USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 ALFR 90% difficult to remove 2.0 15% difficult to remove 7.0 Lowest 1.0 9.0 very dense canopy MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MAC STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL STCA Blueberry consortium 5.0 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 70% killed to the ground PEGLC Blueberry consortium PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL mostly firm 7.0 3.0 50% uniformly sized buds Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL POLR POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% above average yield 6.0 above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 4.0 FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FRUV Blueberry consortium 5.0 semi firm 70% buds destroyed 4.0 very firm 9.0 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium SNL SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL BSZ_BushSize_cm2 BSZ 40% having calyx 6.0 5.0 average vigorous, 50% will die USDA-ARS GLUCC GLUCC_Glucose_g/L Blueberry consortium 7.0 slightly tart but sweetness overpowering minimal resistance (15% resistant) 1.0 CITAC CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-HCRL FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date Blueberry consortium FRP QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium QGC North Carolina State University-PHHI USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BMS BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 mostly tight 2.0 SCALE USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 USDA-ARS-TCHSL LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale LRR Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour CR FLTH USDA-ARS FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 Blueberry consortium CYGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L TPC USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYAC CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium LGF_LateGreenFruit_date LGF USDA-ARS-GIFVL MBBL Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% Blueberry consortium 5% willowy 8.0 7.0 mostly firm SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDRR above average vigorous (40% will die) 6.0 CFW USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 North Carolina State University-PHHI AGC AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium 9.0 20% buds destroyed Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research BUDSZ Blueberry consortium BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale PGAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium CYGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium WHBUD USDA-ARS-HCRL WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale Blueberry consortium DGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g 10.0 no damage USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium SWD SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index USDA-ARS APH Blueberry consortium APH_SusToAphids_0/1 20% uniformly sized buds 4.0 KGC Blueberry consortium KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI USDA-ARS-HCRL PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm Blueberry consortium PLWTH Blueberry consortium FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVANC PFRROT_FruitRot_% Blueberry consortium PFRROT GRIN-Vaccinium small, dry 9.0 CLUSTER2 USDA-ARS-HCRL CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale Blueberry consortium LC LC_Color_0-1scale Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium TA3 TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 4.0 moderately low yiedld USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRPH FRPH_FruitJuice_pH WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale WHWOOD Blueberry consortium Michigan State University Blueberry consortium BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 BLSHVP USDA-ARS-HCRL 9.0 attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact Blueberry consortium VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG3 15% rubs off 7.0 TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium TA Blueberry consortium ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 USDA-ARS ASTB awful 1.0 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 FRSP_FruitSplit_% Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRSP DNARATIO Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA LBR USDA-ARS-HCRL LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale Ebrahiem Babiker BLSHVE Blueberry consortium BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale GRIN-Vaccinium CAC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL VIG VIG_Vigor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL EGF EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date Blueberry consortium 6.0 50% buds destroyed 50RB Blueberry consortium 50RB_50%ReBloom_day USDA-ARS-TCHSL 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet 7.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 4.0 slightly tart but good sweetness 6.0 Blueberry consortium BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year BLSHV GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDVEPF SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count USDA-ARS-TCHSL DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g DAC Blueberry consortium 3.0 75% heterogeneous sizes 3.0 moderate resistance (45% resistant) 2.0 90% killed to the ground TOTAC Blueberry consortium TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium SWDAMP GRIN-Vaccinium SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% 4.0 60% decayed Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium FC FC_Color_0-9scale Blueberry consortium FRCL USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale MALAC MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 50B USDA-ARS-HCRL 50B_50%Bloom_day Blueberry consortium crunch 8.0 moderately vigoroug (30% will die) 7.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL TADA Blueberry consortium STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 STGW USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium CLUSTER Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 BLS USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium 6.0 light red fruit Blueberry consortium FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI FAC WINM WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium weak, 80% will die 2.0 SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIC PRR PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium STB STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 USDA-ARS USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g PEGAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% Blueberry consortium NFR 30% damage 6.0 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium ANFR ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 30% buds destroyed 8.0 SHEXP SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL FIB Blueberry consortium FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSZ Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCR FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FRROT Blueberry consortium FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI QRC QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g NEM USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 Blueberry consortium PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g PB2C North Carolina State University-PHHI USDA-ARS-TCHSL FWT2 FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g Blueberry consortium 8.0 5% rubs off GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale POLGR Blueberry consortium FSP FSP_FruitSet_% GRIN-Vaccinium BBC BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 5.0 semi firm FRFRM2 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N Blueberry consortium MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 MONO USDA-ARS-HCRL still too tart 3.0 moderatly firm 6.0 killed to the ground 1.0 Blueberry consortium SWDLPF GRIN-Vaccinium SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count vigorous (20% will die) 8.0 45% difficult to remove 5.0 Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-TCHSL PENTMEAN PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms rubs off easily 1.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL PLHGT Blueberry consortium PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm Blueberry consortium FRUCC USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 BLST Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRD FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale Blueberry consortium SS2_TotSugar_brix SS2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL BLMAG BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium 3.0 75% difficult to remove 50RP 50RP_50%Ripe_day Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL nice pop, optimal firmness 8.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g MGAC 8.0 5% damage FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm FRDIA2 Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g MGLC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVONC FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-HCRL FRAP Blueberry consortium FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 6.0 DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L DGLUCC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 ELFS USDA-ARS stocky 9.0 BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane USDA-ARS-HCRL BS2 Blueberry consortium 8.0 5% difficult to remove WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 WGR Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS YIELDACRE GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium YIELDACRE_Yield_kg Blueberry consortium FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 FRFB USDA-ARS-HCRL 30% heterogeneous sizes 6.0 FRDMG FRDMG_FrostDamage_% Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium QAC North Carolina State University-PHHI 2.0 mostly mush Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SUCC_Sucrose_g/L SUCC CRFW CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium black fruit 1.0 2-3 buds/cane 2.0 4.0 60% will die 5.0 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Blueberry consortium SS SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research 4.0 60% heterogeneous sizes MBFR MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRDIA FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale Blueberry consortium GRH USDA-ARS-HCRL GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIS SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 Blueberry consortium 6.0 30% decayed NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium NRBV moderately dense canopy 7.0 entity PB1C North Carolina State University-PHHI PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g Blueberry consortium 15% heterogeneous sizes 7.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSC Blueberry consortium FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale 1 bud/cane 1.0 SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count Blueberry consortium SDN USDA-ARS-HCRL 5.0 half having calyx (50%) MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g MGC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI maximum resistance (>80% resistant) 5.0 3.0 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS3 SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix 9.0 short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 90% decayed 2.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale CALYX Blueberry consortium 1.0 ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit high resistance (75% resistant) 4.0 high yield, optimal 8.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale FRFRM 9.0 aluminum blue fruits all decayed 1.0 short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) 8.0 PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 PC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS worst, heterogenous sizes 1.0 8.0 light blue fruits Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium FLWRSUPRGT FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count YLDW Blueberry consortium YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg USDA-ARS-TCHSL 7.0 15% willowy 2.0 90% willowy DGAC Blueberry consortium DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm PLGRC USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGLC PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium 2.0 medium-loose dark blue fruits 7.0 3.0 moderately mush COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius COLDTL USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale Blueberry consortium VIG2 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale FRCL2 FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm Ebrahiem Babiker USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRFRMMEAN USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BLSV BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 STBL STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL HVSP HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL BLODUR BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale Blueberry consortium PHENAC Blueberry consortium PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL 8.0 30% killed to the ground 2.0 long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 30% difficult to remove 6.0 1.0 difficult to remove SSP Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SSP_SolubleSolids_% 4.0 60% willowy Blueberry consortium TTT_CultivarID_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL TTT LHR Blueberry consortium LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index North Carolina State University-PHHI 2.0 mostly mush USDA-ARS-GIFVL BRF_75%Ripe_date BRF Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale FRF2 7.0 moderately loose USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium FUB_FullBloom_date FUB REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium REPEATBLM 75% willowy 3.0 ECC ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI 2.0 80% having calyx 95RP USDA-ARS-HCRL 95RP_95%Ripe_day Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL LFD Blueberry consortium LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale average density canopy 5.0 8.0 sweetness overpowering 9.0 best, homogeneous willowy 1.0 1.0 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) 7.0 30% having calyx Blueberry consortium GFRD USDA-ARS-HCRL GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 light black fruit 2.0 1.0 weak, most will die 9.0 no decay substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 5.0 9.0 stays on Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL GALL GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 light red fruit 6.0 dark red fruit 5.0 dense 1.0 6.0 moderatly firm 1.0 uniformly sized buds 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 Blueberry consortium CHAC North Carolina State University-PHHI CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g Ohio State University Blueberry consortium MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index MINSOIL 5.0 45% damage average yield 5.0 SELF_SelfFertility_% USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium SELF PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEAC Blueberry consortium 20% killed to the ground 9.0 3.0 low yield USDA-ARS-GIFVL FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g Blueberry consortium FWT 90% heterogeneous sizes 2.0 4.0 semi mush 6.0 30% willowy 5.0 semi firm 80% uniformly sized buds 2.0 2.0 very tart but sweetness 40% killed to the ground 7.0 Blueberry consortium 5RP_5%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-GIFVL 5RP FREASE Blueberry consortium FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL 4+ buds/cane 3.0 3.0 80% buds destroyed YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL YLD Blueberry consortium 9.0 extremely loose 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness 4.0 light purple fruit 75% decayed 3.0 Blueberry consortium FLBL USDA-ARS-HCRL FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% 9.0 too firm 8.0 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Blueberry consortium FRSZ2 GRIN-Vaccinium FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count 1.0 very tight 9.0 excellent 1.0 mush 6.0 moderatly firm moderately high yield 7.0 6.0 50% killed to the ground GRIN-Vaccinium BERRUPRGT BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count Blueberry consortium 9.0 no calyx between or average 2.0 Blueberry consortium FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRFRMB Blueberry consortium CC CC_Catechin_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI 15% damage 7.0 3.0 loose 5.0 average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g TAC2 1.0 no yield 4.0 60% having calyx Blueberry consortium BS BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale USDA-ARS-HCRL dark purple fruit 3.0 45% willowy 5.0 40% buds destroyed 7.0 FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FT Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 PHTB BDMT USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 5.0 60% killed to the ground 5.0 45% rubs off 1.0 all calyx very vigorous (highest survival) 9.0 3.0 75% rubs off light resistance (30% resistant) 2.0 loose (type 5) 5.0 60% buds destroyed 5.0 8.0 5% heterogeneous sizes acronym 80% killed to the ground 3.0 no damage 10.0 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland PF_PetalFall_date PF 3.0 moderately mush weak 1.0 too firm 9.0 very easy to remove 9.0 PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g PAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 4.0 60% damage 15% decayed 7.0 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium TAC TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g 8.0 20% having calyx dark blue fruits 7.0 SS5 Blueberry consortium SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix USDA-ARS-GIFVL attribute TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL USDA-ARS-HCRL TA2 Blueberry consortium all buds destroyed on bush 1.0 6.0 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 weak, 70% will die 1.0 large, deep, torn skin, wet GRIN-Vaccinium SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index SWDRI Blueberry consortium 1.0 lots of damage above average dense canopy 6.0 90% damage 2.0 no damage 9.0 5.0 dark red fruit 3.0 moderately soft 60% rubs off 4.0 2.0 moderately loose canopy loose (type 6) 6.0 8.0 5% decayed 2.0 very low yield 4.0 semi soft semi-loose canopy 3.0 3.0 moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 1.0 very soft 8.0 mostly loose 70% having calyx 3.0 light purple fruit 4.0 4.0 semi-loose loose canopy 4.0 mush 1.0 6.0 30% rubs off 5.0 45% heterogeneous sizes black fruit 1.0 less dense canopy 1.0 Blueberry ontology vigorous 3.0 mostly soft 2.0 BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale Blueberry consortium BLOOM USDA-ARS-GIFVL 75% damage 3.0 2.0 Medium 5.0 45% decayed 60% difficult to remove 4.0 2.0 light black fruit 3.0 Highest 4.0 slight too tart but acceptable 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 2.0 8.0 dense canopy 8.0 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet balanced tartness and sweetness 5.0 dark purple fruit 3.0 moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) 6.0 7.0 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 4.0 semi mush 9.0 aluminum blue fruits 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet 2.0 3.0 moderately tight 90% buds destroyed 2.0 7.0 short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) 9.0 overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking 2.0 90% rubs off 8.0 light blue fruits mostly firm 7.0 0-3 scale sucrose content Sucrose content Fruit Fruit sucrose content Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January Plant leaf to bloom ratio Plant leaf to bloom ratio SWD antibiosis Fruit SWD antibiosis Fruit SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit BLSHV sensitivity ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant BLSHV sensitivity Plant buds/cane Bud cold damage The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) Bud cold damage 1-9 scale leaf density Number of buds per cane bud set Plant Plant bud set Development time in years Observed color of blooms Color of flowers recorded using available list 1-9 scale fruit texture upright berries Plant Numer of upright berries Plant upright berries Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus Plant ring blotch Plant ring blotch Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin rutinoside content Number of days to 50% ripe 50% ripe Plant Plant 50% ripe Root Root white grubs white grubs Susceptibility to white grubs Syringetin 3-glucoside content syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit Fruit flavor Fruit Rating of the fruit flavor flavor Malvidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Percent of fruit that split from water Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding 1-3 scale cluster tightness Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer Fruit Fruit total phenolics content total phenolics content cm2 color Color of leaves in fall Leaf color Leaf Flower self-fertility Self-fertility of cultivar Flower self-fertility pH of fruit juice Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) 0/1 Fruit Fruit Juice titratable acidity Titratable acidity of juice Juice titratable acidity Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavanol content mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Visual observation of phytophthora root rot Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Visual observation of nematodes Plant fruit set Plant fruit set Percent fruit set height x width measurement cm2 Computation of bush size based on height and width in January Susceptibility to plum curculio plum curculio Fruit Fruit plum curculio Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Ferulic acid content Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. Amount of winter damage on scale Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Fruit color Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit color Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Malic acid content 1-9 scale fruit ease of release Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch Leaf bacterial scorch Leaf bacterial scorch Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated procyanidin-B2 content Fruit Procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Fruit total acid content Total acid content Fruit total acid content Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Flower Flower petal fall petal fall Timing of petal fall lesion size Fungal lesion size Stem Stem lesion size Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm percent Fruit Phenolic acid content phenolic acid Fruit phenolic acid Bud Susceptibility to gall midge Bud gall midge gall midge Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. 1-9 scale growth habit kg Fruit catechin Catechin content Fruit catechin Leaf leafhoper leafhoper Leaf Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper Bud Chill units for 50% budbreak Bud chilling requirement chilling requirement Plant Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe first ripe Plant first ripe Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Days to 5% ripe mg/100 g Fruit Fruit SWD oviposition success index count SWD oviposition success index count SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale Fruit Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit ease of release ease of release Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant Fruit 1-9 scale fruit yield Fruit Fruit diameter diameter Average diameter of fruit Fruit Fruit SWD adult mortality SWD adult mortality SWD adult mortality percent Fruit soluble solids Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids Fruit soluble solids g/mm Fruit alternaria rot Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot alternaria rot Fruit Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Average weight of 25 fruits Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January Leaf to bloom ratio hours Fruit Fruit ferulic acid Ferulic acid content ferulic acid Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content Fruit quercetin arabinoside content quercetin arabinoside content Fruit 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax Plant aphids aphids Susceptibility to aphids Plant Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample Average diameter of 20 fruits ms Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Plant Plant mineral soil adaptation index mineral soil adaptation index Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Visual rating of cluster tightness Fruit picking scar Fruit picking scar Size rating of picking scar on fruit 50% re-bloom Plant 50% re-bloom Number of days to 50% re-bloom Plant grams Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Average time needed to penetrate fruits Stem monopodial Stem monopodial Monopodial growth habit Delphinidin galactoside content Fruit Fruit delphinidin galactoside delphinidin galactoside Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Visual rating of plant vigor Average diameter of 30 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. count cyanidin arabinoside Fruit Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Cyanidin arabinoside content Percent of rotted fruit Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. petunidin galactoside content Fruit Fruit petunidin galactoside content Petunidin galactoside content Malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content Plant stinkbug Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug stinkbug Plant Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off Malvidin glucoside content Fruit malvidin glucoside content Fruit malvidin glucoside content flavor, 1-9 scale Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Fruit Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit quercetin galactoside content Fruit quercetin galactoside content Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe Percent of shoots with blight Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight DNA/stdDNA Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot Root Root phytophthora rot phytophthora rot green fruit drop Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening Fruit green fruit drop Fruit Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Cyanidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Catechin content Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Fruit storage decay Fruit Amount of fruit decay after storage storage decay Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Fruit Flavonol content 1-9 scale fruit picking scar Size of bush in January bush size Plant bush size Plant date Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH Percent of fruit rot Fruit rot rot Fruit Fruit Fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content D-glucose content Fruit splitting after wetting Percent of fruit that split after setting in water splitting after wetting Fruit Number of upright flowers on the plant measured Number of upright flowers 0-10 scale winter damage Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus Plant scorch virus Plant scorch virus Flavanol content Fruit flavanol content flavanol content Fruit cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits Fruit cluster tightness Fruit Fruit late green Timing of late green fruit late green Fruit crispness Fruit crispness Fruit Texture of fruit Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Visual observation of scale insects Percent soluble solids Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer BLSHV presence Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest Plant BLSHV presence Plant Number of seeds per fruit Average number of seeds per fruit Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance Leaf rust resistance Leaf rust resistance Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation Visual observation of insect presence Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin galactoside content Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant BLSHV symptoms development time BLSHV symptoms development time Plant Plant growth and yield due to soil A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Percent of fruit rot Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured 1-9 scale fruit appearance Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size Bud size Bud size Firmness of fruit measurement Fruit firmness, measured firmness, measured Fruit mg/L yield Plant yield Plant Plant yield Uniformity of bud size Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit Measurement of bud set Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Fruit petunidin arabinoside content Petunidin arabinoside content Fruit petunidin arabinoside content Visual observation of white grubs Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Peonidin glucoside content peonidin glucoside Fruit Fruit peonidin glucoside order of leaf and bloom emergence Malvidin arabinoside content malvidin arabinoside content Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Fruit Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Total acid content Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Visual observation of plum curculio density Leaf density Density of leaves in plant canopy Leaf 1-9 scale fruit decay Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number Measurement of pollen germination rate pH of juice from fruit Fruit pH pH Fruit Reaction to leaf rust Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. 1-9 scale fruit crispness Plant width measured in centimeters Plant width width Plant germination rate Pollen germination rate Pollen Pollen germination rate Fruit number per cup Fruit number per cup Number of berries per cup Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Percent of dead buds from frost damage 1-9 scale uniform ripening Plant repeat bloom Plant repeat bloom Percent repeat bloom Plant stunt Plant Susceptibility to blueberry stunt stunt Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Glucose content Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility Fruit Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot mummy berry rot susceptibility Kaempferol glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit maggot Fruit Susceptibility to blueberry maggot maggot glucose content Fruit Fruit glucose content Glucose content Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Number of days to 95% ripe 95% ripe Plant 95% ripe Plant D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. D-glucose content Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Phenolic acid content Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm pollination rate Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations Flower Flower pollination rate Caffeic acid content Fruit caffeic acid Fruit caffeic acid Durability of bloom Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched 1-5 bud size scale Fruit rot presence or absence Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. variable_of cyanidin galactoside Fruit cyanidin galactoside Cyanidin galactoside content Fruit Survey of fruit texture on a scale Rating of mature fruit texture Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B1 content If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin arabinoside content Attractiveness of fruit appearance appearance Fruit Fruit appearance Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt Visual observation of blueberry stunt Fruit total anthocyanin content total anthocyanin content Fruit Total anthocyanin in fruit Fruit firmness, scale Fruit Firmness of fruit estimation firmness, scale Citric acid content Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Fruit cranberry worm Fruit cranberry worm Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm Fruit SWD resistance index SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin arabinoside content 0-10 index Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Fruit quercetin rutinoside content Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Quercetin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit UV damage Amount of UV damage on fruit Fruit UV damage Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. Stem lesion size g/100 mL Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer height x width measurement cm2 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Malvidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Plant height measured in centimeters height Plant height Plant bloom amount Fruit bloom amount Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit 0-5Index Susceptibility to algal stem blotch Stem Stem algal blotch algal blotch Plant leafhopper resistance Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis leafhopper resistance Plant Plant exobasidium spot Plant exobasidium spot Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Fruit color after wax removal Fruit color - wax removed Fruit color - wax removed Fruit Uniform ripening Fruit uniform ripening uniform ripening Fruit Fruit size rated on a scale size Fruit size Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Chlorogenic acid content Fruit Fruit bloom durability bloom durability The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Rating of picking scar Visual rating of picking scar on fruit Characteristic of fruit when bite into Rating of fruit crispness/texture Plant fruit number Plant fruit number Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Susceptibility to stem canker canker Stem Stem canker Yield per acre as measured Measurement of yield per acre Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker Fruit blue/ripe Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit Fruit blue/ripe Fruit fructose content fructose content Fructose content Fruit Cyanidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Susceptibility to flower thrips thrips Flower Flower thrips Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. Chill unit measurement temperature in celsius Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). Flavonol content Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. growth index delphinidin glucoside Fruit delphinidin glucoside Fruit Delphinidin glucoside content Susceptibility to stem gall wasp Stem Stem gall wasp gall wasp Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) 0-9 scale fruit flavor Plant first bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Plant first bloom Bud winter moth Susceptibility to winter moth Bud winter moth Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin arabinoside content 1-9 scale Days to 95% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe Percent of dead flowers Percent of flowers which have died due to disease malic acid content Malic acid content Fruit Fruit malic acid content days Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Percent of dead buds due to winter damage Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Fruit firmness retention-bush Fruit firmness retention-bush Retention of fruit firmness while on bush Measurement of yield per plant Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype Fruit seed count Average seed count per fruit Fruit seed count Visual observation of aphids Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Presence of calyx at time of harvest Fruit calyx on/off calyx on/off Fruit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Myricetin glucoside content Stem phomopsis blight phomopsis blight Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight Stem Visual rating of plant growth habit Rating of plant growth habit Fruit Peonidin galactoside content peonidin galactoside Fruit peonidin galactoside Days to 50% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 Visual rating of plant vigor brix Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Fruit Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index scale SWD resistance, oviposition success index count Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds Bud Bud frost damage frost damage cm Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Epi-catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 1-9 scale fruit UV damange Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Bud mite Susceptibility to bud mite Bud mite Plant Plant 5% ripe Number of days to 5% ripe 5% ripe Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). Flower Color of flowers Flower color flower color winter damage Stem winter damage Measurement of damage from winter weather Stem Retention of fruit flavor while on bush flavor-bush Fruit Fruit flavor-bush Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Delphinidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual rating of fruit appearance Rating of fruit appearance Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Amount of UV damage Visual rating of UV damage on fruit Procyanidin-B2 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 0-1 color scale chlorogenic acid Fruit Fruit chlorogenic acid Chlorogenic acid content Texture of mature fruit texture Fruit texture Fruit early green Fruit Fruit early green Timing of early green fruit Fruit Fruit anthracnose rot anthracnose rot Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Brix reading from fruit sample Measured from juice from a berry sample Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) 0-9 color scale 1-9 scale fruit flavor Count of number of berries per cup Count of numer of berries per cup Measurement of plant growth upright Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Peonidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Numer of upright flowers upright flowers Plant upright flowers Plant penetration time Fruit penetration time Time elapsed for pentration Fruit myricetin glucoside Fruit myricetin glucoside Myricetin 3-glucoside content Fruit Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Amount of winter damage on stem mg/100 g of fresh weight Measurement of damage from winter weather Bud winter hardiness winter hardiness Bud method_of Flower blight death Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas Flower blight death g/L 1-9 scale fruit color Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers Plant true to type Plant true to type Visual observation of algal stem blotch Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch Brix reading from 20 fruit Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Fruit average fruit firmness, measured Fruit average fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer Petunidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin glucoside content Fruit kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content kaempferol glucoside Fruit Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Days to 50% bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom 1-9 scale fruit size borers Stem Susceptibility to stem borers Stem borers Number of days to 50% bloom Plant Plant 50% bloom 50% bloom Plant DNA ratio Plant Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant DNA ratio 1-3 scale Percent of repeat bloom Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin glucoside content Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Visual observation of stem gall wasp Visual observation of exobasidium spot Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Fruit cherry worm Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm cherry worm Fruit Rating of calyx presence Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Plant growth habit Plant growth habit Rating of fruit firmness Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Rating of yield on a scale Visual rating of fruit yield Total phenolics content Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Plant vigor Plant vigor Plant vigor Fruit Fruit peonidin arabinoside Peonidin arabinoside content peonidin arabinoside Fruit petunidin glucoside content Petunidin glucoside content Fruit petunidin glucoside content Effectiveness of self-pollination Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Caffeic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual rating of overall fruit size Rating of fruit size Percent fruit set Percent of fruit set on the plant measured Fruit epi-catechin Fruit epi-catechin Epi-catechin content Delphinidin arabinoside content Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Visual observation of stem borers Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers Fruit Fruit weight weight Average weight of fruit Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom Days to 50% re-bloom cyanidin glucoside Fruit cyanidin glucoside Fruit Cyanidin glucoside content Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January Measurement of plant height 1-10 scale winter hardiness 1-9 scale cluster tightness Amount of bloom Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Sucrose content Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations N 1-5 index 1-3 scale pollen germination rate mg/mL scale_of Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Number of upright berries Percent of fruit with rot Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Visual rating of cluster tightness Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 pH Rating of fruit decay after storage Visual rating of fruit decay Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) Plant full bloom full bloom Plant procyanidin-B1 content Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Fruit Procyanidin-B1 content Stem scale insects scale insects Susceptibility to scale insects Stem Plant blight-canker Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker Plant blight-canker Measurement of plant width in centimeters Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January citric acid content Fruit citric acid content Fruit Citric acid content Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Average weight of 30 fruits Shoot Timing of shoot expansion expansion Shoot expansion Fruit total sugar content Fruit total sugar content Total sugar content 1-9 scale calyx Susceptibility to nematodes Root nematodes Root nematodes mm Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Blueberry Shock Virus presence Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Observed color of leaves in autumn Color of leaves during autumn weather Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Visual observation of disease presence Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) Total sugar content measured in Brix Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin galactoside content Malvidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of stem canker Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker 1-9 scale fruit firmness 1-9 scale plant vigor Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Visual observation of thrips Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set Fructose content Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Color of fruit Visual survey of fruit color 1-3 scale plant vigor