QRC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) 6.0 PGAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g sweetness overpowering 8.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g MGLC Blueberry consortium 8.0 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Blueberry consortium PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm GRIN-Vaccinium PLGRC 7.0 mostly firm FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale FRUV USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BLSV overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking 9.0 Blueberry consortium FRCL2 FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index SWDRI YLDW Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg USDA-ARS-HCRL CLUSTER2 Blueberry consortium CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 SCALE USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium TTT_CultivarID_0/1 TTT USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 9.0 no decay MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g MGC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 FRFRMB Blueberry consortium DGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% NFR USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium STBL STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research TA TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL FRF Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g FWT Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL very soft 1.0 MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g MGAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 3.0 Blueberry consortium PHENAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 NEM SSP SSP_SolubleSolids_% Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium 6.0 above average yield USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium PHTB PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g PEGLC Blueberry consortium FUB USDA-ARS-GIFVL FUB_FullBloom_date LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale Ebrahiem Babiker LBR USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix SS3 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) 1.0 Blueberry consortium BSZ BSZ_BushSize_cm2 USDA-ARS-HCRL SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research SS Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium BLSHV BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year GRIN-Vaccinium QGC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g 90% difficult to remove 2.0 6.0 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits MINSOIL Blueberry consortium Ohio State University MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index 4.0 light purple fruit USDA-ARS-HCRL HVSP Blueberry consortium HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale Blueberry consortium POLGR GRIN-Vaccinium POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGLUCC FRDIA2 FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-TCHSL slight too tart but acceptable 4.0 FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N FRFRM2 Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL no damage 9.0 USDA-ARS ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 Blueberry consortium ELFS FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% FLBL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA DNARATIO APH_SusToAphids_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium APH EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL EGF PFRROT_FruitRot_% Blueberry consortium PFRROT GRIN-Vaccinium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% POLR FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 USDA-ARS FLTH Blueberry consortium SHEXP SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL LFD Blueberry consortium LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL 45% difficult to remove 5.0 GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 Blueberry consortium GFRD USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRP FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date USDA-ARS-HCRL 9.0 very vigorous (highest survival) mush 1.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RB_50%ReBloom_day 50RB Blueberry consortium 9.0 stays on ASTB ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium SWDLPF GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count LHR Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index 8.0 5% willowy Blueberry consortium PC PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 USDA-ARS 5.0 maximum resistance (>80% resistant) mostly loose 8.0 FRSZ USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale DAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g 9.0 attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL TADA Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FRROT Blueberry consortium FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% PEGAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g 40% buds destroyed 7.0 mostly mush 2.0 SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix Blueberry consortium SS5 USDA-ARS-GIFVL LC_Color_0-1scale LC GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FT FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIC 3.0 moderately tight MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L MALAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIS PLWTH USDA-ARS-HCRL PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm Blueberry consortium FRFRM FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL 1.0 Lowest Highest 3.0 CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium CFW USDA-ARS-HCRL BLSHVP Blueberry consortium BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 8.0 light blue fruits USDA-ARS-HCRL CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale Blueberry consortium CALYX 6.0 loose (type 6) SS2_TotSugar_brix USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS2 Blueberry consortium 95RP_95%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-HCRL 95RP Blueberry consortium 5.0 substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 4.0 semi soft moderate resistance (45% resistant) 3.0 5RP_5%Ripe_day Blueberry consortium 5RP USDA-ARS-GIFVL balanced tartness and sweetness 5.0 BRF_75%Ripe_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium BRF Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRPH FRPH_FruitJuice_pH 3.0 weak, 70% will die less dense canopy 1.0 crunch 8.0 dark purple fruit 3.0 4.0 60% will die Blueberry consortium QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI QAC 5.0 average vigorous, 50% will die 60% willowy 4.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRDMG_FrostDamage_% FRDMG Blueberry consortium 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 5.0 Blueberry consortium FRFB FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL 4.0 20% uniformly sized buds MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% MBFR Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research 6.0 30% damage light blue fruits 8.0 3.0 75% damage USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGLC DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium ANFR USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 MONO USDA-ARS-HCRL MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BLMAG BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 5.0 dark red fruit USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium GLUCC GLUCC_Glucose_g/L Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research BUDSZ BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L CITAC 40% having calyx 6.0 Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% MBBL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SWD SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index Blueberry consortium 7.0 15% damage VIG3 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 BDMT USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium 30% willowy 6.0 vigorous 3.0 1.0 large, deep, torn skin, wet Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MAC MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g SNL USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 SWDRR SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium CAC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRCL USDA-ARS-HCRL 3.0 4+ buds/cane FAC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRF2 FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale VIG_Vigor_1-9scale VIG Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL moderatly firm 6.0 SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count SDN USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 2.0 90% rubs off USDA-ARS PRR Blueberry consortium PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 6.0 moderatly firm GRIN-Vaccinium SWDVEPF Blueberry consortium SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count CLUSTER Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale 30% difficult to remove 6.0 FWT2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI CHAC LRR LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVONC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g 80% buds destroyed 3.0 5.0 45% heterogeneous sizes 1.0 killed to the ground entity mostly soft 2.0 Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g PB1C Blueberry consortium BBC USDA-ARS BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 9.0 very firm between or average 2.0 light red fruit 6.0 KGC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g 9.0 short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 3.0 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 5.0 60% killed to the ground CRFW CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDAMP Blueberry consortium SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% USDA-ARS-HCRL FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRAP 2.0 mostly tight Blueberry consortium STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 USDA-ARS STB 6.0 50% killed to the ground GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium GALL 7.0 moderately vigoroug (30% will die) BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BLS average density canopy 5.0 30% killed to the ground 8.0 GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL GRH Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRSC 60% decayed 4.0 1.0 weak 1.0 all decayed 50RP Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50RP_50%Ripe_day above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 4.0 CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CYAC no calyx 9.0 8.0 30% buds destroyed STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium STCA BS BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium moderately loose 7.0 80% uniformly sized buds 2.0 5.0 average yield USDA-ARS WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 Blueberry consortium WINM black fruit 1.0 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 BMS 1 bud/cane 1.0 small, dry 9.0 TAC TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium 9.0 very easy to remove short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) 7.0 9.0 best, homogeneous FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count FRSZ2 Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium 4.0 semi mush WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale WHBUD USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium dense 1.0 Blueberry consortium BLODUR BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL very tart but sweetness 2.0 SUCC Blueberry consortium SUCC_Sucrose_g/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium BERRUPRGT BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count 9.0 too firm USDA-ARS-TCHSL PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g PAC Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium FSP FSP_FruitSet_% Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium CR USDA-ARS-GIFVL CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEAC BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale USDA-ARS-GIFVL BLOOM Blueberry consortium 8.0 5% decayed TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L Blueberry consortium TOTAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PB2C PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI 4.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL PF PF_PetalFall_date USDA-ARS-TCHSL TAC2 TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g Blueberry consortium 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet 6.0 dense canopy 8.0 BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 BLST USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium TA2 WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 Blueberry consortium WGR USDA-ARS 1.0 minimal resistance (15% resistant) mostly mush 2.0 TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L TPC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL very dense canopy 9.0 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet 8.0 2.0 80% having calyx 7.0 15% decayed aluminum blue fruits 9.0 moderately dense canopy 7.0 BS2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane 90% damage 2.0 75% willowy 3.0 5.0 45% willowy 50B USDA-ARS-HCRL 50B_50%Bloom_day Blueberry consortium 30% rubs off 6.0 15% rubs off 7.0 4.0 70% buds destroyed Blueberry consortium CYGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g 3.0 75% heterogeneous sizes all buds destroyed on bush 1.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date Blueberry consortium FIB Blueberry consortium CC_Catechin_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI CC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI ECC ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g half having calyx (50%) 5.0 FLWRSUPRGT FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet 7.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium PLHGT PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FREASE FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g FRUCC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 4.0 loose canopy Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL TA3 5.0 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 20% having calyx 8.0 above average dense canopy 6.0 Michigan State University WHWOOD WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale Blueberry consortium 6.0 light red fruit excellent 9.0 7.0 15% willowy FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRDIA FRFRMMEAN FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g FLAVANC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 1.0 ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit 70% killed to the ground 4.0 LGF_LateGreenFruit_date LGF Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL 2.0 90% willowy FRD FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 2.0 medium-loose ALFR ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium lots of damage 1.0 2.0 light black fruit PGLC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 2.0 SELF SELF_SelfFertility_% USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 4.0 semi-loose 7.0 30% having calyx 5% difficult to remove 8.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g CYGLC YIELDACRE_Yield_kg YIELDACRE Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium BLSHVE Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale difficult to remove 1.0 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness 3.0 70% having calyx 5.0 45% rubs off Blueberry consortium COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius COLDTL USDA-ARS-GIFVL dark red fruit 5.0 75% difficult to remove 3.0 no damage 10.0 5.0 semi firm 4.0 light purple fruit Blueberry consortium STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 STGW USDA-ARS 6.0 moderatly firm 3.0 75% decayed FC_Color_0-9scale Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium FC 60% damage 4.0 5.0 semi firm FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCR Blueberry consortium 2-3 buds/cane 2.0 very tight 1.0 NRBV USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 3.0 moderately soft extremely loose 9.0 semi-loose canopy 3.0 4.0 semi mush no damage 10.0 rubs off easily 1.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL YLD Blueberry consortium YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale 45% decayed 5.0 3.0 low yield Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% REPEATBLM FRSP_FruitSplit_% FRSP Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PENTMEAN PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-TCHSL VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale VIG2 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 2.0 90% decayed 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 2.0 90% buds destroyed moderately high yield 7.0 7.0 40% killed to the ground dark blue fruits 7.0 60% difficult to remove 4.0 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 1.0 no yield 3.0 moderately mush mostly firm 7.0 20% killed to the ground 9.0 attribute 3.0 50% uniformly sized buds 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 7.0 5.0 45% damage 60% buds destroyed 5.0 6.0 30% heterogeneous sizes high resistance (75% resistant) 4.0 6.0 slightly tart but good sweetness 3.0 dark purple fruit uniformly sized buds 1.0 mush 1.0 2.0 Medium 3.0 75% rubs off 2.0 light black fruit 8.0 short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) 4.0 60% rubs off 6.0 50% buds destroyed 2.0 weak, 80% will die 4.0 60% heterogeneous sizes 15% difficult to remove 7.0 9.0 aluminum blue fruits 6.0 above average vigorous (40% will die) 80% killed to the ground 3.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI AGC AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium awful 1.0 7.0 mostly firm very low yield 2.0 3.0 still too tart 2.0 moderately loose canopy 2.0 light resistance (30% resistant) moderately mush 3.0 5% damage 8.0 moderately low yiedld 4.0 1.0 weak, most will die 2.0 long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) worst, heterogenous sizes 1.0 5.0 semi firm 90% killed to the ground 2.0 1.0 black fruit 5% rubs off 8.0 average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 5.0 willowy 1.0 9.0 stocky loose (type 5) 5.0 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness slightly tart but sweetness overpowering 7.0 all calyx 1.0 9.0 too firm dark blue fruits 7.0 15% heterogeneous sizes 7.0 20% buds destroyed 9.0 loose 3.0 8.0 vigorous (20% will die) 90% heterogeneous sizes 2.0 8.0 high yield, optimal 60% having calyx 4.0 Blueberry ontology acronym 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet 2.0 30% decayed 6.0 5% heterogeneous sizes 8.0 1-3 scale plant vigor Fruit Fruit delphinidin galactoside Delphinidin galactoside content delphinidin galactoside Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin galactoside content Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper leafhoper Leaf Leaf leafhoper Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Visual rating of cluster tightness flavor, 1-9 scale Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Fruit phenolic acid Phenolic acid content phenolic acid Fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). Stem Susceptibility to scale insects scale insects Stem scale insects Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit 1-9 scale fruit appearance Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Durability of bloom Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched Chill units for 50% budbreak Bud Bud chilling requirement chilling requirement Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug 0-5Index Texture of mature fruit Fruit texture Fruit texture Stem winter damage Measurement of damage from winter weather Stem winter damage flower color Flower color Flower Color of flowers Root nematodes Root Susceptibility to nematodes nematodes Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom Days to 50% re-bloom Stem lesion size Fungal lesion size lesion size Stem Plant repeat bloom Percent repeat bloom Plant repeat bloom Leaf density Density of leaves in plant canopy Leaf density Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit Fruit bloom amount bloom amount Fruit SWD reproductive rate SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Brix reading from fruit sample Measured from juice from a berry sample Rating of mature fruit texture Survey of fruit texture on a scale temperature in celsius 1-9 scale fruit color Amount of UV damage on fruit Fruit UV damage UV damage Fruit flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Fruit Flavonol content Fruit SWD adult mortality SWD adult mortality percent SWD adult mortality Fruit Development time in years ms Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening Fruit green fruit drop green fruit drop Fruit Fruit petunidin arabinoside content Petunidin arabinoside content Fruit petunidin arabinoside content 1-9 scale plant vigor If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis Fruit cranberry worm Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm cranberry worm Fruit count Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. Percent of rotted fruit Fruit Fruit blue/ripe Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit blue/ripe Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Percent of dead buds due to winter damage Plant Plant height height Plant height measured in centimeters Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Ferulic acid content Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Glucose content Plant ring blotch Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus Plant ring blotch percent Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers Visual observation of stem borers Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Flavanol content Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. bud set Plant bud set Number of buds per cane Plant Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Malic acid content Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Texture of fruit crispness Fruit Fruit crispness Leaf to bloom ratio Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January g/L mineral soil adaptation index Plant Plant mineral soil adaptation index Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Average time needed to penetrate fruits Measurement of bud set Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Yield per acre as measured Measurement of yield per acre Visual rating of fruit appearance Rating of fruit appearance Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant Plant BLSHV symptoms development time BLSHV symptoms development time scale_of Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. pH of fruit juice brix penetration time Fruit Fruit penetration time Time elapsed for pentration Syringetin 3-glucoside content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content Chill unit measurement Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 Fruit Fruit total anthocyanin content Total anthocyanin in fruit total anthocyanin content Fruit number per cup Number of berries per cup Fruit number per cup Visual observation of blueberry stunt Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt cm2 Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. Fruit color - wax removed Fruit color after wax removal Fruit color - wax removed Malvidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B1 content 1-9 scale leaf density Stem Susceptibility to algal stem blotch Stem algal blotch algal blotch Timing of petal fall petal fall Flower Flower petal fall Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) mg/100 g Monopodial growth habit monopodial Stem Stem monopodial N bacterial scorch Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch Leaf Leaf bacterial scorch Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin arabinoside content Retention of fruit firmness while on bush firmness retention-bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Fruit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin galactoside content Percent of dead buds from frost damage Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Fruit weight Fruit weight Average weight of fruit Fruit picking scar Size rating of picking scar on fruit Fruit picking scar Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit fruit set Percent fruit set Plant Plant fruit set Color of fruit Visual survey of fruit color Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush fructose content Fruit Fructose content Fruit fructose content mg/100 g of fresh weight Fruit SWD resistance index SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index Leaf Leaf rust resistance Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation rust resistance Rating of fruit decay after storage Visual rating of fruit decay Fruit size rated on a scale Fruit size size Fruit Visual rating of cluster tightness Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit ease of release ease of release Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Brix reading from 20 fruit 0/1 Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight calyx on/off Fruit calyx on/off Presence of calyx at time of harvest Fruit caffeic acid Caffeic acid content Fruit Fruit caffeic acid 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax Plant Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker Plant blight-canker blight-canker height x width measurement cm2 Computation of bush size based on height and width in January 1-9 scale fruit picking scar Cyanidin glucoside content Fruit cyanidin glucoside Fruit cyanidin glucoside Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Visual observation of nematodes Visual observation of algal stem blotch Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch canker Stem Stem canker Susceptibility to stem canker Procyanidin-B2 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight mg/L Measurement of yield per plant Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Total acid content Visual observation of plum curculio Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Number of upright flowers on the plant measured Number of upright flowers g/100 mL 1-9 scale Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Kaempferol glucoside content Rating of calyx presence Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin arabinoside content Fruit glucose content glucose content Fruit Glucose content Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest Plant BLSHV presence Plant BLSHV presence Total sugar content total sugar content Fruit Fruit total sugar content Quercetin rutinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). procyanidin-B1 content Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Procyanidin-B1 content Fruit Plant stunt Plant stunt Susceptibility to blueberry stunt Rating of fruit crispness/texture Characteristic of fruit when bite into petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content Fruit Petunidin galactoside content Average number of seeds per fruit Number of seeds per fruit Cyanidin arabinoside content Fruit Fruit cyanidin arabinoside cyanidin arabinoside 1-3 scale pollen germination rate Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Attractiveness of fruit appearance Fruit Fruit appearance appearance Bud winter hardiness Measurement of damage from winter weather Bud winter hardiness Fruit alternaria rot Fruit alternaria rot Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Fruit anthracnose rot Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot Fruit anthracnose rot Percent of fruit that split after setting in water splitting after wetting Fruit splitting after wetting Fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Visual observation of stem canker Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker 1-9 scale fruit UV damange D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. D-glucose content Percent of repeat bloom Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured date Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin glucoside content height x width measurement cm2 Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit Plant vigor Plant vigor Plant vigor Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Peonidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Visual observation of white grubs Rating of plant growth habit Visual rating of plant growth habit pH of juice from fruit Fruit pH pH Fruit Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set Plant Number of days to 95% ripe 95% ripe Plant 95% ripe Petunidin glucoside content petunidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit petunidin glucoside content Visual rating of UV damage on fruit Amount of UV damage delphinidin arabinoside Fruit Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Delphinidin arabinoside content Chlorogenic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Effectiveness of self-pollination Fruit seed count Fruit Average seed count per fruit seed count Fruit Catechin content catechin Fruit catechin Plant exobasidium spot Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Plant exobasidium spot Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight 1-9 scale fruit yield Fruit kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content kaempferol glucoside Fruit Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Days to 50% bloom Peonidin glucoside content peonidin glucoside Fruit Fruit peonidin glucoside Uniformity of bud size Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content Fruit quercetin galactoside content quercetin galactoside content Fruit Days to 5% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Stem phomopsis blight Stem phomopsis blight Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight 1-9 scale fruit size Number of days to 50% bloom 50% bloom Plant 50% bloom Plant Peonidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Blueberry Shock Virus presence Fruit Fruit malvidin glucoside content Malvidin glucoside content malvidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin glucoside content Amount of fruit decay after storage Fruit storage decay Fruit storage decay Shoot Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight BLSHV sensitivity Plant Plant BLSHV sensitivity ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus Timing of early green fruit Fruit Fruit early green early green 0-9 scale fruit flavor total phenolics content Fruit Fruit total phenolics content Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer Fruit flavor-bush Fruit flavor-bush Retention of fruit flavor while on bush buds/cane Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Color of leaves during autumn weather Observed color of leaves in autumn Fruit myricetin glucoside Myricetin 3-glucoside content Fruit myricetin glucoside A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Plant growth and yield due to soil Flower blight death blight death Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas Flower Delphinidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight days SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit Petunidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 5% ripe Number of days to 5% ripe Plant Plant 5% ripe Fruit Fruit rot Percent of fruit rot rot Fruit chlorogenic acid chlorogenic acid Chlorogenic acid content Fruit Stem Susceptibility to stem gall wasp gall wasp Stem gall wasp diameter Fruit diameter Fruit Average diameter of fruit Plant Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis leafhopper resistance Plant leafhopper resistance Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Pollen germination rate Pollen Pollen germination rate germination rate Plant first ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Plant first ripe Measurement of plant width in centimeters Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January Uniform ripening uniform ripening Fruit uniform ripening Fruit Fruit Fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content D-glucose content Observed color of blooms Color of flowers recorded using available list Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Visual observation of phytophthora root rot Amount of bloom Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Myricetin glucoside content 1-5 index Plant Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) full bloom Plant full bloom quercetin rutinoside content Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Fruit 1-9 scale fruit texture Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Percent of shoots with blight flavanol content Fruit Fruit flavanol content Flavanol content variable_of Fruit rot presence or absence Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm 1-9 scale uniform ripening 0-10 index 0-1 color scale Sucrose content Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Amount of winter damage on scale Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations 1-9 scale calyx 1-5 bud size scale Plant Plant yield Plant yield yield Peonidin galactoside content Fruit peonidin galactoside peonidin galactoside Fruit Plant leaf to bloom ratio Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January leaf to bloom ratio Plant Bud frost damage frost damage Bud Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds Average diameter of 20 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample maggot Fruit maggot Susceptibility to blueberry maggot Fruit Fruit epi-catechin Fruit epi-catechin Epi-catechin content Susceptibility to winter moth Bud winter moth winter moth Bud Stem borers Stem borers Susceptibility to stem borers Delphinidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit delphinidin glucoside delphinidin glucoside soluble solids Fruit Fruit soluble solids Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Total phenolics content Plant Size of bush in January Plant bush size bush size malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content Fruit Malvidin galactoside content Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Visual observation of exobasidium spot Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Plant DNA ratio Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant DNA ratio Plant Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Percent of fruit with rot 1-3 scale cluster tightness Rating of fruit size Visual rating of overall fruit size peonidin arabinoside Fruit peonidin arabinoside Peonidin arabinoside content Fruit Amount of winter damage on stem Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions Susceptibility to bud mite Bud mite Bud mite 1-9 scale fruit decay Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Fructose content Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Percent of fruit rot Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug stinkbug Plant stinkbug Plant Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Visual observation of stem gall wasp Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Procyanidin-B2 content 1-10 scale winter hardiness Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Phenolic acid content Total sugar content measured in Brix Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). total acid content Total acid content Fruit total acid content Fruit Flower pollination rate Flower pollination rate Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Visual observation of insect presence Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Susceptibility to gall midge gall midge Bud gall midge Bud Rating of yield on a scale Visual rating of fruit yield Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations hours Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot ferulic acid Fruit Fruit ferulic acid Ferulic acid content Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Reaction to leaf rust Fruit bloom durability Fruit The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit bloom durability white grubs Root Root white grubs Susceptibility to white grubs 1-9 scale fruit crispness Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit cyanidin galactoside Cyanidin galactoside content Fruit Fruit cyanidin galactoside Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Malvidin arabinoside content malvidin arabinoside content Fruit Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite growth habit Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Plant Plant growth habit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Caffeic acid content 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing 1-9 scale cluster tightness Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Bud The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) Bud cold damage cold damage self-fertility Flower self-fertility Self-fertility of cultivar Flower Rating of fruit firmness Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Rating of picking scar Visual rating of picking scar on fruit Firmness of fruit measurement firmness, measured Fruit firmness, measured Fruit 1-3 scale Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin galactoside content SWD antibiosis SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit Fruit Fruit SWD antibiosis Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January Measurement of plant height Plant upright flowers Numer of upright flowers upright flowers Plant first bloom Plant Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Plant first bloom mm Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index Fruit sucrose content Sucrose content Fruit sucrose content scorch virus Plant Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus Plant scorch virus Titratable acidity of juice Juice titratable acidity Fruit Juice titratable acidity Fruit 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU growth index Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Average weight of 30 fruits Plant upright berries Plant upright berries Numer of upright berries Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin galactoside content Percent of fruit that split from water Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Fruit color Fruit color Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 aphids Susceptibility to aphids Plant Plant aphids Catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight expansion Shoot Shoot expansion Timing of shoot expansion cm method_of Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm 1-9 scale fruit ease of release One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale order of leaf and bloom emergence Days to 50% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Fruit late green Timing of late green fruit Fruit late green Fruit Fruit firmness, scale firmness, scale Firmness of fruit estimation Visual observation of disease presence Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch 0-3 scale 1-9 scale growth habit Stem lesion size Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. 1-9 scale fruit flavor Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) 1-9 scale fruit firmness Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale SWD resistance, oviposition success index count SWD oviposition success index scale Fruit Visual observation of scale insects Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits Fruit 50% ripe Plant Plant 50% ripe Number of days to 50% ripe Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content quercetin arabinoside content Fruit Fruit quercetin arabinoside content Fruit SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index count Fruit SWD oviposition success index count Plant width measured in centimeters Plant width width Plant Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Epi-catechin content Color of leaves in fall Leaf color Leaf color Plant true to type Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers Plant true to type Fruit citric acid content Fruit citric acid content Citric acid content Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of plant growth upright Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters g/mm Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Visual observation of aphids Average diameter of 30 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. Plant 50% re-bloom Plant 50% re-bloom Number of days to 50% re-bloom Plant Plant fruit number fruit number Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Percent of dead flowers Percent of flowers which have died due to disease average fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer Fruit average fruit firmness, measured Fruit DNA/stdDNA Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Percent fruit set Percent of fruit set on the plant measured mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Count of number of berries per cup Count of numer of berries per cup kg Rating of the fruit flavor flavor Fruit Fruit flavor Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus pH Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Citric acid content size Bud size Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size Bud malic acid content Fruit Malic acid content Fruit malic acid content Days to 95% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe mg/mL Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavonol content Flower Flower thrips thrips Susceptibility to flower thrips 0-10 scale winter damage Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Average weight of 25 fruits Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Number of upright berries Numer of upright berries on the plant measured grams Fruit Fruit cherry worm cherry worm Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin arabinoside content Root phytophthora rot Root Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot phytophthora rot Fruit plum curculio Susceptibility to plum curculio Fruit plum curculio 0-9 color scale Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer Percent soluble solids Visual observation of thrips Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Measurement of pollen germination rate Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number