5.0 half having calyx (50%) FRFRM FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium DGAC VIG USDA-ARS-TCHSL VIG_Vigor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g TAC2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL MALAC Blueberry consortium MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g CYGLC moderately low yiedld 4.0 3.0 75% decayed FRSZ2 Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count mostly mush 2.0 Blueberry consortium CYAC CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRUCC FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS NRBV NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 4.0 above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) light blue fruits 8.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL PLWTH PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDOSIC stocky 9.0 QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium QGC North Carolina State University-PHHI FRDMG USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRDMG_FrostDamage_% USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGAC Blueberry consortium PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL GRH USDA-ARS PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 PHTB Blueberry consortium FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% FLBL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% FRROT Blueberry consortium SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDAMP USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium WHBUD WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale 3.0 loose KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium KGC North Carolina State University-PHHI SSP_SolubleSolids_% Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SSP USDA-ARS SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 Blueberry consortium SCALE EGF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date 2.0 80% uniformly sized buds ASTB USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 80% buds destroyed 3.0 AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g AGC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI weak, 80% will die 2.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm PLHGT FWT USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g 2.0 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm STBL USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium DAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g aluminum blue fruits 9.0 slight too tart but acceptable 4.0 SELF Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL SELF_SelfFertility_% 60% damage 4.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale FRCR 50RP 50RP_50%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 3.0 semi-loose canopy Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL SDN SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 BDMT Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG2 VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale 9.0 no decay 1.0 mush 8.0 5% damage SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index Blueberry consortium SWDRI GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL MONO 5.0 45% willowy DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g DGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium COLDTL COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium 5.0 45% heterogeneous sizes maximum resistance (>80% resistant) 5.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% POLR USDA-ARS PC Blueberry consortium PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 APH Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS APH_SusToAphids_0/1 VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium VIG3 TADA TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium BLS USDA-ARS BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 Blueberry consortium TAC TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g USDA-ARS FRSP Blueberry consortium FRSP_FruitSplit_% USDA-ARS-TCHSL GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium POLGR POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 STB Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGAC Blueberry consortium CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g SS2_TotSugar_brix SS2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale LFD Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g MAC USDA-ARS CRFW Blueberry consortium CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium FUB FUB_FullBloom_date TTT TTT_CultivarID_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FRPH FRPH_FruitJuice_pH USDA-ARS-TCHSL 5.0 45% difficult to remove 4.0 60% will die Medium 2.0 BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 USDA-ARS BLSV Blueberry consortium 8.0 vigorous (20% will die) North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium PB1C PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g 95RP_95%Ripe_day Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 95RP TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL TOTAC Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium WHWOOD WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale Michigan State University 2.0 90% willowy PEAC Blueberry consortium PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL above average dense canopy 6.0 1.0 Lowest BSZ BSZ_BushSize_cm2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 7.0 moderately vigoroug (30% will die) 1.0 dense Jeannie Rowland SHEXP SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BLODUR Blueberry consortium QAC QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRFRMMEAN FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm Ebrahiem Babiker FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale FREASE Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL North Carolina State University-PHHI ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium ECC FLAVANC FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium mostly soft 2.0 1.0 black fruit 5% rubs off 8.0 2.0 light resistance (30% resistant) 3.0 weak, 70% will die GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count SWDVEPF USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FWT2 FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g FRSC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale moderately loose 7.0 5% difficult to remove 8.0 7.0 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 6.0 moderatly firm Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI CC CC_Catechin_mg/100g CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale CLUSTER USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 8.0 dense canopy FRDIA2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Ebrahiem Babiker FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm QRC Blueberry consortium QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium HVSP USDA-ARS-HCRL HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRD BS BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL WGR WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) 6.0 DGLUCC DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L Blueberry consortium CITAC PHENAC PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 5.0 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 8.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PEGAC PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g CLUSTER2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale black fruit 1.0 5.0 semi firm 1.0 all decayed PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g PB2C Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI 5.0 45% rubs off light purple fruit 4.0 MBBL MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g FLAVONC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium Blueberry ontology SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix SS Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium 50RB_50%ReBloom_day USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RB Blueberry consortium stays on 9.0 70% having calyx 3.0 3.0 still too tart FLTH Blueberry consortium FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 USDA-ARS SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium SWD 8.0 crunch 1.0 willowy Blueberry consortium BMS BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 USDA-ARS USDA-ARS CFW Blueberry consortium CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium CR 1.0 all buds destroyed on bush SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count SWDLPF GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRAP Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRFRMB FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 dark purple fruit 3.0 3.0 50% uniformly sized buds substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 5.0 7.0 mostly firm Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL TA moderately mush 3.0 50% buds destroyed 6.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix SS3 FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI FAC Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 FRFB Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL STCA STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 FRDIA FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland 50% killed to the ground 6.0 8.0 high yield, optimal Blueberry consortium BBC USDA-ARS BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 9.0 small, dry 1.0 worst, heterogenous sizes 6.0 moderatly firm 3.0 moderately tight 2.0 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet PFRROT PFRROT_FruitRot_% GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FSP_FruitSet_% FSP 1.0 all calyx PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGLC Blueberry consortium 7.0 dark blue fruits USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL TA2 5.0 dark red fruit loose (type 5) 5.0 semi mush 4.0 GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 GFRD Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL semi mush 4.0 Blueberry consortium LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index LHR North Carolina State University-PHHI 6.0 light red fruit balanced tartness and sweetness 5.0 Blueberry consortium BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 BLSHVP USDA-ARS-HCRL YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg YLDW USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium LC_Color_0-1scale LC medium-loose 2.0 CALYX CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale YLD 20% uniformly sized buds 4.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TA3 TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL 2.0 moderately loose canopy Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBFR Blueberry consortium MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% 50B_50%Bloom_day USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 50B CAC Blueberry consortium CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI 30% rubs off 6.0 15% willowy 7.0 30% heterogeneous sizes 6.0 GRIN-Vaccinium REPEATBLM Blueberry consortium REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% 60% difficult to remove 4.0 60% heterogeneous sizes 4.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix SS5 moderately dense canopy 7.0 30% killed to the ground 8.0 Blueberry consortium ANFR ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 USDA-ARS 1.0 rubs off easily 60% decayed 4.0 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) 1.0 too firm 9.0 FRF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale BUDSZ Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium 5RP_5%Ripe_day 5RP BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count BERRUPRGT GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium 9.0 attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane BS2 3.0 75% willowy USDA-ARS-TCHSL SUCC_Sucrose_g/L Blueberry consortium SUCC GRIN-Vaccinium DNARATIO DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA Blueberry consortium 4.0 light purple fruit 5.0 average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-HCRL LBR LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g PEGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium NEM Blueberry consortium NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 USDA-ARS BLSHVE BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% NFR USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium PF USDA-ARS-GIFVL PF_PetalFall_date Jeannie Rowland MGLC MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRF2 FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale nice pop, optimal firmness 8.0 STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS STGW FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSZ Blueberry consortium MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGAC 9.0 aluminum blue fruits FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date FIB USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g PAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRFRM2 FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N Jeannie Rowland BLST Blueberry consortium BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 WINM USDA-ARS 60% willowy 4.0 dark red fruit 5.0 no damage 10.0 6.0 slightly tart but good sweetness ALFR ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 2.0 90% buds destroyed 1.0 difficult to remove 8.0 sweetness overpowering 8.0 short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) 5.0 semi firm GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count FLWRSUPRGT SWDOSIS GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 9.0 excellent 4.0 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 9.0 20% buds destroyed FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRP 2.0 very low yield 40% buds destroyed 7.0 BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 Blueberry consortium BLMAG USDA-ARS GRIN-Vaccinium YIELDACRE Blueberry consortium YIELDACRE_Yield_kg acronym uniformly sized buds 1.0 9.0 overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale FT Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 Blueberry consortium SNL Blueberry consortium TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L TPC USDA-ARS-TCHSL 3.0 Highest average yield 5.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium BRF BRF_75%Ripe_date Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL GALL GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale LRR USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 1.0 lots of damage 2.0 light black fruit 1.0 1 bud/cane FC_Color_0-9scale FC GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium 3.0 75% damage nice pop, optimal firmness 8.0 9.0 very vigorous (highest survival) LGF LGF_LateGreenFruit_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium 15% decayed 7.0 90% heterogeneous sizes 2.0 1.0 less dense canopy Blueberry consortium MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI MGC FRCL2 FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL semi firm 5.0 Blueberry consortium ELFS ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 USDA-ARS USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium BLOOM BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale 90% damage 2.0 no yield 1.0 SWDRR GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count 6.0 above average yield 6.0 light red fruit 2.0 90% decayed 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet 8.0 9.0 no damage Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI CHAC CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g 4.0 semi soft 4.0 60% rubs off ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit 1.0 20% having calyx 8.0 30% having calyx 7.0 90% rubs off 2.0 9.0 20% killed to the ground moderately mush 3.0 FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale FRUV USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium killed to the ground 1.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Ebrahiem Babiker PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms PENTMEAN 7.0 15% difficult to remove very dense canopy 9.0 3.0 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium BLSHV BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year Blueberry consortium FRCL USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale awful 1.0 GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium PLGRC PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm 80% killed to the ground 3.0 GLUCC USDA-ARS GLUCC_Glucose_g/L Blueberry consortium Ohio State University Blueberry consortium MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index MINSOIL no damage 10.0 6.0 above average vigorous (40% will die) 1.0 mush 1.0 weak moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 3.0 5.0 average density canopy large, deep, torn skin, wet 1.0 3.0 moderately soft 9.0 extremely loose 9.0 very firm 90% killed to the ground 2.0 5.0 45% damage moderatly firm 6.0 30% damage 6.0 1.0 very soft 9.0 short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 8.0 5% heterogeneous sizes 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet 6.0 minimal resistance (15% resistant) 1.0 5% decayed 8.0 1.0 weak, most will die 40% having calyx 6.0 too firm 9.0 9.0 best, homogeneous 5.0 45% decayed 4.0 loose canopy entity 3.0 75% difficult to remove 2.0 long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 7.0 mostly firm 90% difficult to remove 2.0 7.0 40% killed to the ground 8.0 light blue fruits semi-loose 4.0 3.0 dark purple fruit 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 6.0 high resistance (75% resistant) 4.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 4.0 5.0 60% buds destroyed short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) 7.0 75% heterogeneous sizes 3.0 6.0 30% decayed 6.0 30% willowy 2.0 between or average mostly firm 7.0 7.0 15% damage 3.0 75% rubs off 60% killed to the ground 5.0 dark blue fruits 7.0 PRR USDA-ARS PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 Blueberry consortium attribute 3.0 moderate resistance (45% resistant) no calyx 9.0 7.0 15% rubs off 2.0 light black fruit slightly tart but sweetness overpowering 7.0 7.0 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 70% buds destroyed 8.0 30% buds destroyed 2.0 mostly tight 2.0 very tart but sweetness 8.0 5% willowy 2-3 buds/cane 2.0 3.0 4+ buds/cane 6.0 30% difficult to remove mostly mush 2.0 mostly loose 8.0 80% having calyx 2.0 4.0 70% killed to the ground 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 5.0 very easy to remove 9.0 15% heterogeneous sizes 7.0 average vigorous, 50% will die 5.0 moderately high yield 7.0 3.0 vigorous 1.0 very tight 6.0 loose (type 6) 4.0 60% having calyx low yield 3.0 Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) full bloom Plant full bloom Plant Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Percent of shoots with blight Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> maggot Susceptibility to blueberry maggot Fruit maggot Fruit Juice titratable acidity Fruit Fruit Juice titratable acidity Titratable acidity of juice DNA ratio Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant Plant Plant DNA ratio 1-9 scale plant vigor Procyanidin-B1 content Fruit Fruit procyanidin-B1 content procyanidin-B1 content 1-9 scale fruit crispness Plant width Plant width measured in centimeters Plant width Plant first ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Plant first ripe Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Root phytophthora rot phytophthora rot Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot Root Phenolic acid content phenolic acid Fruit Fruit phenolic acid Texture of mature fruit Fruit Fruit texture texture Plant Plant fruit set Percent fruit set fruit set Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit Measurement of plant width in centimeters Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January BLSHV symptoms development time Plant BLSHV symptoms development time Plant Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus Amount of UV damage Visual rating of UV damage on fruit Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Amount of winter damage on stem Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin arabinoside content Total anthocyanin in fruit total anthocyanin content Fruit total anthocyanin content Fruit seed count Fruit Average seed count per fruit Fruit seed count scale_of Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. pH of fruit juice Fruit delphinidin galactoside Fruit delphinidin galactoside Delphinidin galactoside content 1-9 scale fruit ease of release Visual observation of plum curculio Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio size Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size Bud size Bud Epi-catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit green fruit drop Fruit green fruit drop Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening Fruit flavor Fruit flavor Rating of the fruit flavor count Visual survey of fruit color Color of fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Average number of seeds per fruit Number of seeds per fruit Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit bloom amount Fruit bloom amount Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility early green Timing of early green fruit Fruit Fruit early green Fruit peonidin glucoside Peonidin glucoside content Fruit peonidin glucoside kg Stem canker Susceptibility to stem canker Stem canker Fruit Cyanidin glucoside content Fruit cyanidin glucoside cyanidin glucoside mg/100 g Flavanol content Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Bud frost damage Bud Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds frost damage Stem Stem monopodial monopodial Monopodial growth habit Days to 5% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Phenolic acid content Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Development time in years Cyanidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin galactoside content Flower petal fall Timing of petal fall petal fall Flower Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated first bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Plant first bloom Plant mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content Syringetin 3-glucoside content syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit percent Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Chlorogenic acid content Average weight of 30 fruits Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Visual observation of exobasidium spot Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot SWD oviposition success index count SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale Fruit Fruit SWD oviposition success index count Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Malvidin arabinoside content Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Visual rating of plant growth habit Rating of plant growth habit Bud winter moth Susceptibility to winter moth winter moth Bud Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush plum curculio Fruit plum curculio Susceptibility to plum curculio Fruit Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Percent of dead buds due to winter damage Fruit catechin Fruit Catechin content catechin Petunidin arabinoside content petunidin arabinoside content Fruit petunidin arabinoside content Fruit Plant scorch virus Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus Plant scorch virus Fruit ease of release Fruit ease of release Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant 1-9 scale 1-9 scale fruit size 0-5Index Durability of bloom Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Myricetin glucoside content Fruit SWD reproductive rate SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. Stem lesion size Fruit Malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content malvidin galactoside content Fruit Fruit size size Fruit size rated on a scale Plant Plant yield yield Plant yield Rating of picking scar Visual rating of picking scar on fruit Plant Number of days to 50% ripe 50% ripe Plant 50% ripe Percent of rotted fruit Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Glucose content rust resistance Leaf Leaf rust resistance Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Total sugar content total sugar content Fruit Fruit total sugar content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin arabinoside content Measurement of plant height Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin galactoside content anthracnose rot Fruit anthracnose rot Fruit Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot days 0/1 Plant Number of days to 5% ripe Plant 5% ripe 5% ripe Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Fructose content Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance Fruit penetration time Fruit Time elapsed for pentration penetration time Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe mm Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Ferulic acid content firmness retention-bush Fruit Retention of fruit firmness while on bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Percent soluble solids Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer Fruit ferulic acid ferulic acid Ferulic acid content Fruit Visual observation of white grubs Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Survey of fruit texture on a scale Rating of mature fruit texture Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Percent of fruit with rot thrips Flower Flower thrips Susceptibility to flower thrips Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number Measurement of pollen germination rate Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count cm2 Fruit Fruit weight Average weight of fruit weight Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU 1-9 scale fruit picking scar Average diameter of 20 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample Uniformity of bud size Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Fruit alternaria rot Fruit alternaria rot Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot cherry worm Fruit cherry worm Fruit Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm date Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Total sugar content measured in Brix mg/100 g of fresh weight Plant Number of days to 50% bloom Plant 50% bloom 50% bloom Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer height x width measurement cm2 peonidin arabinoside Fruit peonidin arabinoside Fruit Peonidin arabinoside content expansion Shoot Timing of shoot expansion Shoot expansion Stem Susceptibility to algal stem blotch Stem algal blotch algal blotch Susceptibility to white grubs white grubs Root Root white grubs Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. SWD adult mortality SWD adult mortality percent Fruit Fruit SWD adult mortality Cyanidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Characteristic of fruit when bite into Rating of fruit crispness/texture Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January Plant Plant leaf to bloom ratio leaf to bloom ratio ms 1-9 scale leaf density The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit bloom durability Fruit bloom durability g/L Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Plant repeat bloom Percent repeat bloom repeat bloom Plant Plant Plant bud set bud set Number of buds per cane Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Measurement of plant growth upright order of leaf and bloom emergence cold damage The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) Bud Bud cold damage Percent of fruit set on the plant measured Percent fruit set Fruit procyanidin-B2 content procyanidin-B2 content Fruit Procyanidin-B2 content citric acid content Fruit citric acid content Fruit Citric acid content Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Visual rating of plant vigor Plant Plant blight-canker Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker blight-canker Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January Leaf to bloom ratio Plant Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus Plant ring blotch ring blotch Plant Susceptibility to blueberry stunt stunt Plant stunt Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Visual observation of scale insects N Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Fruit uniform ripening uniform ripening Fruit Uniform ripening Visual observation of insect presence Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured Percent of fruit rot Fruit Texture of fruit Fruit crispness crispness Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Citric acid content Visual rating of fruit decay Rating of fruit decay after storage Plant vigor Plant vigor Plant vigor peonidin galactoside Fruit Fruit peonidin galactoside Peonidin galactoside content Visual observation of stem borers Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers 1-10 scale winter hardiness Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Fruit Fruit color - wax removed color - wax removed Fruit color after wax removal diameter Average diameter of fruit Fruit diameter Fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper 0-9 scale fruit flavor Stem gall wasp Susceptibility to stem gall wasp Stem gall wasp Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin arabinoside content Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Fruit Malic acid content Fruit malic acid content malic acid content Fruit kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content Fruit kaempferol glucoside Bud winter hardiness Measurement of damage from winter weather Bud winter hardiness Fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content D-glucose content Fruit Measured from juice from a berry sample Brix reading from fruit sample 95% ripe Number of days to 95% ripe Plant Plant 95% ripe quercetin rutinoside content Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Fruit Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush bacterial scorch Leaf Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch Leaf bacterial scorch 1-5 bud size scale 1-3 scale cluster tightness Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin glucoside content Visual observation of stem canker Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker Fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit Computation of bush size based on height and width in January height x width measurement cm2 Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Brix reading from 20 fruit appearance Attractiveness of fruit appearance Fruit appearance Fruit 1-9 scale fruit flavor Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit measurement Fruit firmness, measured Fructose content fructose content Fruit Fruit fructose content Fruit cyanidin galactoside Cyanidin galactoside content cyanidin galactoside Fruit Epi-catechin content epi-catechin Fruit epi-catechin Fruit Petunidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-9 scale fruit texture Procyanidin-B1 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. total phenolics content Fruit Fruit total phenolics content Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer Susceptibility to nematodes Root nematodes nematodes Root sucrose content Sucrose content Fruit Fruit sucrose content Plant Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Plant mineral soil adaptation index mineral soil adaptation index Fruit Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content quercetin arabinoside content Fruit quercetin arabinoside content Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Measurement of bud set 1-9 scale growth habit Percent of fruit that split after setting in water Fruit Fruit splitting after wetting splitting after wetting Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Total phenolics content Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Fruit glucose content Glucose content glucose content Fruit mg/L Plant aphids aphids Susceptibility to aphids Plant Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Total acid content Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured Percent of repeat bloom Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. Amount of winter damage on scale Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm flavonol content Fruit Flavonol content Fruit flavonol content 1-9 scale uniform ripening temperature in celsius Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Susceptibility to bud mite mite Bud Bud mite Percent of dead flowers Percent of flowers which have died due to disease Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Fruit Fruit late green Timing of late green fruit late green Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit Fruit blue/ripe Fruit blue/ripe Plant Plant fruit number Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations fruit number Fruit Malvidin glucoside content malvidin glucoside content Fruit malvidin glucoside content 1-9 scale calyx 1-9 scale fruit yield Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations 1-3 scale plant vigor Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. Chill unit measurement Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions pH of juice from fruit pH Fruit pH Fruit chilling requirement Bud chilling requirement Chill units for 50% budbreak Bud Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Rating of fruit firmness Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Number of upright berries 1-9 scale fruit appearance Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Percent of dead buds from frost damage Numer of upright berries Plant upright berries Plant upright berries Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B2 content Average weight of 25 fruits Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Flavanol content flavanol content Fruit Fruit flavanol content 0-3 scale Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Leaf leafhoper Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper Leaf leafhoper Visual rating of cluster tightness Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Stem winter damage winter damage Measurement of damage from winter weather Stem Visual rating of cluster tightness Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 pH Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit Visual observation of blueberry stunt Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale Amount of bloom Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe Days to 95% ripe Pollen germination rate Pollen germination rate Pollen germination rate Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated Stem phomopsis blight Stem phomopsis blight Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Days to 50% bloom g/100 mL growth index upright flowers Plant upright flowers Numer of upright flowers Plant Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin glucoside content Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Cyanidin arabinoside content cyanidin arabinoside Fruit Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Malic acid content Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Visual observation of stem gall wasp Delphinidin arabinoside content Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Fruit average fruit firmness, measured average fruit firmness, measured Fruit Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer Visual rating of fruit yield Rating of yield on a scale 1-5 index 1-9 scale cluster tightness Measurement of yield per plant Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype Flower pollination rate Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations Flower pollination rate Catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight hours Visual rating of fruit appearance Rating of fruit appearance Flower blight death Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas blight death Flower SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index SWD resistance index Fruit Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit color Fruit color Fruit SWD antibiosis SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit SWD antibiosis Fruit UV damage Fruit UV damage Fruit Amount of UV damage on fruit Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Rating of calyx presence caffeic acid Caffeic acid content Fruit caffeic acid Fruit Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. Average diameter of 30 fruits Petunidin glucoside content petunidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit petunidin glucoside content A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Plant growth and yield due to soil Fruit calyx on/off Presence of calyx at time of harvest Fruit calyx on/off grams Reaction to leaf rust Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Flower color Color of flowers flower color Flower 1-3 scale Flavonol content Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. 0-9 color scale Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Visual rating of overall fruit size Rating of fruit size Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content Fruit quercetin galactoside content Fruit quercetin galactoside content Plant height measured in centimeters height Plant height Plant mg/mL Plant BLSHV sensitivity BLSHV sensitivity Plant ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus 1-9 scale fruit firmness leafhopper resistance Plant Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis Plant leafhopper resistance Peonidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Number of upright flowers Number of upright flowers on the plant measured bush size Plant bush size Size of bush in January Plant Plant Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest Plant BLSHV presence BLSHV presence DNA/stdDNA 0-10 index Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin rutinoside content Density of leaves in plant canopy Leaf density Leaf density Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Fruit number per cup Fruit Number of berries per cup number per cup Days to 50% re-bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom Fruit rot presence or absence Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Visual observation of thrips Blueberry Shock Virus presence Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Fruit Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness Fungal lesion size lesion size Stem Stem lesion size Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Average time needed to penetrate fruits Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Effectiveness of self-pollination Percent of fruit that split from water Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Plant exobasidium spot Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Plant exobasidium spot Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Plant 50% re-bloom 50% re-bloom Plant Number of days to 50% re-bloom stinkbug Plant stinkbug Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug Plant Fruit petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content Petunidin galactoside content Fruit Fruit delphinidin glucoside Delphinidin glucoside content delphinidin glucoside Visual observation of disease presence Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin arabinoside content Fruit chlorogenic acid chlorogenic acid Chlorogenic acid content Fruit Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Plant growth habit Plant growth habit Plant true to type Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers Plant true to type Sucrose content Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Leaf color Leaf Color of leaves in fall color Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Observed color of leaves in autumn Color of leaves during autumn weather buds/cane Delphinidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Count of numer of berries per cup Count of number of berries per cup Visual observation of aphids Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Caffeic acid content Self-fertility of cultivar Flower self-fertility Flower self-fertility Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Visual observation of phytophthora root rot 0-10 scale winter damage Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin glucoside content Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed cm g/mm method_of Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite variable_of Size rating of picking scar on fruit Fruit picking scar picking scar Fruit Fruit SWD resistance, oviposition success index count Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index scale 1-9 scale fruit UV damange Visual observation of algal stem blotch Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch Firmness of fruit estimation firmness, scale Fruit Fruit firmness, scale borers Susceptibility to stem borers Stem borers Stem Susceptibility to scale insects Stem scale insects Stem scale insects Bud gall midge Bud Susceptibility to gall midge gall midge Observed color of blooms Color of flowers recorded using available list 1-3 scale pollen germination rate Fruit soluble solids soluble solids Fruit Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids 1-9 scale fruit decay Fruit myricetin glucoside Fruit myricetin glucoside Myricetin 3-glucoside content Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 Visual rating of plant vigor Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set 1-9 scale fruit color Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Visual observation of nematodes brix Fruit total acid content Fruit total acid content Total acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Kaempferol glucoside content Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm Fruit cranberry worm Fruit cranberry worm Fruit rot Fruit Percent of fruit rot rot Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Days to 50% ripe Retention of fruit flavor while on bush flavor-bush Fruit Fruit flavor-bush 0-1 color scale storage decay Fruit Amount of fruit decay after storage Fruit storage decay Measurement of yield per acre Yield per acre as measured