9 scale 0-5Index Malvidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight hours Flower color Color of flowers flower color Flower Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 Visual rating of cluster tightness Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening Fruit Fruit green fruit drop green fruit drop 0-9 color scale Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Visual observation of phytophthora root rot Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Average weight of 25 fruits Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January Leaf to bloom ratio Survey of fruit texture on a scale Rating of mature fruit texture cm Malvidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Rating of plant growth habit Visual rating of plant growth habit Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Fruit kaempferol glucoside Fruit kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight 1-9 scale fruit texture N Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit 1-9 scale fruit firmness 1-9 scale fruit crispness Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. Number of upright flowers Number of upright flowers on the plant measured Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Average weight of 30 fruits Measurement of plant height Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Visual observation of aphids Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Fruit SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit SWD antibiosis Fruit SWD antibiosis 1-3 scale 1-9 scale fruit flavor Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January Measurement of plant width in centimeters Texture of fruit crispness Fruit crispness Fruit method_of 1-9 scale fruit decay Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Total sugar content measured in Brix 1-9 scale fruit appearance Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Fruit SWD resistance, oviposition success index count Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index scale 1-9 scale fruit yield Leaf density density Density of leaves in plant canopy Leaf Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Rating of calyx presence Visual observation of stem canker Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Reaction to leaf rust 1-10 scale winter hardiness Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch Visual observation of algal stem blotch 1-9 scale growth habit variable_of 1-5 index