Blueberry consortium BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research BUDSZ YIELDACRE_Yield_kg Blueberry consortium YIELDACRE GRIN-Vaccinium CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CITAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL SS5 SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix 8.0 5% decayed 7.0 short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) dense canopy 8.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRD FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale 3.0 low yield ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 ALFR Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 5.0 semi firm GRIN-Vaccinium FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count Blueberry consortium FRSZ2 SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix SS Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS ANFR QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium QGC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 FLTH SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDRI PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g PGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium rubs off easily 1.0 TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research TA 45% rubs off 5.0 2.0 90% killed to the ground Blueberry consortium EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL EGF MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL MAC Blueberry consortium 5RP_5%Ripe_day Blueberry consortium 5RP USDA-ARS-GIFVL ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium ASTB CLUSTER Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 95RP_95%Ripe_day 95RP 1.0 all calyx FUB_FullBloom_date Blueberry consortium FUB USDA-ARS-GIFVL 2.0 mostly mush USDA-ARS-TCHSL SUCC_Sucrose_g/L Blueberry consortium SUCC GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 GALL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 30% rubs off 6.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL CALYX CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale LBR USDA-ARS-HCRL Ebrahiem Babiker LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL HVSP HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm FRDIA above average yield 6.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g Blueberry consortium CAC moderatly firm 6.0 SWD SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 GFRD 1.0 long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) FC Blueberry consortium FC_Color_0-9scale GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGAC MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA DNARATIO TA2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL GRH Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale PLGRC PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium GRIN-Vaccinium BERRUPRGT Blueberry consortium BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count FT FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium DGAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g Blueberry consortium MGC MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL NFR 80% buds destroyed 3.0 FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRF Jeannie Rowland MBBL Blueberry consortium MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FLAVANC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g 6.0 above average dense canopy 75% difficult to remove 3.0 TAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 Blueberry consortium FRFB USDA-ARS-HCRL 1.0 large, deep, torn skin, wet light black fruit 2.0 YLDW USDA-ARS-TCHSL YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg Blueberry consortium 90% rubs off 2.0 Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count SWDLPF REPEATBLM Blueberry consortium REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% GRIN-Vaccinium USDA-ARS-TCHSL DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g DGLC Blueberry consortium BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 BLSV Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms USDA-ARS-TCHSL PENTMEAN Ebrahiem Babiker LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL LRR SCALE SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 90% buds destroyed 2.0 50RP 50RP_50%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 8.0 30% buds destroyed 5.0 45% difficult to remove SELF_SelfFertility_% SELF Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL no damage 10.0 2.0 mostly tight 5.0 half having calyx (50%) STCA Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 USDA-ARS ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 ELFS Blueberry consortium FRDMG_FrostDamage_% FRDMG Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g CYGAC Blueberry consortium PEAC PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 50RB 50RB_50%ReBloom_day Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL BLMAG Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm PLHGT Blueberry consortium BRF BRF_75%Ripe_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 STGW Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS CYAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g 5.0 average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) North Carolina State University-PHHI QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium QRC 5.0 dark red fruit above average vigorous (40% will die) 6.0 50% buds destroyed 6.0 FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale FRUV Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 3.0 loose CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS CRFW Blueberry consortium LGF_LateGreenFruit_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL LGF Blueberry consortium CFW USDA-ARS CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g MGLC FRSZ FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 5.0 45% willowy 30% damage 6.0 loose (type 5) 5.0 6.0 light red fruit Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale BLODUR Ohio State University MINSOIL MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL POLR POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% 50% killed to the ground 6.0 5.0 balanced tartness and sweetness SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIC WINM WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS FRCL2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FREASE USDA-ARS-HCRL FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale 6.0 moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm STBL USDA-ARS PC PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FRSP_FruitSplit_% USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRSP Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL TTT_CultivarID_0/1 TTT CHAC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL MONO less dense canopy 1.0 1.0 uniformly sized buds CC North Carolina State University-PHHI CC_Catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium FAC North Carolina State University-PHHI FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale WHWOOD Blueberry consortium Michigan State University Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PEGLC PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g 2.0 80% having calyx 7.0 moderately dense canopy vigorous (20% will die) 8.0 BS2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count SWDRR Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium 7.0 mostly firm Blueberry consortium FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FRROT Blueberry consortium PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI PB2C Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 WGR Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL WHBUD WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g PHENAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRFRMB FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL light purple fruit 4.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm Ebrahiem Babiker FRDIA2 weak 1.0 ECC North Carolina State University-PHHI ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium SWDAMP GRIN-Vaccinium SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% USDA-ARS-HCRL YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale YLD Blueberry consortium LHR North Carolina State University-PHHI LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index Blueberry consortium 1.0 ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL CLUSTER2 CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale 90% damage 2.0 SWDOSIS Blueberry consortium SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 GRIN-Vaccinium 3.0 Highest dark blue fruits 7.0 BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale BLOOM USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium 2.0 between or average FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date FRP Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG2 Blueberry consortium VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale USDA-ARS-HCRL BMS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium MALAC MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count Blueberry consortium SWDVEPF GRIN-Vaccinium 50% uniformly sized buds 3.0 FRFRMMEAN USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm Ebrahiem Babiker Blueberry consortium GLUCC USDA-ARS GLUCC_Glucose_g/L DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L DGLUCC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 5.0 45% heterogeneous sizes GRIN-Vaccinium FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count FLWRSUPRGT Blueberry consortium 4.0 light purple fruit 2-3 buds/cane 2.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL VIG_Vigor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium VIG PFRROT PFRROT_FruitRot_% Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium 8.0 sweetness overpowering APH_SusToAphids_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS APH POLGR Blueberry consortium POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale GRIN-Vaccinium DAC Blueberry consortium DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL 40% having calyx 6.0 1.0 minimal resistance (15% resistant) too firm 9.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRPH_FruitJuice_pH FRPH 7.0 15% damage Blueberry consortium KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI KGC Blueberry consortium NEM NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 USDA-ARS no calyx 9.0 small, dry 9.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS3 Blueberry consortium SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix mostly loose 8.0 PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PAC 1.0 very tight 4.0 moderately low yiedld BLSHV Blueberry consortium BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year GRIN-Vaccinium 3.0 vigorous 60% buds destroyed 5.0 long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 2.0 9.0 aluminum blue fruits SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL SHEXP PF_PetalFall_date Jeannie Rowland PF USDA-ARS-GIFVL 9.0 20% killed to the ground 20% uniformly sized buds 4.0 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 7.0 BLS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 8.0 high yield, optimal SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL SDN USDA-ARS-TCHSL TPC TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L Blueberry consortium FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCR FRAP FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL USDA-ARS-TCHSL TADA TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL Blueberry consortium FRCL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale 60% will die 4.0 slight too tart but acceptable 4.0 3.0 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 9.0 excellent 30% willowy 6.0 FRFRM FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g Blueberry consortium PB1C North Carolina State University-PHHI TOTAC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L 8.0 5% heterogeneous sizes 75% heterogeneous sizes 3.0 FLBL FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL 4.0 semi-loose USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PEGAC PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g aluminum blue fruits 9.0 90% willowy 2.0 8.0 30% killed to the ground PHTB Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 5% damage 8.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 SNL TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL TA3 3.0 weak, 70% will die 7.0 moderately vigoroug (30% will die) BSZ Blueberry consortium BSZ_BushSize_cm2 USDA-ARS-HCRL 40% killed to the ground 7.0 5.0 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 20% having calyx 8.0 STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS STB no yield 1.0 9.0 too firm AGC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet 8.0 3.0 75% damage 9.0 very easy to remove 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 3.0 6.0 light red fruit 3.0 moderate resistance (45% resistant) MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% MBFR Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium 90% difficult to remove 2.0 9.0 no decay 2.0 light resistance (30% resistant) entity 5.0 semi firm LFD LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRSC FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL semi mush 4.0 SS2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS2_TotSugar_brix awful 1.0 PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 PRR Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 3.0 75% rubs off overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking 9.0 7.0 30% having calyx 9.0 attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact 70% buds destroyed 4.0 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet 7.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale FRF2 Blueberry consortium BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 Blueberry consortium BBC USDA-ARS 1.0 all decayed GRIN-Vaccinium FSP FSP_FruitSet_% Blueberry consortium 7.0 15% willowy weak, most will die 1.0 50B Blueberry consortium 50B_50%Bloom_day USDA-ARS-HCRL 15% heterogeneous sizes 7.0 5.0 semi firm semi mush 4.0 3.0 still too tart PLWTH Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm 60% decayed 4.0 20% buds destroyed 9.0 5.0 maximum resistance (>80% resistant) BLST BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS 3.0 moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale Blueberry consortium BS USDA-ARS-HCRL 5.0 60% killed to the ground USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CYGLC CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g FRFRM2 USDA-ARS-GIFVL FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N Jeannie Rowland 80% uniformly sized buds 2.0 60% difficult to remove 4.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL BLSHVP BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 VIG3 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 slightly tart but sweetness overpowering 7.0 Blueberry ontology FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g FWT2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 3.0 dark purple fruit above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 4.0 dense 1.0 COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius COLDTL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium SSP_SolubleSolids_% GRIN-Vaccinium SSP 5.0 average vigorous, 50% will die loose (type 6) 6.0 6.0 30% difficult to remove 3.0 80% killed to the ground CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour Blueberry consortium CR USDA-ARS-GIFVL substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 5.0 PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGLC 8.0 crunch 1.0 mush acronym mostly soft 2.0 LC GRIN-Vaccinium LC_Color_0-1scale Blueberry consortium 2.0 Medium 7.0 mostly firm moderatly firm 6.0 Blueberry consortium NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 USDA-ARS NRBV FRUCC FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g FWT Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL 8.0 light blue fruits 30% heterogeneous sizes 6.0 moderately mush 3.0 6.0 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g FLAVONC Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL BDMT BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS dark blue fruits 7.0 40% buds destroyed 7.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date FIB very soft 1.0 1 bud/cane 1.0 15% decayed 7.0 BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale Blueberry consortium BLSHVE GRIN-Vaccinium 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 6.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 4.0 9.0 stocky 3.0 75% willowy short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 9.0 Lowest 1.0 lots of damage 1.0 90% decayed 2.0 5.0 45% damage Blueberry consortium QAC QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI very firm 9.0 7.0 15% rubs off very tart but sweetness 2.0 5.0 45% decayed 6.0 moderatly firm TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g TAC2 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL 1.0 all buds destroyed on bush 6.0 30% decayed 4.0 loose canopy willowy 1.0 2.0 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 10.0 no damage very vigorous (highest survival) 9.0 8.0 short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) 4.0 60% rubs off 3.0 4+ buds/cane average density canopy 5.0 60% heterogeneous sizes 4.0 7.0 mostly firm 1.0 difficult to remove no damage 9.0 8.0 5% difficult to remove dark purple fruit 3.0 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 5.0 5.0 dark red fruit 1.0 black fruit 15% difficult to remove 7.0 7.0 moderately high yield 3.0 moderately tight moderately loose 7.0 4.0 high resistance (75% resistant) attribute 8.0 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness extremely loose 9.0 3.0 moderately mush black fruit 1.0 slightly tart but good sweetness 6.0 8.0 5% willowy 75% decayed 3.0 best, homogeneous 9.0 4.0 60% having calyx 2.0 light black fruit average yield 5.0 4.0 60% damage semi soft 4.0 moderately loose canopy 2.0 stays on 9.0 3.0 semi-loose canopy 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness 5% rubs off 8.0 2.0 90% heterogeneous sizes 8.0 light blue fruits 4.0 60% willowy 2.0 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet weak, 80% will die 2.0 2.0 medium-loose mush 1.0 3.0 70% having calyx 2.0 very low yield very dense canopy 9.0 1.0 worst, heterogenous sizes 2.0 mostly mush moderately soft 3.0 killed to the ground 1.0 70% killed to the ground 4.0 1-9 scale cluster tightness 1-3 scale plant vigor Fruit total acid content Fruit total acid content Total acid content Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched Durability of bloom Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. 1-9 scale fruit flavor Percent of repeat bloom Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured Percent of fruit with rot Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype Measurement of yield per plant 1-5 index Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Stem Stem winter damage winter damage Measurement of damage from winter weather Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January leaf to bloom ratio Plant Plant leaf to bloom ratio Shoot Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 1-9 scale fruit appearance Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) Plant full bloom Plant full bloom mm Fruit delphinidin galactoside Fruit delphinidin galactoside Delphinidin galactoside content Bud winter hardiness Bud winter hardiness Measurement of damage from winter weather average fruit firmness, measured Fruit average fruit firmness, measured Fruit Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Fruit Fruit appearance Attractiveness of fruit appearance appearance grams 1-9 scale fruit firmness SWD viable eggs per fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Rating of bud set Visual count of the number of buds per cane mg/100 g One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale Visual rating of UV damage on fruit Amount of UV damage Measurement of yield per acre Yield per acre as measured Plant DNA ratio Plant DNA ratio Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Stem gall wasp Stem Susceptibility to stem gall wasp gall wasp phytophthora rot Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot Root Root phytophthora rot 1-9 scale fruit UV damange Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Fruit catechin Catechin content Fruit catechin peonidin galactoside Fruit peonidin galactoside Peonidin galactoside content Fruit Brix reading from fruit sample Measured from juice from a berry sample fruit number Plant fruit number Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Plant Stem scale insects Stem Susceptibility to scale insects scale insects Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Fruit texture Texture of mature fruit Fruit texture Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin galactoside content Number of berries per cup Fruit number per cup number per cup Fruit Size rating of picking scar on fruit picking scar Fruit Fruit picking scar Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate date Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit Visual observation of disease presence Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Visual observation of stem borers Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers Fruit blue/ripe Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit Fruit blue/ripe Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) 0/1 Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit flavor Fruit flavor cherry worm Fruit Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm Fruit cherry worm Bud frost damage frost damage Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds Bud Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer percent Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm Susceptibility to winter moth Bud Bud winter moth winter moth Susceptibility to white grubs Root Root white grubs white grubs Susceptibility to bud mite Bud mite mite Bud Susceptibility to stem borers Stem borers Stem borers Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Visual observation of phytophthora root rot Number of days to 95% ripe 95% ripe Plant Plant 95% ripe Timing of early green fruit Fruit early green Fruit early green pH of fruit juice Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker Fruit crispness crispness Fruit Texture of fruit Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer Fruit total phenolics content Fruit total phenolics content Fruit cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits Fruit quercetin rutinoside content quercetin rutinoside content Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Fruit first ripe Plant first ripe Plant Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Visual observation of nematodes Visual rating of overall fruit size Rating of fruit size days Fruit UV damage Fruit UV damage Amount of UV damage on fruit Retention of fruit firmness while on bush Fruit Fruit firmness retention-bush firmness retention-bush Fruit delphinidin glucoside Fruit delphinidin glucoside Delphinidin glucoside content Days to 95% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content Fruit kaempferol glucoside Fruit 1-9 scale uniform ripening Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Blueberry Shock Virus presence Petunidin arabinoside content Fruit Fruit petunidin arabinoside content petunidin arabinoside content Fruit Average weight of fruit weight Fruit weight Fruit malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content Malvidin galactoside content Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer height x width measurement cm2 Peonidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant ease of release Fruit ease of release Malvidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight malic acid content Fruit Fruit malic acid content Malic acid content rust resistance Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation Leaf rust resistance Leaf Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index count Fruit SWD oviposition success index count density Leaf Density of leaves in plant canopy Leaf density 1-9 scale leaf density mg/mL Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Fruit malvidin arabinoside content Malvidin arabinoside content Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Days to 50% bloom Plant true to type Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers Plant true to type Plant Plant upright berries upright berries Numer of upright berries hours brix count Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size Bud size size Bud D-glucose content Fruit D-glucose content Fruit D-glucose content Plant BLSHV symptoms development time Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant BLSHV symptoms development time Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility mummy berry rot susceptibility Fruit Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot Bud gall midge Susceptibility to gall midge Bud gall midge Fruit Juice titratable acidity Juice titratable acidity Fruit Titratable acidity of juice Fruit Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids Fruit soluble solids soluble solids Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flavonol content total anthocyanin content Fruit total anthocyanin content Total anthocyanin in fruit Fruit Flavanol content Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. DNA/stdDNA Stem monopodial Stem monopodial Monopodial growth habit Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Plant exobasidium spot Plant exobasidium spot Shoot Timing of shoot expansion Shoot expansion expansion Color of leaves during autumn weather Observed color of leaves in autumn 1-9 scale Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Rating of fruit firmness Plant Susceptibility to aphids aphids Plant aphids 1-9 scale fruit picking scar Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B2 content Fruit glucose content Glucose content Fruit glucose content Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch Leaf bacterial scorch Leaf bacterial scorch blight-canker Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker Plant Plant blight-canker Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. phomopsis blight Stem phomopsis blight Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight Stem Color of flowers Flower color flower color Flower Fruit peonidin arabinoside Fruit Peonidin arabinoside content peonidin arabinoside Plant Plant scorch virus scorch virus Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus Plant Plant stinkbug stinkbug Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug Fruit Citric acid content citric acid content Fruit citric acid content Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Rating of calyx presence Visual observation of plum curculio Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Total sugar content measured in Brix Average diameter of 30 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. 0-5Index Fruit firmness, scale firmness, scale Fruit Firmness of fruit estimation buds/cane Computation of bush size based on height and width in January height x width measurement cm2 D-glucose content D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Flower blight death Flower Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas blight death Cyanidin galactoside content Fruit cyanidin galactoside Fruit cyanidin galactoside Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. Amount of winter damage on scale Percent of shoots with blight Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Fructose content Fruit fructose content Fruit fructose content Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Development time in years pollination rate Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations Flower Flower pollination rate Plant bud set bud set Plant Number of buds per cane Peonidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch Visual observation of algal stem blotch Percent fruit set Plant Plant fruit set fruit set Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Amount of winter damage on stem Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Visual observation of thrips SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Average time needed to penetrate fruits Visual observation of white grubs Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Measurement of plant height Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January Cyanidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). 0-9 scale fruit flavor Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations 1-9 scale fruit yield ring blotch Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus Plant Plant ring blotch Fruit malvidin glucoside content Fruit malvidin glucoside content Malvidin glucoside content Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Total phenolics content 1-9 scale fruit color Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Stem lesion size Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. 1-9 scale fruit texture cranberry worm Fruit cranberry worm Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm Fruit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin arabinoside content cm diameter Fruit Average diameter of fruit Fruit diameter mg/L Visual observation of insect presence Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Retention of fruit flavor while on bush Fruit flavor-bush Fruit flavor-bush pH Fruit pH pH of juice from fruit Fruit pH Fruit seed count Average seed count per fruit Fruit seed count g/L 1-9 scale fruit ease of release Plant Size of bush in January bush size Plant bush size Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Visual rating of plant vigor Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Visual observation of scale insects Fruit petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content Petunidin galactoside content Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Plant Plant mineral soil adaptation index mineral soil adaptation index Cyanidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight uniform ripening Fruit uniform ripening Uniform ripening Fruit Fruit Fruit peonidin glucoside Peonidin glucoside content peonidin glucoside Citric acid content Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) kg Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight total sugar content Fruit Fruit total sugar content Total sugar content Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Fruit penetration time penetration time Fruit Time elapsed for pentration Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Amount of bloom Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Measurement of plant growth upright variable_of mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Visual survey of fruit color Color of fruit Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Brix reading from 20 fruit flavonol content Flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Fruit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Quercetin galactoside content ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant BLSHV sensitivity Plant BLSHV sensitivity Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Phenolic acid content Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Fruit Fruit myricetin glucoside myricetin glucoside Myricetin 3-glucoside content Percent of dead flowers Percent of flowers which have died due to disease Chlorogenic acid content chlorogenic acid Fruit Fruit chlorogenic acid Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 Visual rating of plant vigor splitting after wetting Fruit Percent of fruit that split after setting in water Fruit splitting after wetting Fruit Syringetin 3-glucoside content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content syrengitin 3-glucoside content Plant first bloom Plant Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) first bloom Ferulic acid content ferulic acid Fruit ferulic acid Fruit growth index scale_of 1-3 scale Effectiveness of self-pollination Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight growth habit Plant Plant growth habit Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Visual rating of cluster tightness Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). stunt Susceptibility to blueberry stunt Plant stunt Plant Fruit SWD reproductive rate SWD reproductive rate Fruit SWD reproductive rate Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Fruit size rated on a scale Fruit size Fruit size Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. Number of days to 50% bloom Plant 50% bloom 50% bloom Plant Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Ferulic acid content Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit bloom amount Fruit Fruit bloom amount Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample Average diameter of 20 fruits Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Plant repeat bloom Plant Percent repeat bloom repeat bloom Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale SWD resistance, oviposition success index count Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening Fruit Fruit green fruit drop green fruit drop Stem algal blotch Stem Susceptibility to algal stem blotch algal blotch Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Visual rating of fruit appearance Rating of fruit appearance Visual rating of picking scar on fruit Rating of picking scar Epi-catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Average weight of 25 fruits Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper 1-5 bud size scale Measurement of bud set Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes Rating of fruit crispness/texture Characteristic of fruit when bite into order of leaf and bloom emergence Percent of fruit rot Fruit rot rot Fruit Bud Bud cold damage The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) cold damage Petunidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Percent of fruit rot Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured Leaf color Color of leaves in fall Leaf color 0-10 scale winter damage Plant upright flowers Plant upright flowers Numer of upright flowers Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January Leaf to bloom ratio Procyanidin-B1 content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Days to 50% ripe Fruit Fruit phenolic acid phenolic acid Phenolic acid content Rating of mature fruit texture Survey of fruit texture on a scale petunidin glucoside content Petunidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit petunidin glucoside content 0-3 scale Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Myricetin glucoside content Malic acid content Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January Measurement of plant width in centimeters Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Glucose content mg/100 g of fresh weight Visual observation of blueberry stunt Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt Percent of fruit that split from water Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Rating of fruit decay after storage Visual rating of fruit decay canker Stem Susceptibility to stem canker Stem canker Days to 50% re-bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom Delphinidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight 0-10 index Fruit maggot Fruit maggot Susceptibility to blueberry maggot N plum curculio Fruit plum curculio Susceptibility to plum curculio Fruit Amount of fruit decay after storage storage decay Fruit Fruit storage decay Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Average weight of 30 fruits Visual observation of stem gall wasp Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin galactoside content Procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Percent of rotted fruit Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. Procyanidin-B1 content Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Plant Plant 50% ripe Number of days to 50% ripe 50% ripe flavanol content Fruit flavanol content Flavanol content Fruit Sucrose content Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Fruit SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit SWD antibiosis Fruit SWD antibiosis ms Fruit epi-catechin Epi-catechin content epi-catechin Fruit Flower Timing of petal fall Flower petal fall petal fall Reaction to leaf rust Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Stem lesion size Fungal lesion size Stem lesion size Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Plant growth and yield due to soil A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot Fruit alternaria rot Fruit alternaria rot Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Visual observation of aphids Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number Measurement of pollen germination rate Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU chilling requirement Chill units for 50% budbreak Bud Bud chilling requirement Chlorogenic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Percent fruit set Percent of fruit set on the plant measured g/100 mL 1-3 scale cluster tightness 1-3 scale pollen germination rate Percent of dead buds from frost damage Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Fructose content Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Caffeic acid content Percent of dead buds due to winter damage Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Quercetin rutinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight firmness, measured Fruit firmness, measured Firmness of fruit measurement Fruit Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 Visual rating of cluster tightness Number of days to 50% re-bloom Plant 50% re-bloom Plant 50% re-bloom Visual rating of fruit yield Rating of yield on a scale Chill unit measurement Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. temperature in celsius Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush late green Fruit late green Fruit Timing of late green fruit Rating of plant growth habit Visual rating of plant growth habit Fruit sucrose content Sucrose content Fruit sucrose content Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Delphinidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Delphinidin arabinoside content Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Days to 5% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe 1-9 scale fruit size Count of numer of berries per cup Count of number of berries per cup Fruit quercetin galactoside content Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content quercetin galactoside content Fruit Plant 5% ripe Plant Number of days to 5% ripe 5% ripe Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Number of upright berries Fruit anthracnose rot Fruit Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot anthracnose rot Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge leafhoper Leaf leafhoper Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper Leaf Delphinidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug caffeic acid Caffeic acid content Fruit Fruit caffeic acid thrips Flower Flower thrips Susceptibility to flower thrips Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Uniformity of bud size 0-1 color scale 1-9 scale fruit decay cm2 Plant yield Plant yield Plant yield flavor, 1-9 scale Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Fruit height Plant Plant height Plant height measured in centimeters Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin galactoside content Fruit Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content quercetin arabinoside content Fruit quercetin arabinoside content Plant leafhopper resistance Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis leafhopper resistance Plant Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker Visual observation of stem canker width Plant Plant width measured in centimeters Plant width Fruit color after wax removal color - wax removed Fruit color - wax removed Fruit method_of Total acid content Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Number of upright flowers Number of upright flowers on the plant measured SWD adult mortality percent Fruit SWD adult mortality Fruit SWD adult mortality Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Visual observation of exobasidium spot Number of seeds per fruit Average number of seeds per fruit 1-10 scale winter hardiness 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax Percent soluble solids Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer 1-9 scale growth habit Plant vigor Plant vigor Plant vigor Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin glucoside content Root Susceptibility to nematodes nematodes Root nematodes 1-9 scale plant vigor Color of flowers recorded using available list Observed color of blooms Fruit Fruit cyanidin arabinoside cyanidin arabinoside Cyanidin arabinoside content Fruit cyanidin glucoside Cyanidin glucoside content cyanidin glucoside Fruit Flower self-fertility Flower self-fertility Self-fertility of cultivar Fruit Fruit calyx on/off calyx on/off Presence of calyx at time of harvest The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit bloom durability bloom durability Fruit Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest BLSHV presence Plant Plant BLSHV presence Fruit color Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit color Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Fruit rot presence or absence Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH 1-9 scale calyx Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions Pollen germination rate germination rate Pollen Pollen germination rate g/mm Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. 1-9 scale fruit crispness 0-9 color scale 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Kaempferol glucoside content