20% killed to the ground 9.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CYGLC_CyanidinGlucoside_mg/100g CYGLC Blueberry consortium NFR NFR_InVivoPollinationFruit_% USDA-ARS-HCRL 9.0 very easy to remove Blueberry consortium SWDOSIC SWDOSIC_SWDResistanceOviposition_count GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium Michigan State University WHWOOD WHWOOD_WinterHardiness_1-10scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL FLAVONC_Flavanol_mg/100g Blueberry consortium FLAVONC FLAVANC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FLAVANC_Flavonol_mg/100g FRFRM2_FruitFirmnessMeasurement_N FRFRM2 USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRSZ2 Blueberry consortium FRSZ2_BerriesPerCup_count GRIN-Vaccinium FRSC USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSC_FruitPickScar_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS ALFR_SusToAlternariaFR_0/1 ALFR Blueberry consortium SUCC SUCC_Sucrose_g/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 15% difficult to remove 7.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL PGLC_PeonidinGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium PGLC FWT FWT_Ave25FruitWeight_g USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL CLUSTER2_ClusterTightness_1-3scale CLUSTER2 Blueberry consortium DGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium DGLC_DelphinidinGlucoside_mg/100g light black fruit 2.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL YLD Blueberry consortium YLD_FruitYield_1-9scale SWDRI Blueberry consortium SWDRI_SWDresistance_0-5Index GRIN-Vaccinium FRSZ USDA-ARS-HCRL FRSZ_FruitSizescale_1-9scale Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium MONO_MonoGrowthHabit_0/1 MONO USDA-ARS-HCRL 6.0 30% decayed mostly firm 7.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL FRSP_FruitSplit_% Blueberry consortium FRSP GFRD_LossGreenFruit_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL GFRD Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI FAC Blueberry consortium FAC_FerulicAcid_mg/100g 90% willowy 2.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI ECC_Epi-catechin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium ECC FRPH USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRPH_FruitJuice_pH extremely loose 9.0 weak, 80% will die 2.0 DAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium DAC_DelphinidinArabinoside_mg/100g very vigorous (highest survival) 9.0 Blueberry consortium FRCL2_FruitColorRemoveWax_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL2 GRIN-Vaccinium SWDRR_SWDReproductiveRate_count Blueberry consortium SWDRR MINSOIL_VegVigorYieldNitrientDef_0-10Index MINSOIL Blueberry consortium Ohio State University 1 bud/cane 1.0 dark red fruit 5.0 Blueberry consortium GALL_SusToGallMidge_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL GALL SWDLPF_SWDlarvaePerFruit_count GRIN-Vaccinium SWDLPF Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS3 SS3_Sugar10Berries_brix Blueberry consortium 80% uniformly sized buds 2.0 GRIN-Vaccinium REPEATBLM_RepeatBloom_% REPEATBLM Blueberry consortium dark red fruit 5.0 1.0 difficult to remove GRIN-Vaccinium FLWRSUPRGT_UprightFlowers_count Blueberry consortium FLWRSUPRGT Blueberry consortium EGF_EarlyGreenFruit_date EGF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Blueberry consortium BRF USDA-ARS-GIFVL BRF_75%Ripe_date Blueberry consortium TA2_FruitTitratableAcidity2_g/100 mL USDA-ARS-HCRL TA2 North Carolina State University-PHHI QGC QGC_Quercetin3-D-galactosideAndOrGlucoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium SCALE Blueberry consortium SCALE_SusToscaleInsects_0/1 USDA-ARS 3.0 Highest FIB FIB_EarlyBloomStage_date Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL 3.0 4+ buds/cane 9.0 best, homogeneous 6.0 above average vigorous (40% will die) 1.0 weak, most will die Blueberry consortium BLSHVE BLSHVE_ShockVirusELISA_0-3scale GRIN-Vaccinium MGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium MGLC_MalvidinGlucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium LFD LFD_LeafDensity_1-9scale Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FRROT_SusToAnthracnoseFR_% FRROT short harvest spread level 7 (20% harvested in greater than 10 days) 7.0 no damage 10.0 5% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 8.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium MAC_MalvidinArabinoside _mg/100g MAC Blueberry consortium STGW USDA-ARS STGW_SusToStemGallWasp_0/1 DNARATIO_DNA/stdDNA_DNA/stdDNA DNARATIO GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium FRD FRD_StorageFruitDecay_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium PEGAC_PetunidinGalactoside _mg/100g PEGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL high resistance (75% resistant) 4.0 moderatly firm 6.0 5.0 balanced tartness and sweetness 2.0 mostly tight North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium CAC CAC_CaffeicAcid_mg/100g 7.0 moderately loose BDMT_SusToBudMite_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BDMT 1.0 dense 9.0 no damage USDA-ARS-HCRL BLODUR BLODUR_BloomDurationOnFruit_1-9scale Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium STBL_FungalLesionSize_mm STBL WHBUD_WinterDamage_0-10scale USDA-ARS-HCRL WHBUD Blueberry consortium 6.0 30% large, deep, torn skin, wet Blueberry consortium BLSHVP_BSVsymp_0/1 USDA-ARS-HCRL BLSHVP USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CYAC CYAC_CyanidinArabinoside_mg/100g MALAC_MalicAcid_mg/L Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-TCHSL MALAC FC_Color_0-9scale FC GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium MBBL MBBL_ShootsWithMummyBerryBlight_% Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research Blueberry consortium PRR PRR_SusToPhytophthoraRR_0/1 USDA-ARS PLHGT_PlantHeight_cm Blueberry consortium PLHGT USDA-ARS-HCRL 4.0 above average harvest spread (50% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 90% damage 2.0 6.0 30% heterogeneous sizes USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium PHTB_SusToPTB_0/1 PHTB USDA-ARS-HCRL SELF SELF_SelfFertility_% Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium QAC QAC_QuercetinArabinosidePentoside _mg/100g 5.0 45% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits BMS_SusBMSB_0/1 USDA-ARS BMS Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium BERRUPRGT BERRUPRGT_UprightBerries_count Blueberry consortium 50RB USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 50RB_50%ReBloom_day BUDSZ_BudSizeUniformity_1-5scale Blueberry consortium BUDSZ Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research long harvest spread (80% harvested in greater than 10 days) 1.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCR FRCR_FruitCrispness_1-9scale FRFRMB_FruitFirmnessRetention_0/1 FRFRMB USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium Blueberry ontology Blueberry consortium DGAC_DelphinidinGalactoside_mg/100g DGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRCL USDA-ARS-HCRL FRCL_FruitColor_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FREASE_FruitEaseOfRelease_1-9scale FREASE Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium SWDVEPF SWDVEPF_SWDViableEggsPerFruit_count 4.0 60% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits short harvest spread (80% of berries harvested in less than 10 days) 9.0 very tart but sweetness 2.0 LRR USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium LRR_LeafRustReaction_0-4scale between or average 2.0 semi firm 5.0 semi firm 5.0 45% heterogeneous sizes 5.0 6.0 40% having calyx moderately mush 3.0 30% buds destroyed 8.0 6.0 light red fruit CLUSTER_ClusterTightnessIndiFruits_1-9scale Blueberry consortium CLUSTER USDA-ARS-TCHSL 3.0 75% heterogeneous sizes USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 50RP_50%Ripe_day 50RP too firm 9.0 LHR_ResToLeafhopper_index LHR North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS CFW CFW_SusToChrryFW_0/1 9.0 aluminum blue fruits FRP_FirstBerryRipe_date USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRP high yield, optimal 8.0 acronym 4.0 20% uniformly sized buds PB1C_Procyanidin-B1 _mg/100g Blueberry consortium PB1C North Carolina State University-PHHI light blue fruits 8.0 50% killed to the ground 6.0 very firm 9.0 Blueberry consortium BBC BBC_SusToBBC_0/1 USDA-ARS 4.0 60% damage SHEXP Jeannie Rowland USDA-ARS-GIFVL SHEXP_ShootExpansion_date STB USDA-ARS STB_SusToStemBorers_0/1 Blueberry consortium 9.0 stays on GLUCC_Glucose_g/L Blueberry consortium GLUCC USDA-ARS BS USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium BS_BudsPerCane_1-3scale attractive, uniform size, perfect roundness, blossom end intact 9.0 WINM_SusToWinterMoth_0/1 USDA-ARS WINM Blueberry consortium 3.0 dark purple fruit TA Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research TA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL GRH_GrowthHabit_1-9scale GRH Blueberry consortium 50B_50%Bloom_day 50B Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium 95RP USDA-ARS-HCRL 95RP_95%Ripe_day 8.0 5% heterogeneous sizes 4.0 70% buds destroyed USDA-ARS-TCHSL TADA_JuiceTitratableAcidity_mg/mL TADA Blueberry consortium 8.0 5% damage LC LC_Color_0-1scale GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium moderately short harvest spread (30% harvested in greater than 10 days) 6.0 still too tart 3.0 Blueberry consortium STCA USDA-ARS-HCRL STCA_SusToStemCanker_0/1 60% having calyx 4.0 2.0 moderately loose canopy VIG3_PlantVigorM_cm2 USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG3 Blueberry consortium Blueberry consortium BLSV BLSV_SusToScorchVirus_0/1 USDA-ARS 1.0 all calyx BLOOM Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL BLOOM_BloomAmount_1-9scale 3.0 75% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits Blueberry consortium FLTH_SusToFlowerThrips_0/1 USDA-ARS FLTH 4.0 slight too tart but acceptable semi mush 4.0 Jeannie Rowland FRFRM_FruitFirmnessEst_1-9scale FRFRM USDA-ARS-GIFVL USDA-ARS ASTB Blueberry consortium ASTB_SusToASB_0/1 COLDTL_50%BudInjuryTemp_celsius COLDTL Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL PLWTH_PlantWidth_cm Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL PLWTH TOTAC_TotAcid_mg/L USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium TOTAC North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium QRC_Quercetin-3-Rutinoside _mg/100g QRC 3.0 dark purple fruit SS_Sugar200gHomogenatedBerries_brix SS Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research FRUCC FRUCC_Fructose_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 8.0 5% large, deep, torn skin, wet PAC_PeonidinArabinoside _mg/100g Blueberry consortium PAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL 5.0 average yield Blueberry consortium Philip E. Marucci Center for Blueberry and Cranberry Research MBFR_FruitsWithMummyBerryRot_% MBFR USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium BLS_SusToBLS_0/1 BLS LBR_LeafBloomOrder_-0/1/1scale Ebrahiem Babiker LBR USDA-ARS-HCRL NRBV_SusToNRBV_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium NRBV 90% difficult to remove 2.0 CRFW CRFW_SusToCranberryFW_0/1 USDA-ARS Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FLBL FLBL_BloomDeathBLSHV/Pseudomonas_% Blueberry consortium POLR USDA-ARS-HCRL POLR_InVivoPollinationsFlowers_% Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRDIA FRDIA_Ave20FruitDiameter_mm 2.0 medium-loose no decay 9.0 2.0 90% buds destroyed USDA-ARS APH APH_SusToAphids_0/1 Blueberry consortium CC_Catechin_mg/100g CC Blueberry consortium North Carolina State University-PHHI PB2C North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium PB2C_Procyanidin-B2 _mg/100g Blueberry consortium ELFS_SusToELFS_0/1 ELFS USDA-ARS 90% large, deep, torn skin, wet 2.0 5RP_5%Ripe_day USDA-ARS-GIFVL 5RP Blueberry consortium 1.0 killed to the ground PEGLC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PEGLC_PetunidinGlucoside _mg/100g FRF USDA-ARS-GIFVL Jeannie Rowland FRF_FruitFlavor_0-9scale 15% heterogeneous sizes 7.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium TTT TTT_CultivarID_0/1 SWD_SWDresistanceAntibiosis_1-5Index USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium SWD 8.0 nice pop, optimal firmness Ebrahiem Babiker FRFRMMEAN_AgrostaFirmness_g/mm FRFRMMEAN USDA-ARS-TCHSL 6.0 light red fruit TPC_TotPhenolics_mg/L TPC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 8.0 5% rubs off Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL HVSP HVSP_UniformRipe_1-9scale 7.0 slightly tart but sweetness overpowering PLGRC_UprightGrowth_cm GRIN-Vaccinium Blueberry consortium PLGRC 3.0 75% decayed Blueberry consortium BLSHV GRIN-Vaccinium BLSHV_YearsBeforePositiveShockVirus_year 3.0 vigorous Blueberry consortium NEM_SusToNematodes_0/1 NEM USDA-ARS attribute 7.0 mostly firm 45% damage 5.0 Blueberry consortium MGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL MGAC_MalvidinGalactoside _mg/100g 2.0 light black fruit Blueberry consortium SNL_SusToSharp-nosedLH_0/1 SNL USDA-ARS 5% decayed 8.0 60% decayed 4.0 PHENAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PHENAC_PhenolicAcid _mg/100g 20% buds destroyed 9.0 SWDAMP Blueberry consortium SWDAMP_SWDAdultMortality_% GRIN-Vaccinium USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FRFB_FruitFlavor_0/1 FRFB loose (type 5) 5.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL SDN_AveSeedCountPerFruit_count Blueberry consortium SDN FWT2_Ave30FruitWeight_g FWT2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CR Blueberry consortium CR_50%budbreakChillUnits_hour USDA-ARS-GIFVL GRIN-Vaccinium POLGR_PollenGermination_1-3scale Blueberry consortium POLGR FRUV USDA-ARS-HCRL FRUV_FruitUVDamage_1-9scale Blueberry consortium 5.0 60% buds destroyed Blueberry consortium PFRROT_FruitRot_% GRIN-Vaccinium PFRROT YLDW USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium YLDW_AveFruitYieldPerPlant_kg Blueberry consortium YIELDACRE GRIN-Vaccinium YIELDACRE_Yield_kg 4.0 semi soft Blueberry consortium BLMAG_SusToMaggot_0/1 BLMAG USDA-ARS stocky 9.0 Lowest 1.0 BSZ_BushSize_cm2 Blueberry consortium BSZ USDA-ARS-HCRL too firm 9.0 9.0 aluminum blue fruits SWDOSIS Blueberry consortium GRIN-Vaccinium SWDOSIS_SWDresistanceOviposition_0/1 awful 1.0 North Carolina State University-PHHI AGC Blueberry consortium AGC_Syringetin3-Glucoside _mg/100g USDA-ARS-HCRL VIG2 VIG2_PlantVigor_1-3scale Blueberry consortium semi-loose canopy 3.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL SS2 SS2_TotSugar_brix Blueberry consortium 6.0 above average yield Blueberry consortium LGF USDA-ARS-GIFVL LGF_LateGreenFruit_date no damage 10.0 30% killed to the ground 8.0 VIG_Vigor_1-9scale USDA-ARS-TCHSL VIG Blueberry consortium loose 3.0 1.0 black fruit BS2_BudsNo_buds/cane USDA-ARS-HCRL BS2 Blueberry consortium low yield 3.0 9.0 very dense canopy CHAC CHAC_ChlorogenicAcid_mg/100g North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium 1.0 weak 5.0 45% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 semi-loose 1.0 mush moderately soft 3.0 1.0 less dense canopy 2.0 long harvest spread (70% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 5.0 60% killed to the ground 60% large, deep, torn skin, wet 4.0 50% buds destroyed 6.0 FRDMG USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium FRDMG_FrostDamage_% 45% rubs off 5.0 5.0 semi firm no yield 1.0 moderately low yiedld 4.0 maximum resistance (>80% resistant) 5.0 USDA-ARS-HCRL Blueberry consortium FT_FruitTexture_1-9scale FT all decayed 1.0 PGAC_PeonidinGalactoside _mg/100g PGAC USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium 1.0 black fruit North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium MGC MGC_Myricetin3-glucoside _mg/100g FRDIA2 Ebrahiem Babiker FRDIA2_Ave30FruitDiameter_mm USDA-ARS-TCHSL 5.0 average density canopy FRF2_FruitFlavor_1-9scale Blueberry consortium FRF2 USDA-ARS-HCRL CALYX_Calyx_1-9scale CALYX Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-HCRL FRAP_FruitAppearance_1-9scale USDA-ARS-HCRL FRAP Blueberry consortium 3.0 50% uniformly sized buds 4.0 60% willowy 80% killed to the ground 3.0 Blueberry consortium USDA-ARS-GIFVL SS5 SS5_SugarOneBerry_brix 2.0 90% decayed 7.0 dark blue fruits CYGAC Blueberry consortium CYGAC_CyanidinGalactoside_mg/100g USDA-ARS-TCHSL 8.0 short harvest spread level 7 (10% harvested in greater than 10 days) TAC USDA-ARS TAC_TotAnthocyanin_mg/100g Blueberry consortium 4.0 loose canopy 70% having calyx 3.0 Blueberry consortium FUB_FullBloom_date USDA-ARS-GIFVL FUB 75% difficult to remove 3.0 4.0 70% killed to the ground USDA-ARS WGR_SusToWhiteGrubs_0/1 WGR Blueberry consortium 6.0 above average dense canopy 60% heterogeneous sizes 4.0 2.0 light resistance (30% resistant) 7.0 15% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 20% having calyx 8.0 5.0 45% decayed small, dry 9.0 1.0 uniformly sized buds 80% buds destroyed 3.0 30% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits 6.0 7.0 40% killed to the ground 4.0 light purple fruit mostly mush 2.0 30% willowy 6.0 BLST USDA-ARS BLST_SusToStunt_0/1 Blueberry consortium TAC2 USDA-ARS-TCHSL TAC2_TotAnthocyanin _mg/100g Blueberry consortium moderately high yield 7.0 8.0 5% difficult to remove TA3_FruitTitratableAcidity_g/100 mL TA3 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium moderately vigoroug (30% will die) 7.0 5.0 45% willowy PC Blueberry consortium PC_SusToPlumCurculio_0/1 USDA-ARS 9.0 no calyx 1.0 ugly, mishappen, odd size, lumpy fruit GRIN-Vaccinium SSP_SolubleSolids_% Blueberry consortium SSP 15% willowy 7.0 6.0 moderatly firm mostly loose 8.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium PEAC PEAC_PetunidinArabinoside _mg/100g PENTMEAN USDA-ARS-TCHSL Ebrahiem Babiker PENTMEAN_AgrostaPenetration_ms 6.0 moderatly firm dense canopy 8.0 4.0 60% difficult to remove Jeannie Rowland PF_PetalFall_date PF USDA-ARS-GIFVL North Carolina State University-PHHI Blueberry consortium KGC_Kaempferol-7-O-Glucoside_mg/100g KGC GRIN-Vaccinium FSP Blueberry consortium FSP_FruitSet_% 2.0 90% heterogeneous sizes all buds destroyed on bush 1.0 3.0 moderately mush 2.0 90% ugly, mishappen, lumpy fruits USDA-ARS ANFR Blueberry consortium ANFR_SusToAnthracnoseFR_0/1 30% difficult to remove 6.0 Blueberry consortium DGLUCC_Glucose_g/L DGLUCC USDA-ARS-TCHSL moderately dense canopy 7.0 1.0 large, deep, torn skin, wet 30% rubs off 6.0 mostly mush 2.0 2.0 90% rubs off 1.0 very soft 75% rubs off 3.0 5% willowy 8.0 4.0 semi mush minimal resistance (15% resistant) 1.0 dark blue fruits 7.0 willowy 1.0 weak, 70% will die 3.0 7.0 15% decayed 60% will die 4.0 lots of damage 1.0 7.0 30% having calyx slightly tart but good sweetness 6.0 40% buds destroyed 7.0 crunch 8.0 6.0 30% damage 7.0 15% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 75% damage 4.0 60% rubs off 90% killed to the ground 2.0 half having calyx (50%) 5.0 1.0 mush moderately tight 3.0 2-3 buds/cane 2.0 nice pop, optimal firmness 8.0 substantial difference between smallest and largest buds 5.0 1.0 rubs off easily worst, heterogenous sizes 1.0 light blue fruits 8.0 7.0 15% damage 2.0 80% having calyx 2.0 very low yield 7.0 15% rubs off light purple fruit 4.0 5.0 average harvest spread (40% harvested in greater than 10 days)) mostly soft 2.0 moderate resistance (45% resistant) 3.0 8.0 sweetness overpowering 9.0 overloaded, berries crowded, branches drooping or breaking 7.0 mostly firm very tight 1.0 USDA-ARS-TCHSL Blueberry consortium CITAC_CitricAcid_mg/L CITAC entity 75% large, deep, torn skin, wet 3.0 5.0 45% difficult to remove excellent 9.0 75% willowy 3.0 5.0 average vigorous, 50% will die moderately long harvest spread (60% harvested in greater than 10 days)) 3.0 8.0 vigorous (20% will die) loose (type 6) 6.0 2.0 Medium Visual observation of cherry worm Visual observation of insect presence of Cherry fruit worm Measurement of plant width in centimeters Measurement of plant width in centimeters in January Quercetin rutinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit total phenolics content total phenolics content Total phenolics content measured with a discrete analyzer Fruit Percent of berries that were split after submersion in water for 14 hr. Percent of fruit that split from water Fruit storage decay Amount of fruit decay after storage Fruit storage decay Percent of dead buds from frost damage Percent of dead buds due to frost damage Number of days from January 1 to 95% ripe Days to 95% ripe Plant fruit number Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations fruit number Plant Visual rating of UV damage on fruit Amount of UV damage Percent of fruit that split after setting in water Fruit Fruit splitting after wetting splitting after wetting Visual observation of blueberry scorch virus Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry scorch virus Percent of fruit rot Fruit rot Fruit rot Peonidin arabinoside content peonidin arabinoside Fruit Fruit peonidin arabinoside Fruit flavor Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit flavor Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin glucoside content Measurement of damage from winter weather winter hardiness Bud winter hardiness Bud Confirming cultivar identity with pedigree analysis If offspring have alleles from parents they are true to type. Visual observation of disease presence of Blueberry stunt Visual observation of blueberry stunt Percent of shoots with blight Number of blighted and non-blighted shoots were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Computation of bush size based on height and width at end of summer height x width measurement cm2 mg/100 g method_of Visual survey of winter damage to buds on scale of 1-10. 1 = all buds dead, 10= no damage. Amount of winter damage on scale 0/1 Fruit catechin Fruit Catechin content catechin Uniform ripening Fruit Fruit uniform ripening uniform ripening Days to 50% ripe Number of days from January 1 to 50% ripe Measurement of yield per plant Average fruit yield (kg) per plant from 4 plants/genotype Visual observation of insect presence of Cranberry fruit worm Visual observation of cranberry fruit worm Quercetin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Plant Number of days to 5% ripe Plant 5% ripe 5% ripe Ratio of DNA to DNA in standard plant Flow cytometry measurement of the ratio of the amoun tof sample DNA to the amount of DNA in a standard plant. Flow Cytometry determination using DAPI with internal standard = Vinca minor. Performed by Plant Cytometry Services, The Netherlands, 30 June 2012. This project was a collaborative effort from the USDA ARS and the University of Florida. Visual observation of insect presence of Flower thrips Visual observation of thrips Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B1 content Number of upright flowers on the plant measured Number of upright flowers Delphinidin galactoside content Fruit Fruit delphinidin galactoside delphinidin galactoside 1-9 scale fruit decay A resistance index was calculated as the sum of the number of fly reproductive parameters not significant (indicated by **) from the host (Vaccinium) standard)) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard). The minimal resistance value is 1, the maximum is 5. Rating of berry resistance to SWD feeding Subjective rating or describe density of leaves in plant canopy Visual rating of density of leaves in plant canopy Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-9 Visual rating of cluster tightness Visual observation of insect presence of blueberry maggot Visual observation of insect presence g/100 mL Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Caffeic acid content cm Plant Plant height measured in centimeters height Plant height Fruit Fruit SWD antibiosis SWD antibiosis SWD resistance (antibiosis) of fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) Plant first bloom first bloom Plant Firmness of fruit measurement Fruit firmness, measured Fruit firmness, measured Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-3 Visual rating of plant vigor Average time needed to penetrate fruits Average time needed under fixed pressure to pentrate (displacement probe) 30 berries on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as duration in milliseconds Visual observation of disease presence Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial leaf scorch Fruit plum curculio Fruit plum curculio Susceptibility to plum curculio Plant bud set bud set Number of buds per cane Plant Fruit acidity determined via titration by the OSU Food Science Dept Measurement of fruit acidity via titration by OSU borers Susceptibility to stem borers Stem Stem borers Measure of sugar content by measuring percent of dissolved solids Fruit Fruit soluble solids soluble solids Fruit Fruit texture texture Texture of mature fruit Plant 50% ripe Number of days to 50% ripe Plant 50% ripe Fungal lesion size Stem Stem lesion size lesion size Fruit size Fruit size rated on a scale Fruit size mm Blueberry Shock Virus presence Visual evaluation of plants for BLSHV presence in the field prior to harvest Numer of upright flowers upright flowers Plant Plant upright flowers Flower self-fertility Flower Self-fertility of cultivar self-fertility Fruit juice acidity determined via titration with 0.1 N NaOH titrated to endpoint of pH 8.2 Measurement of fruit acidity via titration with NaOH leafhoper Leaf leafhoper Leaf Susceptibility to sharp-nosed leafhopper Rating of fruit size Visual rating of overall fruit size full bloom Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>80%) Plant full bloom Plant Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin arabinoside content Malvidin galactoside content malvidin galactoside content Fruit malvidin galactoside content Fruit Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit Anthocyanin is extracted and measured using a spectophotometer. percent Measurement of sugar content or ripeness determined using a handheld refractometer Percent soluble solids Effectiveness of self-pollination Cross with self-pollen or bulk-pollen at least 50 flowers/cross, record number of flowers pollinated, fruit harvested, fruit weight, seed count/fruit and compare self-pollinated with bulk-pollinated Total anthocyanin in fruit Fruit total anthocyanin content Fruit total anthocyanin content Susceptibility to cherry fruit worm cherry worm Fruit cherry worm Fruit Cyanidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Susceptibility to blueberry stunt Plant stunt stunt Plant Visual survey of fruit color after wax is removed Color of fruit when wax is rubbed off Number of seeds per fruit Average number of seeds per fruit Sugar content in berry juice from a 10-berry sample at 50% ripe stage measured with refractometer as percent of dissolved solids (brix). Total sugar content measured in Brix Rating of fruit decay after storage Visual rating of fruit decay Total acid content Total acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. 1-9 scale fruit UV damange D-glucose content Fruit D-glucose content D-glucose content Fruit Percent of flowers which have died due to disease Percent of dead flowers Measurement of bud set Count number floral buds (clusters) on 3 random canes 0-10 scale winter damage Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Plant Plant first ripe first ripe Fruit cyanidin galactoside cyanidin galactoside Fruit Cyanidin galactoside content color Color of fruit rated on a scale of 1-9 Fruit Fruit color monopodial Stem Stem monopodial Monopodial growth habit Plant true to type true to type Plant Confirmation of cultivar identity based on pedigree analysis using molecular markers Spotted-wing drosphila average larvae per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila larvae per fruit myricetin glucoside Myricetin 3-glucoside content Fruit myricetin glucoside Fruit Visual observation of phomopsis twig blight Visual observation of disease presence of Phomopsis twig blight Average weight of 30 fruits Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 30 fruit sample Visual observation of insect presence of Stem borers Visual observation of stem borers Average weight (g) of one fruit calculated from 25 fruit sample. Average weight of 25 fruits Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Full Bloom stage (>50%). Visual observation of phytophthora root rot Visual observation of disease presence of Phytophthora root rot Fruit penetration time Fruit penetration time Time elapsed for pentration Amount of winter damage on stem Visual survey of winter damage to wood (stems) on scale of 1-10. 1 = all dead, 10 = no damage. Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge Visual observation of insect presence of Gall midge phytophthora rot Susceptibility to phytophthora root rot Root phytophthora rot Root Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Petal Fall (PF) stage (>50%). Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Malvidin glucoside content Number of days from January 1st to 50% bloom Days to 50% bloom Syringetin 3-glucoside content Fruit syrengitin 3-glucoside content syrengitin 3-glucoside content Fruit Fruit quercetin arabinoside content Quercetin-arabinoside and/or pentoside content Fruit quercetin arabinoside content 0-1 color scale Bud mite Bud mite Susceptibility to bud mite 0-3 scale Fruit SWD reproductive rate SWD reproductive rate SWD reproductive rate Fruit Fruit Fruit firmness, scale firmness, scale Firmness of fruit estimation Shoot Shoot mummy berry blight susceptibility Percent of shoots with mummy berry blight mummy berry blight susceptibility 1-9 scale procyanidin-B1 content Procyanidin-B1 content Fruit Fruit procyanidin-B1 content Spotted-wing Drosophila reproductive rate Spotted-wing drosphila reproductive rate calculated Fruit cluster tightness between individual fruits cluster tightness Fruit cluster tightness Fruit density Leaf density Density of leaves in plant canopy Leaf Plant Number of days to 50% re-bloom Plant 50% re-bloom 50% re-bloom Chill units for 50% budbreak Bud Bud chilling requirement chilling requirement Malic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Malic acid content Fruit Fruit early green early green Timing of early green fruit glucose content Glucose content Fruit glucose content Fruit width Plant Plant width Plant width measured in centimeters Fruit Fruit green fruit drop green fruit drop Loss of green fruit at beginning of season before ripening Chlorogenic acid content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit rot presence or absence Visual observation of disease presence of Anthracnose fruit rot Malvidin arabinoside content Fruit Fruit malvidin arabinoside content malvidin arabinoside content Peonidin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin galactoside content cold damage Bud cold damage The temperature causing 50% bud injury (LT50) Bud Anthocyanin is extracted from berry juice and measured using a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of total anthocyanin extracted from fruit using discrete analyser Percent of fruit with mummy berry rot Fruit Fruit mummy berry rot susceptibility mummy berry rot susceptibility Visual survey of bud size on scale of 1 to 5. Uniformity of bud size Fruit peonidin glucoside Fruit peonidin glucoside Peonidin glucoside content procyanidin-B2 content Procyanidin-B2 content Fruit procyanidin-B2 content Fruit temperature in celsius flower color Color of flowers Flower color Flower Timing of shoot expansion Shoot expansion expansion Shoot Plant Susceptibility to blueberry scorch virus scorch virus Plant scorch virus Ratio of DNA to DNA in a standard plant Plant Plant DNA ratio DNA ratio Myricetin glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Percent fruit set Plant fruit set Plant fruit set Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached >75% blue/ripe fruit (75Blue) stage (>50%). Visual count of the number of buds per cane Rating of bud set mg anthocyanin/100 g fruit Fruit cranberry worm cranberry worm Fruit Susceptibility to cranberry fruit worm kaempferol glucoside Fruit Fruit kaempferol glucoside Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside content Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Day of year (Julian day) when first berry is ripe Color of flowers recorded using available list Observed color of blooms Quercetin-3-Rutinoside content Fruit quercetin rutinoside content quercetin rutinoside content Fruit Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Delphinidin glucoside content Percent repeat bloom Plant repeat bloom Plant repeat bloom phenolic acid Phenolic acid content Fruit phenolic acid Fruit Flavanol content Flavanol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Cyanidin arabinoside content Fruit cyanidin arabinoside Fruit cyanidin arabinoside 1-9 scale growth habit Visual observation of aphids Visual observation of insect presence of Aphids Fruit SWD resistance, oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index count Fruit SWD oviposition success index count 1-3 scale Stem Susceptibility to phomopsis twig blight Stem phomopsis blight phomopsis blight Average diameter of 30 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 30 fruit samples using the Agrosta penetrometer with turntable according to manufacturers instructions. Rating of yield on a scale Visual rating of fruit yield maggot Susceptibility to blueberry maggot Fruit maggot Fruit Percent of fruit set on the plant measured Percent fruit set 50% bloom Plant 50% bloom Plant Number of days to 50% bloom Sucrose content Fruit sucrose content Fruit sucrose content Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of insect presence of Bud mite Visual observation of disease presence of Bacterial flight/canker Visual observation of bacterial blight/canker 0-9 scale fruit flavor Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Late Green fruit (LG) stage (>50%). 1-9 scale fruit picking scar 1-10 scale winter hardiness Fruit chlorogenic acid Chlorogenic acid content Fruit chlorogenic acid Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Visual observation of disease presence of Alternaria fruit rot Epi-catechin content Fruit epi-catechin epi-catechin Fruit Stem winter damage Measurement of damage from winter weather Stem winter damage Spotted-wing drosphila viable eggs per fruit calculated Spotted-wing Drosophila viable eggs per fruit brix Plant Plant yield yield Plant yield Total phenolics content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions Total phenolics content blight death Flower Death of blooms from BLSHV or Pseudomonas Flower blight death Count of number of berries per cup Count of numer of berries per cup hours Rating of calyx presence Visual rating of calyx on fruit at harvest (50% ripe) Plant Plant vigor Plant vigor vigor Malvidin glucoside content malvidin glucoside content Fruit Fruit malvidin glucoside content cm2 1-9 scale fruit color after removing wax Peonidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight anthracnose rot Susceptibility to anthracnose fruit rot Fruit Fruit anthracnose rot Visual observation of white grubs Visual observation of insect presence of White grubs Resistance to Scaphytopius magdalensis Plant leafhopper resistance Plant leafhopper resistance 1-5 bud size scale Leaf rust resistance Leaf rust resistance Reaction to leaves to leaf rust inoculation Visual rating of uniform ripeness (harvest spread) Rating of uniform ripening of fruit Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%). Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Bloom stage (<5%) 0-9 color scale Fruit number per cup number per cup Fruit Number of berries per cup Rating of fruit crispness/texture Characteristic of fruit when bite into Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index scale One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying, translated to show non-preference or susceptibility based on counts. Rating of fruit firmness on a scale of 1 to 9 Rating of fruit firmness Fruit petunidin galactoside content Petunidin galactoside content Fruit petunidin galactoside content Average diameter of fruit Fruit diameter Fruit diameter Rating of mature fruit texture Survey of fruit texture on a scale 1-9 scale fruit appearance Bud winter moth Bud Susceptibility to winter moth winter moth Measurement of pollen germination rate Measurement of pollen germination rate, tube length and tube number Fruit ferulic acid ferulic acid Ferulic acid content Fruit Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Observation of fruit flavor when left on bush Malvidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Fruit UV damage UV damage Amount of UV damage on fruit date 1-9 scale cluster tightness Plant Plant BLSHV presence Presence of BSV symptoms in the field pre-harvest BLSHV presence SWD resistance index Fruit SWD resistance index SWD resistance index Fruit Retention of fruit flavor while on bush Fruit Fruit flavor-bush flavor-bush 1-9 scale fruit texture grams Measurement of fruit firmness with Agrosta penetrometer Average fruit firmness measured from 30 berries with fixed pressure to measure displacement on an Agrosta penetrometer (with turntable) provided as value of force in g/mm. Fruit Fruit delphinidin glucoside Delphinidin glucoside content delphinidin glucoside Number of successful flower pollinations from in vivo pollinations Number of pollinated flowers/total number in vivo pollinations buds/cane canker Stem Susceptibility to stem canker Stem canker Fruit ease of release ease of release Ease of picking or removing fruit from plant Fruit Flower thrips Flower Susceptibility to flower thrips thrips flavanol content Flavanol content Fruit flavanol content Fruit Rating of how easy fruit is removed from bush Ease of fruit release measured at 50% ripe Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Petunidin galactoside content Shoots with flower buds were collected every 200 chill units and buds were rated after 3 weeks at 24°C. Budbreak rated on scale of 1-7. Mean chilling requirements were calculated and used to determine number of chill units required for 50% budbreak. Chill unit measurement Visual observation of insect presence of Plum curculio Visual observation of plum curculio Percent of repeat bloom Percent of repeat bloom on the plant measured Rating of cluster tightness, scale of 1-3 Visual rating of cluster tightness Measured from juice from a 200 g homogenated berry sample with a refractometer Brix reading from juice of 200 g of fruit Visual observation of scale insects Visual observation of insect presence of Scale insects Fruit Firmness of fruit with Agrosta penetrometer average fruit firmness, measured Fruit average fruit firmness, measured Size rating of picking scar on fruit picking scar Fruit picking scar Fruit Quercetin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Visual observation of insect presence of Stem gall wasp Visual observation of stem gall wasp Visual survey of the amount of bloom on fruit. Amount of bloom Average diameter of 20 fruits Average diameter (mm) of fruit calculated from 20 fruit sample variable_of Sucrose content Sucrose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Durability of bloom Visual survey of the durability of bloom on fruit after fruit is touched Index calculated from vegetative vigor, yield, and nutrient deficiency Plant Plant mineral soil adaptation index mineral soil adaptation index 1-9 scale leaf density N Ratings of uniformity of flower bud size Bud size Bud size pH of fruit juice Measurement of pH in 5 g berry juice diluted with 45 mL water dectected with pH meter. 1-9 scale fruit ease of release Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Rating of the fruit flavor Fruit flavor, 1-9 scale Visual observation of sharp-nosed leafhopper Visual observation of insect presence of Sharp-nosed leafhopper Bud frost damage Bud Late frost damage assessed as percent of dead buds frost damage 0-10 index Number of fruits harvested/total number of in vivo pollinations Number of fruit harvested from in vivo pollinations Presence of calyx at time of harvest Fruit calyx on/off Fruit calyx on/off Cyanidin galactoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Kaempferol glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Average weight of fruit weight Fruit weight Fruit Visual observation of brown marmorated stink bug Visual observation of insect presence of Brown marmorated stinkbug stinkbug Plant Plant stinkbug Susceptibility to brown marmorated stinkbug Percent of dead buds due to winter damage Shoots from plants subjected to freeze-thaw protocol, distal buds assessed for damage and percent of damage calculated, measured as LT50 which is temperature that causes 50% injury overall. Visual observation of stem canker Visual observation of disease presence of Stem canker Texture of fruit crispness Fruit crispness Fruit algal blotch Stem Susceptibility to algal stem blotch Stem algal blotch Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Early Green fruit (EG) stage (>50%). Spotted-wing drosphila resistance index calculated as in Reference Sampson et al. 2020 SWD antibiosis. Resistance Index = (sum of the non-significant reproductive parmeters (indicated by **) compared with Vaccinium standard) + 1 (for significance from non-host standard) or +2 (for non-significance from non-host standard) min = 1, max = 5 Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance index 1-9 scale fruit size Leaf color Leaf Color of leaves in fall color 1-9 scale fruit color Fruit Retention of fruit firmness while on bush firmness retention-bush Fruit firmness retention-bush 1-3 scale pollen germination rate Catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight kg Visual observation of nematodes Visual observation of disease presence of Nematodes Observed color of leaves in autumn Color of leaves during autumn weather 1-9 scale calyx Bud gall midge Susceptibility to gall midge gall midge Bud Plant Plant 95% ripe 95% ripe Number of days to 95% ripe Spotted-wing Drosophila resistance, oviposition success index count One hundred berries were sampled from each of the 88 rabbiteye and southern highbush cultivars and selections and examined for the presence or absence of SWD feeding damage or egg laying. germination rate Pollen Pollen germination rate Pollen germination rate Citric acid content Citric acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of plant height Measurement of plant height in centimeters in January ms Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Observation of fruit firmness when left on bush Glucose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Glucose content mg/L Fruit cyanidin glucoside cyanidin glucoside Fruit Cyanidin glucoside content total acid content Total acid content Fruit Fruit total acid content Fruit Fruit appearance Attractiveness of fruit appearance appearance Number of upright berries Numer of upright berries on the plant measured Leaf to bloom ratio Visual observation of the order of appearance of first leaf and first bloom in January Measurement of plant growth upright Measurement of plant upright growth in centimeters Plant growth and yield due to soil A mineral soil adaptation index (0 – 10) for each genotype was calculated as follows: mineral soil adaptation score = Ʃ mean ratings for vegetative vigor, yield balance and nutrient deficiency symptoms divided by 5. This index was used in conjunction with growth and fruiting data to evaluate genotypic response to the mineral soil environment. Individuals displaying indices > or = 7.5 exhibited mineral soil adaptation. Referenced in Scheerens, J.C., Erb, W.A., Goulart, B.L., and Hancock, J.F. (1999a). Blueberry hybrids with complex genetic backgrounds evaluated on mineral soils: stature, growth rate, yield potential and adaptability to mineral soil conditions as influenced by parental species. Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Cyanidin arabinoside content Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%) Day of year (Julian day) when plant reached Shoot Expansion (SE) stage (>50%). Delphinidin arabinoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight peonidin galactoside Peonidin galactoside content Fruit peonidin galactoside Fruit petunidin arabinoside content Fruit petunidin arabinoside content Petunidin arabinoside content Fruit Color of fruit Visual survey of fruit color Susceptibility to scale insects Stem scale insects scale insects Stem g/mm 1-9 scale uniform ripening Petunidin glucoside content Fruit petunidin glucoside content Fruit petunidin glucoside content Fruit acidity determined via titration with a 200 g homogenated berry sample Measurement of fruit acidity via titration of 200 g fruit mg/mL Fruit color after wax removal Fruit Fruit color - wax removed color - wax removed 1-9 scale plant vigor pH Brix reading from 20 fruit Measured from juice from berries. Result is average of 4 reps of 5 berries per genotype. Measured from juice from a berry sample Brix reading from fruit sample 0-4 scale leaf rust resistance g/L Measurement of fruit firmness (measurement of the force (N) to equatorially compress the berry by 20%) from 20 berries with a texture analyzer (TA.XT, Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) Measurement of fruit firmness via machine (penetrometer) Visual observation of disease presence of Exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Visual observation of exobasidium spot delphinidin arabinoside Fruit Delphinidin arabinoside content Fruit delphinidin arabinoside Fruit seed count Fruit Average seed count per fruit seed count days Leafhopper growth index values were calculated. Highly susceptible had values close to 25 and resistant had an index value of zero. Testing of leafhopper resistance in controlled conditions bloom durability Fruit bloom durability The durability of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit Fruit Timing of petal fall Flower petal fall Flower petal fall pH of juice from fruit pH Fruit pH Fruit Fruit Malic acid content malic acid content Fruit malic acid content count Measurement of stem lesions in a detached stem assay with fungal inoculations. Stem lesion size order of leaf and bloom emergence Results of Blueberry shock virus tested by ELISA assay. Used in conjunction to derive Blueberry Shock Virus Years to Develop Blueberry Shock Virus ELISA Susceptibility to bacterial blight/canker blight-canker Plant Plant blight-canker total sugar content Fruit Fruit total sugar content Total sugar content quercetin galactoside content Fruit Fruit quercetin galactoside content Quercetin 3-D-galactoside and/or glucoside content Susceptibility to exobasidium leaf and fruit spot Plant exobasidium spot Plant exobasidium spot Titratable acidity in fruit measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Measurement of titratable acidity in fruit 1-9 scale fruit yield upright berries Numer of upright berries Plant upright berries Plant gall wasp Stem gall wasp Stem Susceptibility to stem gall wasp BLSHV sensitivity Plant ELISA test results for Blueberry Shock Virus Plant BLSHV sensitivity Plant ring blotch Plant Susceptibility to necrotic ring blotch virus ring blotch Spotted-wing Drosophila adult mortality percentage Spotted-wing drosphila adult mortality percent calculated mg/100 g of fresh weight Root white grubs Root Susceptibility to white grubs white grubs Flower Flower pollination rate pollination rate Number of flowers that were successfully pollinated from in vivo pollinations Visual rating of fruit appearance Rating of fruit appearance Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual observation of loss of green fruit early in season Visual rating of plant growth habit Rating of plant growth habit Number of rotted and non-rotted fruit were counted and used to calculate percent with blight Percent of fruit with rot Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Observation if plant has monopodial growth habit Visual rating of plant vigor Rating of plant vigor on scale of 1-9 Fruit late green late green Timing of late green fruit Fruit Epi-catechin content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Fruit Fruit SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit SWD larvae per fruit Blueberry Shock Virus symptoms timing 10 very slow to test positive. Referenced in Finn, C.E., Mackey, T.A., Postman, J.D. and Martin, R.R. (2017). Identifying blueberry germplasm that is slow to get Blueberry shock virus in the Pacific Northwest United States. ]]> Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 0-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 0-9 Root nematodes Root Susceptibility to nematodes nematodes 1-9 scale fruit crispness Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Ferulic acid content caffeic acid Caffeic acid content Fruit caffeic acid Fruit Fruit Fruit bloom amount bloom amount Amount of bloom (waxy, silvery-white substance on the surface) on fruit aphids Plant Susceptibility to aphids Plant aphids Rating of fruit flavor on scale of 1-9 Tasting of fruit and application of a scale of 1-9 Days to 50% re-bloom Number of days from January 1st to 50% re-bloom 0-5Index Citric acid content citric acid content Fruit citric acid content Fruit Number of years before the plant tests positive for Blueberry Shock Virus BLSHV symptoms development time Plant Plant BLSHV symptoms development time SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Fruit SWD viable eggs per fruit Plant bush size Size of bush in January bush size Plant Leaf bacterial scorch bacterial scorch Susceptibility to bacterial leaf scorch Leaf 1-9 scale fruit firmness Flavonol content Flavonol content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. 1-5 index Fructose content Fructose content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. Juice titratable acidity Titratable acidity of juice Fruit Fruit Juice titratable acidity Four weeks after inoculation, four to six leaves were inspected and the disease reactions were rated. Reaction to leaf rust Fructose content Fruit fructose content Fruit fructose content 1-3 scale cluster tightness Plant leaf to bloom ratio Plant Order of bloom and leaf emergence in January leaf to bloom ratio Fruit Timing of >75% blue/ripe fruit blue/ripe Fruit blue/ripe flavonol content Fruit Flavonol content Fruit flavonol content Measurement of yield per acre Yield per acre as measured Percent of rotted fruit Green fruit on potted plants was inoculated and maintained plants until fruit ripened. Ripe fruit was incubated under humid conditions for approximately 1 week. Percentage rotted fruit was determined. Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Procyanidin-B2 content Visual observation of disease presence of Algal stem blotch Visual observation of algal stem blotch DNA/stdDNA Phenolic acid content Phenolic acid content in berry juice measured with a Gallery discrete analyzer according to manufacturers instructions. height x width measurement cm2 Computation of bush size based on height and width in January scale_of SWD adult mortality percent SWD adult mortality Fruit Fruit SWD adult mortality Fruit alternaria rot Susceptibility to alternaria fruit rot alternaria rot Fruit Development time in years growth index Rating of picking scar Visual rating of picking scar on fruit growth habit Upright or sprawling or narrow growth habit Plant Plant growth habit Number of days from January 1 to 5% ripe Days to 5% ripe Syrengitin 3-glucoside content Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Measured with HPLC, reported as mg/100 gram of fresh tissue weight Peonidin galactoside content Visual observation of disease presence of Necrotic ring blotch virus Visual observation of necrotic ring blotch virus Percent of fruit rot on the plant measured Percent of fruit rot Fruit Fruit SWD oviposition success index scale SWD oviposition success index scale SWD resistance, oviposition success index count 1-3 scale plant vigor 1-9 scale fruit flavor