USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRCL FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale all decayed 1.0 dark red fruit 5.0 FRFRM2 USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g TAC2 very dense canopy 9.0 MINSOIL Ohio State University MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index Blueberry consortium BSZ USDA-ARS-HCRL BSZ_BushSize_cm2 Blueberry consortium 5.0 60% killed to the ground moderately mush 3.0 Blueberry consortium FRSZ2 FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count GRIN-Vaccinium USDA-ARS-HCRL SDN Blueberry consortium SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count 9.0 too firm mostly firm 7.0 BMS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L Blueberry consortium TPC USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale CLUSTER FRFB Blueberry consortium FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL 1.0 1 bud/cane BLSV Blueberry consortium BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 USDA-ARS 2-3 buds/cane 2.0 SWDAMP GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% 5.0 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium PFRROT_FruitRot_% PFRROT YLD USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L Blueberry consortium CITAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium BLODUR BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL TOTAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L 50RP Blueberry consortium 50RP_50%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-TCHSL LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium LHR USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGAC PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FRROT Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% FRFRMMEAN USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm Ebrahiem Babiker CYGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium FRSP_FruitSplit_% USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRSP BLSHV Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year Blueberry ontology weak, most will die 1.0 Blueberry consortium FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date FRP USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium MBBL Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% Ebrahiem Babiker PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms PENTMEAN USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% FLBL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane BS2 LC_Color_0-1scale LC GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g Blueberry consortium CHAC Blueberry consortium PLWTH USDA-ARS-HCRL PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium COLDTL COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CC_Catechin_mg/100g CC BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale BS USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 1.0 difficult to remove Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research SS SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix Blueberry consortium mush 1.0 7.0 15% willowy 2.0 mostly tight SSP SSP_SolubleSolids_% GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 BLSHVP USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count GRIN-Vaccinium SWDVEPF Blueberry consortium 90% killed to the ground 2.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium KGC NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 NEM USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index USDA-ARS-TCHSL SWD Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FC FC_Color_0-9scale 3.0 weak, 70% will die BRF_75%Ripe_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium BRF 50% buds destroyed 6.0 SELF_SelfFertility_% SELF USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium Ebrahiem Babiker FRDIA2 FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm USDA-ARS-TCHSL PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm USDA-ARS-HCRL PLHGT Blueberry consortium low yield 3.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS ANFR ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 BDMT Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 weak, 80% will die 2.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRDIA Jeannie Rowland FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRSZ USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium DGAC DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSC Blueberry consortium FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale semi firm 5.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL FUB_FullBloom_date Blueberry consortium FUB moderately high yield 7.0 semi mush 4.0 BERRUPRGT Blueberry consortium BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count GRIN-Vaccinium REPEATBLM GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBFR MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium PEGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale USDA-ARS-GIFVL BLOOM Blueberry consortium SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count SWDLPF Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium VIG_Vigor_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL VIG Blueberry consortium PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium PEAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL 5.0 45% difficult to remove Blueberry consortium BBC USDA-ARS BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS STGW TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL TADA USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium very low yield 2.0 3.0 75% willowy BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 Blueberry consortium BLST USDA-ARS USDA-ARS-HCRL Ebrahiem Babiker LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale LBR 6.0 30% rubs off FRUV FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 5.0 average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) very tight 1.0 6.0 50% killed to the ground Blueberry consortium PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g PHENAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g PEGAC Blueberry consortium CR CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium 7.0 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Blueberry consortium DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g DGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL CALYX Blueberry consortium 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness USDA-ARS WINM WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FRUCC FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL 20% uniformly sized buds 4.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% POLR FRPH USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRPH_FruitJuice_pH Blueberry consortium GALL GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL 8.0 5% damage Blueberry consortium FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date FIB USDA-ARS-GIFVL light purple fruit 4.0 TTT_CultivarID_0/1 TTT USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL MONO MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 Blueberry consortium LRR Blueberry consortium LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVANC Blueberry consortium FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL North Carolina State University-PHHI FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g Blueberry consortium FAC mostly soft 2.0 60% will die 4.0 QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI QGC Blueberry consortium worst, heterogenous sizes 1.0 3.0 vigorous WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS WGR Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium DNARATIO DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA Blueberry consortium GFRD GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL SS3 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix 8.0 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet MGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium 7.0 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet Blueberry consortium SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 USDA-ARS SNL GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count FLWRSUPRGT 60% buds destroyed 5.0 4.0 70% killed to the ground 8.0 high yield, optimal 70% buds destroyed 4.0 moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) 6.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL 95RP Blueberry consortium 95RP_95%Ripe_day 40% buds destroyed 7.0 DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L Blueberry consortium DGLUCC USDA-ARS-TCHSL APH_SusToAphids_0/1 APH Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 5.0 average density canopy CAC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g USDA-ARS-GIFVL 5RP_5%Ripe_day Blueberry consortium 5RP PAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 NRBV SS5 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix medium-loose 2.0 very vigorous (highest survival) 9.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG2 VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale Blueberry consortium 6.0 moderatly firm stays on 9.0 Blueberry consortium 50B 50B_50%Bloom_day USDA-ARS-HCRL 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet 2.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL PF_PetalFall_date Jeannie Rowland PF CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium CYAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL 9.0 no damage Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS TAC TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS SCALE FRF2 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium 1.0 black fruit ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g ECC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI 8.0 5% willowy BLS USDA-ARS BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale USDA-ARS-HCRL WHBUD SWDRI GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index uniformly sized buds 1.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BLMAG BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 USDA-ARS-TCHSL STBL Blueberry consortium STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 2.0 2.0 very tart but sweetness TA2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL 3.0 75% decayed USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale Jeannie Rowland FRF dense canopy 8.0 75% damage 3.0 LGF_LateGreenFruit_date LGF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI QRC GRH USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale FRDMG FRDMG_FrostDamage_% USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium YIELDACRE_Yield_kg YIELDACRE GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium 6.0 light red fruit semi firm 5.0 moderately tight 3.0 7.0 15% damage 5.0 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 1.0 dense CYGAC Blueberry consortium CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL 8.0 5% heterogeneous sizes 7.0 15% difficult to remove 6.0 40% having calyx above average yield 6.0 POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale POLGR Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium large, deep, torn skin, wet 1.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCR Blueberry consortium FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale 30% decayed 6.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g DAC Blueberry consortium all calyx 1.0 1.0 no yield 7.0 30% having calyx 7.0 mostly firm Blueberry consortium NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% USDA-ARS-HCRL NFR 6.0 moderatly firm SUCC USDA-ARS-TCHSL SUCC_Sucrose_g/L Blueberry consortium 1.0 lots of damage Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g PGLC 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 8.0 Blueberry consortium PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 USDA-ARS PHTB mostly firm 7.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RB_50%ReBloom_day 50RB less dense canopy 1.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date EGF Blueberry consortium SS2_TotSugar_brix USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS2 North Carolina State University-PHHI PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g PB1C Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL YLDW YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FT FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale 60% heterogeneous sizes 4.0 entity 2.0 80% uniformly sized buds CLUSTER2 USDA-ARS-HCRL CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale Blueberry consortium FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g Blueberry consortium FWT2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL 3.0 50% uniformly sized buds small, dry 9.0 FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRAP 4.0 semi soft USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale HVSP USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale FREASE 2.0 90% rubs off loose (type 5) 5.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium TA3 3.0 80% killed to the ground short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) 7.0 45% damage 5.0 MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L Blueberry consortium MALAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL maximum resistance (>80% resistant) 5.0 5% difficult to remove 8.0 very easy to remove 9.0 60% having calyx 4.0 MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium MAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium FSP FSP_FruitSet_% light blue fruits 8.0 7.0 moderately loose LFD Blueberry consortium LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 FRFRMB MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGAC Blueberry consortium SWDOSIS SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium best, homogeneous 9.0 Blueberry consortium STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 STB USDA-ARS 5.0 semi firm 9.0 no calyx TA Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium 30% damage 6.0 moderately soft 3.0 4.0 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 9.0 aluminum blue fruits BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale BLSHVE GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium AGC Blueberry consortium AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI 1.0 killed to the ground moderately vigoroug (30% will die) 7.0 3.0 semi-loose canopy 5.0 balanced tartness and sweetness 8.0 5% decayed overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking 9.0 VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 Blueberry consortium VIG3 USDA-ARS-HCRL half having calyx (50%) 5.0 1.0 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) Blueberry consortium ALFR ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 USDA-ARS 20% buds destroyed 9.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale FRFRM Jeannie Rowland 60% difficult to remove 4.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 STCA 4.0 loose canopy 2.0 90% heterogeneous sizes USDA-ARS PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 PRR Blueberry consortium 2.0 90% willowy Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS CFW CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 Blueberry consortium FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g FWT USDA-ARS-GIFVL Highest 3.0 2.0 90% decayed ASTB ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 8.0 20% having calyx 4+ buds/cane 3.0 9.0 attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS GLUCC GLUCC_Glucose_g/L PLGRC GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm USDA-ARS-GIFVL SHEXP SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date Jeannie Rowland moderate resistance (45% resistant) 3.0 1.0 willowy 5.0 substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 3.0 5.0 45% rubs off 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness SWDRR GRIN-Vaccinium SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count Blueberry consortium 2.0 mostly mush 80% buds destroyed 3.0 Blueberry consortium Michigan State University WHWOOD WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale 4.0 60% decayed moderately low yiedld 4.0 ELFS Blueberry consortium ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 USDA-ARS 6.0 moderatly firm FRCL2 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FLTH USDA-ARS FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 4.0 light purple fruit short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) 8.0 2.0 light black fruit 9.0 extremely loose FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g Blueberry consortium FLAVONC USDA-ARS-TCHSL 6.0 loose (type 6) 3.0 loose 5.0 average vigorous, 50% will die FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRD average yield 5.0 10.0 no damage moderately loose canopy 2.0 dark purple fruit 3.0 7.0 40% killed to the ground vigorous (20% will die) 8.0 CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 Blueberry consortium CRFW USDA-ARS 90% difficult to remove 2.0 no damage 10.0 aluminum blue fruits 9.0 1.0 minimal resistance (15% resistant) attribute 7.0 15% decayed 8.0 30% buds destroyed PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS PC 3.0 dark purple fruit 15% heterogeneous sizes 7.0 9.0 stocky slight too tart but acceptable 4.0 1.0 very soft dark blue fruits 7.0 light blue fruits 8.0 90% buds destroyed 2.0 1.0 ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit 2.0 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 30% difficult to remove 6.0 6.0 slightly tart but good sweetness crunch 8.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium QAC semi mush 4.0 dark red fruit 5.0 still too tart 3.0 90% damage 2.0 3.0 moderately mush 9.0 very firm 1.0 mush 9.0 20% killed to the ground moderately dense canopy 7.0 Medium 2.0 2.0 80% having calyx no decay 9.0 above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 4.0 3.0 moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 1.0 weak Blueberry consortium SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count SWDOSIC GRIN-Vaccinium semi-loose 4.0 sweetness overpowering 8.0 3.0 75% rubs off 4.0 60% damage Lowest 1.0 30% heterogeneous sizes 6.0 7.0 slightly tart but sweetness overpowering PB2C North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet 6.0 5.0 45% decayed 4.0 60% rubs off 6.0 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 30% willowy 6.0 75% heterogeneous sizes 3.0 4.0 high resistance (75% resistant) 45% willowy 5.0 75% difficult to remove 3.0 excellent 9.0 5% rubs off 8.0 1.0 all buds destroyed on bush Blueberry consortium BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale BUDSZ Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research rubs off easily 1.0 1.0 black fruit 60% willowy 4.0 15% rubs off 7.0 above average dense canopy 6.0 MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium MGC North Carolina State University-PHHI mostly mush 2.0 2.0 light resistance (30% resistant) 6.0 above average vigorous (40% will die) 8.0 mostly loose 45% heterogeneous sizes 5.0 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 70% having calyx 3.0 2.0 between or average 2.0 light black fruit 9.0 too firm 1.0 awful 7.0 dark blue fruits 9.0 short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 8.0 30% killed to the ground 6.0 light red fruit acronym 4.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Flavanol content Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. kg Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Days to 50% bloom Procyanidin-B2 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Visual observation of insect presence Plant yield Plant yield Plant yield Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin glucoside content 0/1 Measured from juice from a berry sample Brix reading from fruit sample Fruit Fruit cyanidin galactoside Cyanidin galactoside content cyanidin galactoside Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush 1-9 scale fruit UV damange Fruit malic acid content Fruit malic acid content Malic acid content Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. Average diameter of 30 fruits Malvidin glucoside content malvidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit malvidin glucoside content flavor, 1-9 scale Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Plant 50% bloom Number of days to 50% bloom 50% bloom Plant Rating of yield on a scale Visual rating of fruit yield Fruit Fruit quercetin galactoside content Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content quercetin galactoside content Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of stem gall wasp Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp mg/100 g Plant Susceptibility to blueberry stunt stunt Plant stunt Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Rating of fruit size Visual rating of overall fruit size 0-10 index Citric acid content citric acid content Fruit Fruit citric acid content 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance Average diameter of fruit Fruit Fruit diameter diameter Visual observation of stem canker Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker Fruit color after wax removal color - wax removed Fruit color - wax removed Fruit 0-10 scale winter damage Bud winter moth Bud Susceptibility to winter moth winter moth Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Reaction to leaf rust Susceptibility to gall midge Bud gall midge gall midge Bud procyanidin-B1 content Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Procyanidin-B1 content Fruit Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Visual rating of cluster tightness Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit Bud Measurement of damage from winter weather winter hardiness Bud winter hardiness Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Fruit Attractiveness of fruit appearance Fruit appearance appearance Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) mg/mL Plant Number of buds per cane Plant bud set bud set Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Amount of winter damage on stem cm monopodial Stem Stem monopodial Monopodial growth habit Flower self-fertility self-fertility Self-fertility of cultivar Flower Durability of bloom Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched Plant growth and yield due to soil A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Visual observation of stem borers Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. Stem lesion size 1-9 scale Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Days to 50% ripe Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker Fruit crispness Fruit crispness Texture of fruit Root phytophthora rot Root phytophthora rot Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot Plant Plant exobasidium spot Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot exobasidium spot Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin galactoside content Fruit penetration time Fruit Time elapsed for pentration penetration time Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January Measurement of plant height Peonidin galactoside content peonidin galactoside Fruit Fruit peonidin galactoside Fruit chlorogenic acid chlorogenic acid Fruit Chlorogenic acid content Malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). 0-1 color scale Fruit anthracnose rot anthracnose rot Fruit Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot 1-9 scale fruit appearance Root Root white grubs Susceptibility to white grubs white grubs Leaf to bloom ratio Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January g/100 mL Stem phomopsis blight Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight phomopsis blight Stem 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. size Fruit Fruit size Fruit size rated on a scale Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Percent of dead buds from frost damage Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Glucose content 0-3 scale first ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Plant first ripe Plant Percent of dead flowers Percent of flowers which have died due to disease Susceptibility to nematodes Root nematodes Root nematodes Fruit pH pH Fruit pH of juice from fruit bloom durability The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit Fruit bloom durability Peonidin glucoside content peonidin glucoside Fruit peonidin glucoside Fruit Fungal lesion size lesion size Stem Stem lesion size method_of Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Fruit average fruit firmness, measured Fruit average fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer 1-3 scale pollen germination rate A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding Visual observation of algal stem blotch Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Bud cold damage cold damage Bud The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Total acid content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit Syringetin 3-glucoside content N Flower petal fall Timing of petal fall petal fall Flower Susceptibility to flower thrips thrips Flower thrips Flower Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season upright berries Plant Plant upright berries Numer of upright berries Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). count Uniform ripening Fruit uniform ripening uniform ripening Fruit 1-9 scale fruit firmness stinkbug Plant Plant stinkbug Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Percent of fruit that split from water Malvidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit total sugar content Total sugar content total sugar content Fruit Rating of fruit crispness/texture Characteristic of fruit when bite into leafhopper resistance Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis Plant Plant leafhopper resistance 1-9 scale uniform ripening Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Amount of bloom Flower color Flower flower color Color of flowers Visual observation of plum curculio Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Effectiveness of self-pollination percent Fruit Fruit storage decay Amount of fruit decay after storage storage decay Number of upright flowers on the plant measured Number of upright flowers Susceptibility to bud mite mite Bud Bud mite Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations Malvidin arabinoside content malvidin arabinoside content Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Fruit days Bud Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds Bud frost damage frost damage 1-3 scale Stem gall wasp Stem Susceptibility to stem gall wasp gall wasp Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm Numer of upright flowers Plant upright flowers Plant upright flowers Fruit total anthocyanin content Fruit total anthocyanin content Total anthocyanin in fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) Fruit Myricetin 3-glucoside content myricetin glucoside Fruit myricetin glucoside g/L Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Percent of dead buds due to winter damage Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin glucoside content Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. Amount of winter damage on scale 1-9 scale fruit flavor blight death Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas Flower Flower blight death Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Epi-catechin content Density of leaves in plant canopy density Leaf Leaf density Cyanidin glucoside content Fruit cyanidin glucoside Fruit cyanidin glucoside Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Catechin content g/mm Leaf leafhoper Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper leafhoper Leaf Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of scale insects Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Plant growth habit Plant growth habit Fructose content Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. date Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Caffeic acid content Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Plant first bloom Plant first bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Plant vigor Plant vigor Plant vigor Shoot expansion Timing of shoot expansion Shoot expansion Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Visual observation of aphids height x width measurement cm2 Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer Rating of fruit appearance Visual rating of fruit appearance mm Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin glucoside content Fruit glucose content Glucose content glucose content Fruit Average number of seeds per fruit Number of seeds per fruit Rating of fruit decay after storage Visual rating of fruit decay Firmness of fruit estimation firmness, scale Fruit firmness, scale Fruit Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Sucrose content Measurement of damage from winter weather Stem winter damage Stem winter damage Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Fruit late green late green Fruit Timing of late green fruit Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight total acid content Total acid content Fruit total acid content Fruit Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavonol content Flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant Plant DNA ratio Plant DNA ratio epi-catechin Epi-catechin content Fruit epi-catechin Fruit Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Fruit SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Leaf bacterial scorch Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch Leaf bacterial scorch Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) full bloom Plant Plant full bloom Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B1 content Rating of fruit firmness Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 1-9 scale fruit size Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size Bud size size Bud SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit Fruit weight weight Fruit Average weight of fruit Fruit bloom amount bloom amount Fruit Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Malic acid content Number of days to 50% ripe Plant 50% ripe 50% ripe Plant fruit set Plant fruit set Percent fruit set Plant Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Citric acid content Measurement of plant width in centimeters Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker Plant blight-canker Plant blight-canker Fruit Procyanidin-B2 content procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Sucrose content Fruit sucrose content sucrose content Fruit Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe Days to 95% ripe Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Brix reading from 20 fruit Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept Percent of rotted fruit Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. Petunidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight BLSHV presence Plant BLSHV presence Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest Plant 1-3 scale plant vigor 1-9 scale plant vigor Timing of early green fruit early green Fruit Fruit early green Delphinidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Total sugar content measured in Brix Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Plant mineral soil adaptation index mineral soil adaptation index Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Plant Days to 5% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush 0-9 color scale Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype Measurement of yield per plant Fruit Fruit fructose content Fructose content fructose content Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt Visual observation of blueberry stunt Measurement of plant growth upright Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Percent of fruit that split after setting in water Fruit splitting after wetting splitting after wetting Fruit Fruit firmness, measured Fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit measurement cherry worm Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm Fruit cherry worm Fruit Fruit delphinidin glucoside Fruit Delphinidin glucoside content delphinidin glucoside color Color of leaves in fall Leaf color Leaf Average weight of 30 fruits Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Flower pollination rate Flower Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations pollination rate Percent of shoots with blight Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Observed color of leaves in autumn Color of leaves during autumn weather Percent of fruit with rot Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Chlorogenic acid content Fruit Catechin content Fruit catechin catechin Cyanidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Rating of the fruit flavor flavor Fruit Fruit flavor flavor-bush Fruit flavor-bush Retention of fruit flavor while on bush Fruit Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Fruit kaempferol glucoside Fruit kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content Visual observation of phytophthora root rot Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Fruit Flavanol content Fruit flavanol content flavanol content Development time in years pH of fruit juice Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. Visual observation of white grubs Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs temperature in celsius Quercetin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-9 scale fruit ease of release Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Fruit cluster tightness Fruit Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits cluster tightness mg/L Fruit SWD adult mortality SWD adult mortality percent Fruit SWD adult mortality 1-9 scale cluster tightness Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 grams Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Myricetin glucoside content Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit Fruit color color bush size Plant Plant bush size Size of bush in January Fruit calyx on/off Presence of calyx at time of harvest Fruit calyx on/off Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH chilling requirement Bud Bud chilling requirement Chill units for 50% budbreak BLSHV symptoms development time Plant Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant BLSHV symptoms development time Fruit number per cup Fruit number per cup Number of berries per cup Susceptibility to plum curculio plum curculio Fruit Fruit plum curculio Average time needed to penetrate fruits Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Plant Plant width Plant width measured in centimeters width Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Petunidin glucoside content petunidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit petunidin glucoside content Caffeic acid content Fruit caffeic acid Fruit caffeic acid Delphinidin galactoside content Fruit delphinidin galactoside delphinidin galactoside Fruit 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax ferulic acid Ferulic acid content Fruit Fruit ferulic acid Plant height measured in centimeters Plant Plant height height Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers Plant true to type true to type Plant Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus 95% ripe Plant 95% ripe Plant Number of days to 95% ripe 1-9 scale fruit texture Pollen Pollen germination rate Pollen germination rate germination rate Fruit Fruit quercetin arabinoside content Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content quercetin arabinoside content Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids Fruit soluble solids Fruit soluble solids Plant BLSHV sensitivity BLSHV sensitivity ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant brix cranberry worm Fruit cranberry worm Fruit Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample Average diameter of 20 fruits Stem borers borers Susceptibility to stem borers Stem Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Average weight of 25 fruits mg/100 g of fresh weight Blueberry Shock Virus presence Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest 50% re-bloom Plant 50% re-bloom Plant Number of days to 50% re-bloom Total phenolics content Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Amount of UV damage Visual rating of UV damage on fruit Fruit rot rot Fruit Percent of fruit rot Susceptibility to scale insects scale insects Stem Stem scale insects Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 Visual rating of cluster tightness Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number Measurement of pollen germination rate Malvidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Percent repeat bloom Plant repeat bloom Plant repeat bloom Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured Percent of repeat bloom Computation of bush size based on height and width in January height x width measurement cm2 Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Phenolic acid content Susceptibility to blueberry maggot Fruit maggot Fruit maggot Rating of mature fruit texture Survey of fruit texture on a scale 1-9 scale fruit yield Visual survey of fruit color Color of fruit Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot mummy berry rot susceptibility Fruit Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation Leaf rust resistance Leaf rust resistance Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Fruit rot presence or absence Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Fruit Cyanidin arabinoside content cyanidin arabinoside Fruit UV damage Fruit UV damage Amount of UV damage on fruit Quercetin rutinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 1-9 scale fruit decay Rating of calyx presence Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Count of number of berries per cup Count of numer of berries per cup Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin galactoside content 1-10 scale winter hardiness Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Fruit seed count seed count Average seed count per fruit Fruit Fruit SWD antibiosis Fruit SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit SWD antibiosis Yield per acre as measured Measurement of yield per acre Fruit green fruit drop Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening Fruit green fruit drop Cyanidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight canker Stem Stem canker Susceptibility to stem canker hours ms Fruit picking scar Fruit picking scar Size rating of picking scar on fruit Fruit phenolic acid Fruit phenolic acid Phenolic acid content Color of flowers recorded using available list Observed color of blooms SWD oviposition success index scale Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale SWD resistance, oviposition success index count Fruit 1-5 index Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight Susceptibility to aphids Plant Plant aphids aphids buds/cane Days to 50% re-bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom blue/ripe Fruit Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit Fruit blue/ripe Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight variable_of Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Kaempferol glucoside content SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale Fruit SWD oviposition success index count SWD oviposition success index count Fruit Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured Percent of fruit rot Visual observation of exobasidium spot Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Delphinidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). Rating of picking scar Visual rating of picking scar on fruit D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. D-glucose content Visual rating of plant growth habit Rating of plant growth habit 1-9 scale growth habit Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Plant fruit number Plant fruit number 1-9 scale fruit picking scar growth index Fruit D-glucose content Fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant ease of release Fruit ease of release Fruit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Ferulic acid content cm2 1-9 scale leaf density Fruit Juice titratable acidity Titratable acidity of juice Fruit Juice titratable acidity Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Peonidin arabinoside content Fruit Fruit peonidin arabinoside peonidin arabinoside Number of upright berries Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Fruit SWD resistance index SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index DNA/stdDNA Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Visual observation of disease presence Petunidin arabinoside content Fruit petunidin arabinoside content petunidin arabinoside content Fruit Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Plant Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus scorch virus Plant scorch virus Peonidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-9 scale fruit color Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer total phenolics content Fruit Fruit total phenolics content Petunidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight order of leaf and bloom emergence 1-3 scale cluster tightness Plant ring blotch ring blotch Plant Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus 1-5 bud size scale pH 0-9 scale fruit flavor Fruit texture Fruit texture Texture of mature fruit One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set Stem algal blotch Susceptibility to algal stem blotch algal blotch Stem Plant Number of days to 5% ripe 5% ripe Plant 5% ripe Fruit Retention of fruit firmness while on bush firmness retention-bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Percent soluble solids Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer Measurement of bud set Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Visual observation of thrips Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Delphinidin arabinoside content Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. 0-5Index Percent fruit set Percent of fruit set on the plant measured 1-9 scale calyx Uniformity of bud size Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. Chill unit measurement scale_of Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January Plant leaf to bloom ratio leaf to bloom ratio Plant Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Visual observation of nematodes 1-9 scale fruit crispness mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Fruit Fruit alternaria rot alternaria rot Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed